User talk:XndrK/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:XndrK. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Welcome
|
- Where did you get this?
Userboxes
Hey, thanks for organizing my userboxes. How do you make a box like that?
- I didn't make that. It's a template. There are a lot out there like that, when you look at other user pages you'll see them. But you might also want to look at "Category:Userboxes" and "Category:User namespace templates". You'll see a lot of things under those categories. If you are unsure how to find those categories, just Copy (without the quote marks) and paste into your Search box. Those should come up. Good luck. — Maile (talk) 21:43, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks.
Crack pic
Hi, I know about the phenomenon you are trying to illustrate, so no problem there. However, your diagnosis about how the crack originated, although probably correct, nonetheless strikes me as original research, something that is not allowed. That said, I have myself seen many articles talking about infrastructure problems (roads, pipes, foundations) messed up by this same process. These articles usually come with photos. I bet you can find one that meets all of our reliable source standards. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:22, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Okay. Where would I look? Is this a good one? <ref>{{cite web|last=Boettcher|first=Ross|title=Drought costs homeowners as foundations crack|url=http://www.omaha.com/article/20120917/MONEY/709179972/1697|work=Omaha.com|publisher=Omaha World-Herald|accessdate=26 March 2013}}</ref> XndrK (talk) 17:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Please allow me to wax socratic by asking whether you think that reference meets or does not meet the rather simple criteria in our reliable sources guideline? NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 03:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, yeah, I think that works. Thx. However, I embarrassingly lost the article where I put the picture momentarily. Just for example, does the file on Commons have a list of pages it's used on? I'm too lazy to look. :) XndrK (talk) 17:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Being too lazy to look is not a good way to inspire experienced eds to help you learn your skills. That said there is such a link. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 17:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, yeah, I think that works. Thx. However, I embarrassingly lost the article where I put the picture momentarily. Just for example, does the file on Commons have a list of pages it's used on? I'm too lazy to look. :) XndrK (talk) 17:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Btw, why is the reference broken? When I click on it, it doesn't do anything. Did I mess something up?
- (A) I don't know; (B) you could try adding a <reflist> tag at the end of your talk page, or (C) Add "nowiki" tags to the phrase, which is what I usually do though your mileage may vary. I'm going to take the liberty of doing that to your comment (usually this is frowned on see WP:TALK) but I'm doing it for demonstration purposes, and trust you won't cry foul. If you want to later remove the "nowiki" tags, its your comment so go for it. Or ask me and I will. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 17:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Okay. It's ugly, but whatever. I'll try to figure it out. Thanks. How about I try it again?
- I got it! I figured out the problem! I cited using the news template instead of the Web template. Just to make certain, I'm going to do it again, except I'm going to use the Web template.[1]
- WHAT ON EARTH??? --XndrK (talk) 17:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- I haven't played much with this on user pages either. So this is a test[2] NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hope that was helpful. Per WP:OWNTALK you can purge any of my comments as you please and even if it were not for WP:OWNTALK you have my permission.NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, so now it does work. <sigh> XndrK (talk) 00:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
- I'm actually going to keep this, in case a similar problem pops up with anyone else. Just letting you know. XndrK (talk) 00:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
- I assume you have discovered the Help:Page history and how to display a WP:DIFF, so you can track exactly what was done different each time.... but in case not, now you know. cheers NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 09:39, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
- I haven't played much with this on user pages either. So this is a test[2] NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse invitation
|
Hello! XndrK,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!
|
Howdy there, Tex. Thought you also might find the Teahouse an interesting place. — Maile (talk) 20:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Funny. I thought I was already part of the Teahouse. Haven't used it tho. Thanks for reminding me. --XndrK (talk) 21:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- That's OK. I just stuck the invitation on here in case you've never seen it before. By the way, I straightened out the alignment of your userboxes on your main page. Your ceiling picture was so low on the page that it was knocking off the alignment of the userboxes. I also left a navbox at the bottom of your main page that will let you browse through a lot of other available userboxes out there. Have fun editing! — Maile (talk) 01:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by heather walls (talk) 18:43, 6 April 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!
Congratulations! You have earned the
|
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge |
| Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. |
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you would like to learn how to make a userbox, go to WP:Userboxes or, if your would like learn even more, maybe you should consider puting yourself up for adoption. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia (talk) 19:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
—Mikemoral♪♫ 22:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
HTML/CSS/other stuff help
Hey, XndrK, I saw your comments on the IRC help channel. I'm not sure what exactly you're trying to do (only caught the tail end of it), but if you need any help, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks, and happy editing! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 23:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Userboxes
I've turned your userboxes into three columns. For more general help on userboxes, see Wikipedia:Userboxes. The section on grouping is the one about arranging them in patterns. Huon (talk) 00:51, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse!
You have got a new reply at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions --Tito Dutta (contact) 18:14, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Tito Dutta (contact) 18:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Violet
The last sentence in the History section of Violet, Texas doesn't mean anything. Did you omit something? "Louis Petrus and Charles Hoelscher to Reverend Verdauger" Rojomoke (talk) 14:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- I fixed it. Glad to see someone else is reading it. I feel like I'm alone with that page. (In case you were wondering, they donated land for a school.) I saw that when I came back to it, but thanks for the warning anyway. I'm still grateful. --XndrK‽ 14:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback
Hi, I answered your question at the Teahouse. Your question is at the bottom, so scroll down. Next time, add a new question to the top, OK? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oops. :P --XndrK (talk · contribs · count) 00:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Reply to your question on my talk page.
