Universal Code of Conduct Facilitator

I work for or provide services to the Wikimedia Foundation, and this is the account I use for edits or statements I make in that role. However, the Foundation does not vet all my activity, so edits, statements, or other contributions made by this account may not reflect the views of the Foundation.

My current project involves facilitating discussions about the Universal Code of Conduct policy draft, especially in relation to enforcement and conflict resolution. You can share feedback with me here on my talk page, via email, or at a community venue by adding a notification.

Discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF) § UCOC Survey

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF) § UCOC Survey. Barkeep49 (talk) 23:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note Barkeep49, I replied there. Feel free to keep advising me here of other local discussions! Xeno (WMF) (talk) 20:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Code of Conduct News – Issue 1

Universal Code of Conduct News
Issue 1, June 2021Read the full newsletter

Welcome to the first issue of Universal Code of Conduct News! This newsletter will help Wikimedians stay involved with the development of the new code, and will distribute relevant news, research, and upcoming events related to the UCoC.

Please note, this is the first issue of UCoC Newsletter which is delivered to all subscribers and projects as an announcement of the initiative. If you want the future issues delivered to your talk page, village pumps, or any specific pages you find appropriate, you need to subscribe here.

You can help us by translating the newsletter issues in your languages to spread the news and create awareness of the new conduct to keep our beloved community safe for all of us. Please add your name here if you want to be informed of the draft issue to translate beforehand. Your participation is valued and appreciated.

Affiliate consultations – Wikimedia affiliates of all sizes and types were invited to participate in the UCoC affiliate consultation throughout March and April 2021. (continue reading)
2021 key consultations – The Wikimedia Foundation held enforcement key questions consultations in April and May 2021 to request input about UCoC enforcement from the broader Wikimedia community. (continue reading)
Roundtable discussions – The UCoC facilitation team hosted two 90-minute-long public roundtable discussions in May 2021 to discuss UCoC key enforcement questions. More conversations are scheduled. (continue reading)
Phase 2 drafting committee – The drafting committee for the phase 2 of the UCoC started their work on 12 May 2021. Read more about their work. (continue reading)
Diff blogs – The UCoC facilitators wrote several blog posts based on interesting findings and insights from each community during local project consultation that took place in the 1st quarter of 2021. (continue reading)

Movement Strategy and Governance Facilitator

My current major projects involve facilitating discussions about the Universal Code of Conduct and the Movement Charter. You can share feedback with me here on my talk page, via email, or at a community venue by adding a notification. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 23:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees election Campaign Activities

@Robertjamal12, EpicPupper, Ruby D-Brown, Ace2468, and Eric0892: Thanks for volunteering to get the word out about the ongoing election. The campaign period is now open, and the candidates have begun answering selected community questions and participating in various campaign events. There are a number of meet the candidates events planned: any thoughts about a meeting for local users? Xeno (WMF) (talk) 23:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertjamal12, EpicPupper, Ruby D-Brown, Ace2468, and Eric0892: As an update, I'm facilitating one of the upcoming meetings mentioned at the village pump. Please help spread the word. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 00:51, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Code of Conduct News – Issue 2

Universal Code of Conduct News
Issue 2, July 2021Read the full newsletter

Welcome to the second issue of Universal Code of Conduct News! This newsletter will help Wikimedians stay involved with the development of the new code and will distribute relevant news, research, and upcoming events related to the UCoC.

If you haven’t already, please remember to subscribe here if you would like to be notified about future editions of the newsletter, and also leave your username here if you’d like to be contacted to help with translations in the future.

Enforcement Draft Guidelines Review - Initial meetings of the drafting committee have helped to connect and align key topics on enforcement, while highlighting prior research around existing processes and gaps within our movement. (continue reading)
Targets of Harassment Research - To support the drafting committee, the Wikimedia Foundation has conducted a research project focused on experiences of harassment on Wikimedia projects. (continue reading)
Functionaries’ Consultation - Since June, Functionaries from across the various wikis have been meeting to discuss what the future will look like in a global context with the UCoC. (continue reading)
Roundtable Discussions - The UCoC facilitation team once again, hosted another roundtable discussion, this time for Korean-speaking community members and participants of other ESEAP projects to discuss the enforcement of the UCoC. (continue reading)
Early Adoption of UCoC by Communities - Since its ratification by the Board in February 2021, situations whereby UCoC is being adopted and applied within the Wikimedia community have grown. (continue reading)
New Timeline for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee - The CRC was originally expected to conclude by July 1. However, with the UCoC now expected to be in development until December, the timeline for the CRC has also changed. (continue reading)
Wikimania - The UCoC team is planning to hold a moderated discussion featuring representatives across the movement during Wikimania 2021. It also plans to have a presence at the conference’s Community Village. (continue reading)
Diff blogs - Check out the most recent publications about the UCoC on Wikimedia Diff blog. (continue reading)

Thanks for reading - we welcome feedback about this newsletter. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 17:33, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Code of Conduct News – Issue 3

Universal Code of Conduct News
Issue 3, August 2021Read the full newsletter

Welcome to the third issue of Universal Code of Conduct News! This newsletter will help Wikimedians stay involved with the development of the new code and will distribute relevant news, research, and upcoming events related to the UCoC.

