User talk:Xezonakiii

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Xezonakiii! I am Blablubbs and I am the volunteer who received your account request. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome! --Blablubbs|talk 07:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction of me.

Hi! I'm Xezonakiii, you may call me Xezo for short. (Seh-zoh) I've been on Wikipedia for 4 years. (Not 14, I accidentally put 1) I have 3 sons, I'm 29 years old. (I had my oldest when I was 20 on October 21, 2012, another one on November 27, 2013, and one more on January 13, 2021. Another one due this September!) I was born November 25, 1991. My son was a late birthday present haha. I hope I can make a great addition here! Xezonakiii (talk) 06:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xezonakiii (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi! I'm relatively new here and my ip address is blocked. I don't think I've done anything wrong so I'm just gonna assume I'm range blocked. May someone please uplift this block? Much appreciated and have a good day!Xezonakiii (talk) 09:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 10:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xezonakiii (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi! Whoever blocked me and labeled me as a sock puppet of the given sock puppeteer: Averybenedictxezonaki, I am not a sock puppet of this account. Yes, we may have the same words in our "name" but I have no affiliation with this account. I politely ask that this be reviewed one more time! Thank you and have an amazing day! Xezonakiii (talk) 17:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 00:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xezonakiii (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi! ^^ I would like for this to be reviewed again. I was falsely accused of being a sockpuppet of sockpuppeteer Averybenedictxezonaki. I do not know this man/woman and I have no affiliation with them. I am telling the truth but no one believes me because of my name. (Administrators also keep saying no because of the CheckUser thingy on my introduction page.) I am truly sorry if I am wasting anyone's time and I appreciate your time and consideration you took to review this again. I hope whoever reads this has an amazing day and yeah. Bye! ^^ -Jackson Xezonaki(The owner of this account.)Xezonakiii (talk)

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, meaning technical evidence supports it, so sockpuppetry is not in doubt. If technical evidence has led to the wrong conclusion, you will need to provide a plausible explanation for why technical evidence would indicate sockpuppetry. 331dot (talk) 14:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xezonakiii (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello again! I'm here to give a reasonable explanation that was asked of me to prove that the technical evidence that was used against me is false. First, I am gonna say again: I have no affiliation with this account! I don't know them, I never met them, and so on so forth. Anyways on to the point. So, let's rewind to May 23 when this account was created by me, Jackson. I was able to edit and everything was going great. But, as I was researching on the page Stan Lee, I was blocked from editing because someone in my ip range was blocked for Sockpuppetry after abusing who knows how many accounts. After further investigating, I figured out that persons user was Averybenedictxezonaki. I requested to be unblocked and I was declined the first time because I forgot to give my ip, declined a second time because someone put a checkuser thingy on my introduction page, and declined a third time as I was asked to give this explanation. The technical evidence that was used against me was my ip and username. Lets explain my username. My username is my last name, Xezonaki. So, I just figured it would be alright to have that username not knowing just hours earlier that person was blocked. And now my ip. So based on what ip addresses are, I'm guessing this person lives in my area. I looked at the Admin boards and there was a conversation going on in there about him faking to have a son or whatever and blamed the whole situation on that fictional being. Anyway, point being is that I am not this person, I have no affiliation with them (I PROMISE), and overall I was hoping I would have a great time here but mistakes happen. Again, I appreciate your time, consideration, and guidance on helping me get this block lifted. Cheers! - Jackson Xezonaki Xezonakiii (talk) 06:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is absurd. There is no doubt that you're a sock puppet. Talk page access revoked to prevent further time-wasting. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am entirely curious how, if what you say contains truth, this account on May 27, logged in to Wikipedia at 0845 UTC; and then seven minutes later, the Averybenedictxezonaki account logged into the same IP. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:11, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]