User talk:Xideral

Welcome!

Hello, Xideral, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Morphonica, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tufacave (talk) 00:20, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Morphonica

A tag has been placed on Morphonica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tufacave (talk) 00:20, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Leon Gallo Goyenechea

Thanks for creating this short stub. I've "wikified" it in various ways. Could you please add your source of reference? Thanks. PamD (talk) 09:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Southamerican Scientific Journals

The article List of Southamerican Scientific Journals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Scientific journals are nowadays all international, even if they have geographical names in their titles (and most journals in this list don't even have that). This is demonstrated by this list, where several journals are partly or completely in English, despite being published in Spanish-speaking countries. Consequently, there are no other lists of academic journals by country and there is no reason to have this one either.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 13:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xideral. You have new messages at Crusio's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

June 2021

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have inserted Creative Commons licensed text into Wikipedia, as you did at Fusibacter. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly-licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Note: I've gone ahead and added the attribution template for Fusibacter (Special:Diff/1028942311). DanCherek (talk) 22:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]