If you haven’t already, please remember to subscribe here if you would like to be notified about future editions of the newsletter, and also leave your username here if you’d like to be contacted to help with translations in the future.

The Enforcement Draft Guidelines - The Enforcement Draft Guidelines for the Universal Code of Conduct has just been published on meta in different languages. These guidelines include some definitions of newly introduced terms and recommendations for local enforcement structures. (continue reading)
Enforcement Draft Guidelines Review - Before the enforcement guidelines are finalized, they must be reviewed and discussed by the community. The facilitation team has set up various discussion means throughout this review period. (continue reading)
Conversation Hours & Roundtables - To listen to community opinions and exchange ideas regarding enforcement draft guidelines proposed by the drafting committee, the UCoC facilitation team will be hosting weekly conversation hours. (continue reading)
Wikimania Wrap-up - The facilitation team hosted a Roundtable at Wikimania 2021, featuring some WMF trustees and staff. The session offered some insights on how the Enforcement Draft Guidelines came about, and what next steps are being imagined. (continue reading)
Translation - Because a considerable number of Wikimedians are not English speakers, and that UCoC applies to all members, projects across the wikimedia movement, it’s of a great importance to provide adequate language support throughout this process. (continue reading)
Diff blogs - Check out some interesting publications about the UCoC on Wikimedia Diff blog. (continue reading)
WMF's 2021 Board of Trustees election - Please read the Candidate Presentations and vote! (continue reading)

MNadzikiewicz (WMF) (talk) 22:38, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Code of Conduct News – Issue 4

Universal Code of Conduct News
Issue 4, October 2021Read the full newsletter

Welcome to the fourth issue of Universal Code of Conduct News! This newsletter will help Wikimedians stay involved with the development of the new code and will distribute relevant news, research, and upcoming events related to the UCoC.

If you haven’t already, please remember to subscribe here if you would like to be notified about future editions of the newsletter, and also leave your username here if you’d like to be contacted to help with translations in the future.

Enforcement Draft Guidelines Review Wrap-up - The Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Draft Guidelines Review will come to a close on 17 October 2021, after more than two months of extensive consultations. (continue reading)
Roundtable Discussions and Conversation Hours - Another successful roundtable session happened on September 18, 2021 to discuss the EDGR. One last conversation hour will be happening on October 15th, 2021. (continue reading)
Movement Charter Drafting Committee Elections - The Movement Charter Drafting Committee selection process has kicked off and will be open until October 25, 2021. Contributors to Wikimedia projects can elect their favorite candidates on to the committee. (continue reading)
New Direction for the Newsletter - As we round-up the consultation processes for the Universal Code of Conduct, the facilitation team is currently envisioning new directions for the newsletter. (continue reading)
Diff Blogs - Check out the most recent publications about the UCoC on Wikimedia Diff. (continue reading)

MNadzikiewicz (WMF) (talk) 20:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Poll closed early

The poll, contrary to your post at VPP, has already closed. DuncanHill (talk) 01:09, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the report DuncanHill: it appears the jump polls didn't get updated with the votewiki change. That's now been fixed and you should be able to access the vote locally Special:SecurePoll/vote/802 or via m:Special:SecurePoll/vote/391. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 01:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, worked for me. DuncanHill (talk) 01:24, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Movement Strategy and Governance News – Issue 6

Movement Strategy and Governance News
Issue 6, April 2022Read the full newsletter

Welcome to the sixth issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News! This revamped newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the Movement Charter, Universal Code of Conduct, Movement Strategy Implementation grants, Board of trustees elections and other relevant MSG topics.

This Newsletter will be distributed quarterly, while the more frequent Updates will also be delivered weekly. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive future issues of this newsletter.

