User talk:Yahzitere Yahmarabhi

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yahosheanism (2a) (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yahosheanism (2a) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:25, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yahzitere Yahmarabhi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:25, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Meshiyach Yahzitere Yahmarabhi. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yahoshea Meshiyach

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yahoshea Meshiyach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 (talk) 16:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meshiyach Yahzitere Yahmarabhi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Meshiyach Yahzitere Yahmarabhi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 16:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yahosheanism (2a) (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yahosheanism (2a) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ibele

I appreciate that you want to contribute to Wikipedia, but your edits to this article are not in the Wikipedia style. Please review Wikipedia:Manual of Style to learn how to write and format articles in Wikipedia. Also, you must provide references to reliable sources for your edits -- see Wikipedia:Verifiability. I will provide some resources below to help you understand how to edit in Wikipedia. You should be aware, though, that tf you ignore Wikipedia's rules, your edits will be reverted, and you may be blocked from editing further. Ground Zero | t 14:55, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article you have created on Yahosheanism also violates WP:MOS and WP:V. Please revise the article so that it meets these policies. Thank you.

It is really importnant that you read WP:HEAD to understand the Wikipedia style for headings, including correct capitalisation, and that we do not start the article with a heading. Ground Zero | t 16:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Yahzitere Yahmarabhi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Ground Zero | t 14:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please pay attention

I have asked to read WP:HEAD to learn about creating headings in Wikipedia. In particular I have told you that Wikipedia does not start articles with headings. Why have you put "Introduction" headings back into at least two articles? Do you think that the style you prefer should be used for these articles instead of the style that the Wikipedia community has chosen to use for Wikipedia articles? Please fix your mistakes.

Also, please review WP:External links. We do not use external links in the text of an article. Put external links in the "External links" section of the article. Please go back and fix these errors. Thank you. Ground Zero | t 18:28, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of messiah claimants. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 16:32, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of messiah claimants. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sundayclose (talk) 16:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FINAL WARNING

Your recent editing history at List of messiah claimants shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 16:44, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

This is your last and only warning the next time you add un-notable content like you did at List of messiah claimants you will be reported and result in loss of editing priveleges. TeaLover1996 (talk) 22:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You need to pause and work to guidelines, I am sorry. Material must be able to be sourced. Try and find some before re-adding. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:03, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yahoshea

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yahoshea, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jytdog (talk) 00:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the movement claims or interviewing its management. You gave some references, but none were independent third-party sources, just affiliated sites, social media, blogs and the like. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Putting all your "references" together at the end of the text wouldn't be helpful even if they were proper sources
In the absence of any independent coverage, it's difficult to see how this topic meets the notability criteria I've linked above. Nothing about the group whose beliefs you are describing, could be three people for all we know.
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Your article has no verifiable factual content, and simply propagates the views of a particular group
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to affiliated sites.
the article was largely created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
You have edited only on this an related topics, and you say "Please we would like ..." Who is "we? You may not edit on behalf of a group or organisation. You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. In particular, if you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yahzitere Yahmarabhi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yahzitere Yahmarabhi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

We often restore deleted text on request, but there is so little verifiable factual content in your deleted text, you are better to start from scratch.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read this important guidance. You must also reply to the COI request above.

I notice that you have something of a track history in failing to follow our rules, to the extent that you were blocked. Be aware that the next time the block will be longer, so read what I have written very carefully Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yahoshean for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yahoshean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yahoshean until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yahoshea (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Of the 4 sources, 3 are to Wikipedia. This isn't allowed, as it only gives circular support. The third seems to be a blog. Any which way, there's nothing like significant coverage from third-party sources to establish the necessary Notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yahoshea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yahoshea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 00:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yahoshea (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

As you've been told, you cannot cite Wikipedia on itself, so please remove any footnotes to Wikipedia.

Also please remove any footnotes to forums, blogs, etc.

You would need to show serious and independent coverage that discusses this name.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yahoshea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yahoshea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:44, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Yahoshea

I have moved this to draft space. Please continue working with the AfC process. Jytdog (talk) 18:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia - what it is, and what it is not

You appear to have some passion for the Sacred Name Movement.

You have created a Wikipedia account, and that makes you accountable to the the mission of Wikipedia and to the editing community.

Please have a read of User:Jytdog/How, which I wrote to help passionate new users try to understand what we do here, how we do things, and why we do them that way. Please take some time to read it, and try to understand it.

You can reply here, if you have any questions. Best regards Jytdog (talk) 18:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yahoshea

Hello, Yahzitere Yahmarabhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yahoshea".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:07, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]