Jump to content

User talk:Yaduvanshi ahir's

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yadu (legendary king), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:11, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please change the name of the page of yaduvanshi rajput, you can keep yaduvanshi, or yaduvanshi ahir, not rajput Yaduvanshi ahir's (talk) 11:21, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

protected jadaun rajput Yaduvanshi ahir's (talk) 04:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jadaun rajput

[edit]

Please do not restore very poor material at articles such as Jadaun rajput. - Sitush (talk) 17:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jadaun Rajput is descended from Ahir not all only Karoli jadaun descended from Ahir The Banjara rajput community is also known as Jadaun rajput. Evidence with sources Yaduvanshi ahir's (talk) 04:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Yaduvanshi Rajput have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:34, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Karauli

[edit]

Why did you make this edit at Tomara dynasty? That changed

The word Rajput acquired modern meaning in the 16th century.

to

The Rajputs actually originated in the 16th century.

but the reference was not changed. What wording in the reference supports your edit? Please review the verification policy—text in articles must be verifiable with reliable sources. This topic is under discretionary sanctions (see #Discretionary sanctions alert above) and editors must follow procedures. Johnuniq (talk) 00:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jadaun Rajput is descended from Ahir not all only Karoli jadaun descended from Ahir The Banjara rajput community is also known as Jadaun rajput. Evidence with sources Yaduvanshi ahir's (talk) 00:13, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is the evidence? What is the source? Please explain which text in the reference in the article supports the change. Johnuniq (talk) 01:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yaduvanshi Rajput. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yaduvanshi is not only Rajput, Yaduvanshi is also Ahir Yadav, Ahirs are said to be descendants of Yadu's second son Satjit[[1]] and are believed to be descendants of the moon, belonging to the Yadu family.[[2]] The Yaduvanshi Kshatriyas were originally Ahirs.[[3]] Yaduvanshi ahir's (talk) 22:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Blocked

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Johnuniq (talk) 23:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits in a topic under discretionary sanctions are not suitable for an encyclopedia based on reliable sources. Contributors must be able to communicate effectively in English and engage with discussion. The comment at diff is particularly inappropriate. Johnuniq (talk) 23:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]