Of course! I'll set your adoption classroom up! jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! Thankyouthankyouthankyouthankyouthankyouthankyouthankyouthankyouthankyou!!!! --XndrK (talk · contribs · count) 16:29, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Right then, your adoption classroom is here! I've already put a simple introduction for you. Enjoy! jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
polybutadiene and rubber balls
Hi see my response to your query at User talk:AresLiam. AresLiam (talk) 06:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- thanks for understanding. I'm new here, and probably should have first tried a more direct and private communication about my concerns. Live long and prosper.AresLiam (talk) 17:04, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- I take it you like Star Trek. --XndrK (talk · contribs · count) 20:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 20:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Trying talkback. This time, I'm not bothering anyone. I want to see what it looks like to recieve one, anyway. Ignore this. XndrK (talk · contribs · count) 20:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —teb728 t c 07:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Twinkle Talkback message.
Hi, I saw the "test", and because you're my student and I don't want you to get shot at on Wikipedia, I'm just telling you that some users prefer it if you used Template:Whisperback instead as they find it less "intruding". Just to tell you, I'm not one of those people. I got shot in the leg for this! jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:45, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- I deleted it. I meant to put it on my talk page, but I wasn't thinking. I deleted it. --XndrK (talk · contribs · count) 16:46, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- That's cool. Maybe try WP:Sandbox for as minimal disruption as you can get.jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
New Adoption Task 1
Hi XndrK! This is to tell you that you have got a new adoption task at User:Jcc/Adoption/XndrK! Enjoy and have fun. jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:42, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- On it. Btw, what time zone are you? --XndrK (talk · contribs · count) 19:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 11:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
New Lesson 3
See the new lesson on Types of Citation here. As always, enjoy! jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:40, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 21:01, 18 June 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —Mikemoral♪♫ 00:37, 19 June 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Thank you
Thank you for offering to help. I have replied to your comment on Talk:Prince of Ning rebellion.--Taiping Tulip (talk) 06:47, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
New Task 4
Hi XndrK! I'm just telling you that you have got a new adoption task at User:Jcc/Adoption/XndrK! Enjoy and have fun! If you have trouble, ask me on my talk page. jcc (tea and biscuits) 13:30, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
New Task 5
Hi XndrK! I'm just telling you that you have got a new adoption task at User:Jcc/Adoption/XndrK! Enjoy and have fun! If you have trouble, ask me on my talk page. Also, you did great on the last task, and have earned yourself a barnstar! jcc (tea and biscuits) 10:22, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
New Userpage
Hey I saw your User page and it looked a bit basic, so I decided to make it better. I hope you like it. You can change the colors around to suit your taste. If you need help just message me on my talk page. Btw, heard you were looking for newbie friends? Well look no further! A barnstar or something of the sort would be much appreciated. BUT if you don't like it, you can always revert back to the old version via the "View History" link and restore the old version. Charlotte Tame (talk) 17:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, I like simple. Can you just put an automatic header on the top? (Works better with VisualEditor, too.) P.S. I wanna barnstar! :( --XndrK (talk · contribs · count) 23:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Help cleaning up page
Could somebody help me clean up my user and talk pages? I can't even read the source code. Makes my eyes hurt.
Thanks. --XndrK (talk · contribs · count) 21:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by LukeSurl t c 22:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui 雲水 16:04, 6 December 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui 雲水 16:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Your signature
Hello! Per Wikipedia:Signatures, the use of templates in signatures is not permitted. The following markup provides the same output without the use of a template:
--XndrK (talk · contribs · count)
Note that the inclusion of external links is prohibited as well. In my view, the rule probably isn't intended to include other Wikimedia Foundation websites (such wmflabs.org), but it would be prudent to discuss the matter at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Or, if you'd like to simply remove that link, you can use this markup:
Thanks! —David Levy 04:57, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| . FruityEditor (talk) 06:06, 2 March 2014 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| . FruityEditor (talk) 06:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| , FruityEditor (talk) 06:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| . FruityEditor (talk) 06:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| , FruityEditor (talk) 06:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| . FruityEditor (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| ^^^^^666^^^^^ FruityEditor (talk) 17:12, 2 March 2014 (UTC) |
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mirror Freak 17:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Hank the Cowdog
Saw your message from 2013 on Talk:Hank the Cowdog. If you ever set up an HC task force, count me in--I've created 2 articles about different books in the series, but had them swiped and reverted. I know a good bit about the series and have been reading it for over 10 years. White Arabian mare (Neigh) 15:13, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, that would be great, but first I'd have to set up an HC task force. Honestly, I've really slowed down on WP editing (I haven't edited in three months from today, for example), but that would be a great project to get me restarted. --XndrK (talk | contribs) 22:48, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well, if you get it going, I will try to be a top contributor. These books deserve better articles than they have. One thing I'd like to see included in every article is a section about the songs in each book, because they add so much to them. White Arabian mare (Neigh) 14:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Use of non-free images
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically List of political parties in Germany, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, XndrK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, XndrK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Tagging
Please read the source before tagging next time. The sentence is attributed to the source provided with a caption stating the leaders' disdain (I believe "antipathy" was the word BBC used) for another. Because of 1RR, I would appreciate if you could self-revert. Thanks.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, XndrK. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
2019 US Banknote Contest
.png){kind=logo}
|
US Banknote Contest | 
|
|---|---|---|
| November-December 2019 | ||
|
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here | ||
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Answered your question
On the La Belle Lucie talk page. Cross Reference (talk) 05:15, 3 February 2020 (UTC)