User talk:Xi Xing Ping

July 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Arjun (tank), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 09:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Helios007 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Helios007. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - TheresNoTime ^😺 09:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xi Xing Ping (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

there's no strong evidence to suggest the claim made by formaldude and Echo1Charlie,I have just copied the claims made by Helios007 if u have any strong evidence to suggest me then u may go ahead, there's been no rule to my knowledge that prevents the users from editing the right one which is based on other editiors. If u find any spamming or any vandilism then I would accept the block, so the block is unnecessary.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. This is based on behavioral and technical evidence. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 10:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xi Xing Ping (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

MY EDITS ARE ALL BASED ON HELIOS007 not the same! , I have copied the same thing apart from that if u found anything strong then provide that, all those proofs provided by [Echo1Charlie]] and formal dude are based on assumption ONLY. As I told before all my edits are cut copy paste from the past. So,the block is unnecessary ]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry admitted below, "Indiana_James_007 is one of my account". Even without the technical evidence, this block is clearly appropriate. Yamla (talk) 10:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What about User:Indiana James 007? Same edit as Helios, same 007, same edit as you. Also a checkuser confirmed this. Also you all speak english the same way. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 10:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HighInBC could u answer my question??? Indiana_James_007 is one of my account, but the reasons are not strong enough, to link this with Helios 007. Xi Xing Ping (talk) 10:21, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HighInBC just got tired of Wikipedia, anyone could block anyone by pointing out stupid reasons Echo1Charlie. Xi Xing Ping (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HighInBC what reason you are point out now???identical to helis007??? Any other reasons plz https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1036405292 . The edit contains the required citations right?? Even Wikipedia rules out u can avoid all the rules at particular instance. Xi Xing Ping (talk) 10:27, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Echo1Charlie and HighInBC why can't u guys talk about this one?? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1036374053 Why can't Echo1Charlie can't answer that ?? Instead of filing an complaint??? I already informed him that I am gonna to edit that page. Why did he respond to that? Isn't this kind of trick? To prevent other editors to edit the page?? Xi Xing Ping (talk) 10:45, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xi Xing Ping (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account has no relation with Helios account that's the main issue here ,not to be confused with Indiana_james account, the Echo1Charlie is accusing me of an blocked account pupet. There's been no relation with Helios account which I am accusd for ,so the block is considered to be unnecessary

Decline reason:

From a technical standpoint, I have a VERY hard time believing that this account is unrelated to Helios007. There's a rather extreme coincidence regarding the device that was used to edit. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 11:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Xi Xing Ping (talk) 10:49, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You admitted Indiana_James_007 is one of my account. Using two accounts to edit war over the same edit is enough for this sockpuppet block. It really does not matter if you are Helios or not. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 10:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HighInBC editors can have multiple accounts as stated here WP:SOCK, the problem is when it is wrongly used for vandilism or to threaten stability on Wikipedia as ruled by this WP:SOCK. If I have created any so called "vandilism or threaten to stability" show me the point where I did that, I had only made request regarding clarification. Take and see any recent edits. I think u can't differentiate between editoral wars and issues, editorial war is when an editor engage in conflict with the another editor for multiple times (4+ times) on the same issue.

The Echo1Charlie along with his colleagues does not have any solid evidence to prove me as Helios account,ask them to provide any strong evidence though.
Xi Xing Ping (talk) 11:09, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Using two acconuts to edit war the same content in IS a violation of WP:SOCK, Also it doesn't matter how many times editors undo your edit, if it has been undone once DO NOT REVERT AT ALL that makes it an edit war 3RR need not be violated for an edit war to occur. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:26, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]