User talk:Y.D.McGinty
Hello, Y.D.McGinty, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Kimberly Lucas
[edit]Thank you for creating Kimberly Lucas, which I read with interest. I did refactor some of the text as it was close to a direct copy of the source (e.g. [1]), in particular the last paragraph. Please avoid copy pasting text from other websites, as this (with the exception of quoted material marked as such) raises copyright concerns.--Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉]) 15:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Diascund, Virginia moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Diascund, Virginia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank S. Logue has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 02:26, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Diascund, Virginia has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
SL93 (talk) 20:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]The article Charlie Holt (Episcopal clergyman) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article should be deleted because this person's biography does not meet the Wikipedia notability guidelines as "worthy of notice". This article is about an Episcopal clergyperson who is not a bishop or incoming bishop (bishop coadjutor), and is not a widely published academic. While it is normal for Episcopal bishops and bishop coadjutors to have Wikipedia articles, it is not normal for random Episcopal priests who are not noteworthy academics to have individual Wikipedia articles. Looking back at the edit history for this article, it seems to only exist because Charlie Holt was a part of a contested (and still unsettled) election to become bishop coadjutor of Florida. The initial article dates from around the first contested election. While it could certainly be argued that the contested bishop elections in Florida themselves are worthy of notice, simply being a candidate in those elections does not meet the threshold of worthy of notice. Further to the point that this biographical article only exists because of the contested election, the vast majority of the text in the article is not devoted to narrating the life events of Charlie Holt but rather around the contested election. This biographical article is really more about the contested bishop elections than about the person Charlie Holt. It is currently unsettled whether Charlie Holt will become a bishop coadjutor. If he does, then he should have a biographical wikipedia article. But until it becomes clear whether he will become a bishop, he does not meet the threshold of worthy of notice to have a biographical wikipedia article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Samford University
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Samford University, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)