Leadership Development - A Working Group is Forming! - The application to join the Leadership Development Working Group closed on April 10th, 2022, and up to 12 community members will be selected to participate in the working group. (continue reading)
Universal Code of Conduct Ratification Results are out! - The global decision process on the enforcement of the UCoC via SecurePoll was held from 7 to 21 March. Over 2,300 eligible voters from at least 128 different home projects submitted their opinions and comments. (continue reading)
Movement Discussions on Hubs - The Global Conversation event on Regional and Thematic Hubs was held on Saturday, March 12, and was attended by 84 diverse Wikimedians from across the movement. (continue reading)
Movement Strategy Grants Remain Open! - Since the start of the year, six proposals with a total value of about $80,000 USD have been approved. Do you have a movement strategy project idea? Reach out to us! (continue reading)
The Movement Charter Drafting Committee is All Set! - The Committee of fifteen members which was elected in October 2021, has agreed on the essential values and methods for its work, and has started to create the outline of the Movement Charter draft. (continue reading)
Introducing Movement Strategy Weekly - Contribute and Subscribe! - The MSG team have just launched the updates portal, which is connected to the various Movement Strategy pages on Meta-wiki. Subscriber to get up-to-date news about the various ongoing projects. (continue reading)
Diff Blogs - Check out the most recent publications about the UCoC on Wikimedia Diff. (continue reading)

Thanks for reading. Xeno (WMF) 02:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UCOC

Hi Xeno. I see you're asking (above) for more feedback on people's reactions to the UCOC. You and I have bumped into each other for ages, and I know you're a good person to talk with about these things. I'm not sure where to start, but I'll give this my best shot. It's been a very long time since I've blocked anyone or deleted an article (apart from WP:G7), but I still need the admin toolkit ... I was a TFA coordinator for 7 years and, from time to time, I still need to edit protected TFA stuff that's currently on the Main Page. The "affirmation" requirements of the UCOC are my biggest concern ... what do you think is going to wind up being required? I'm happy of course to sign on to general principles of fairness, and more than happy to hand off anything that's even slightly problematic to people who know more about these things than I do. I get why "training" may become important, but I think we all need some time to figure out exactly what it is that people need to be trained to do before we push training too hard. But the tone on "affirmations" is wrong ... I'm not willing to do anything that feels like pledging allegiance. That wouldn't sound like me, at all. - Dank (push to talk) 23:02, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dank, good to see you - thanks for dropping by! I appreciate you sharing your concerns with me. First, a big ole disclaimer: While I was originally worked for T&S Policy as a Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) Facilitator, I'm now a facilitator on the m:Movement Strategy and Governance team. So while my team supports T&S Policy with community engagement, we're not quite as close to the ground as the folks on that team. That said, I know a lot about the UCoC project and can provide a probably-useful off-the-cuff reply, and seek for further information if needed.

Right now, the form the affirmations should take has not been discussed (to my knowledge), since it's only in recommendation form and didn't yet move towards implementation. (I can think of examples of other 'affirmations': phab:L37 is as simple as checking a box and submitting an identifying handle to phabricator - and when I signed the access to non-public information agreement as a prospective member of the arbitration committee pseudonymously as "xeno", it was and remains totally fine. We also affirm the Terms of Use [along with subsidiary documents like the Licensing Policy] on each edit we submit - and the UCoC FAQ seems to indicate the code will be subsidiary to the ToU.)

The training as well remains similarly undefined. I know a number of other contributors were concerned about the affirmation and training recommendations, among other things (after all, I submitted their feedback =).

So where are we now? Following the community vote, the Board asked for the guidelines document to be sent back for further revisions.

Text from April 2022 - Board of Trustees on Next steps...

the Foundation to reconvene the drafting committee and to undertake another community engagement to refine the enforcement guidelines based on the community feedback received from the recently concluded vote.

For clarity, this feedback has been clustered into 4 sections as follows:

To identify the type, purpose, and applicability of the training;
To simplify the language for easier translation and comprehension by non-experts;
To explore the concept of affirmation, including its pros and cons;
To review the conflicting roles of privacy/victim protection and right to be heard.

Other issues may emerge during conversations, and particularly as the draft Enforcement Guidelines evolve, but we see these as the primary areas of concern for voters and are asking staff to facilitate review of these issues. After further engagement, the Foundation should re-run the community vote to evaluate the revamped Enforcement Outline to see if the new document is then ready for its official ratification.

So we are waiting to see what forms these things take in the new revisions, which will be for another community vote. If you have any additional specific input on those points, I would be happy to submit that for the drafting committee's attention and consideration. I hope this helps clear things up, though feel free to let me know if you have any additional questions. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 00:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also - if you're available, I'm helping facilitate a conversation with Maryana Iskander (Wikimedia Foundation's new CEO). I know she would benefit if you would share your thoughts, institutional memory, and ideas on how the Foundation can better serve the volunteer population in the upcoming year. This will be on Wednesday at 17:30 UTC; see m:Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan/2022-2023/Conversations for the Zoom link (sometimes subject to change!) and other details. Of course, feel free to pop into one of the other conversations if you're interested and the timing on the 27th doesn't work for you. All the best, Xeno (WMF) (talk) 00:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks kindly for the invite ... I've got doctors' appointments this week, but I'll try to tune in soon. Feel free to pass on what I said above to the relevant people if you think that's a good idea; should I add anything? - Dank (push to talk) 11:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dank: Ah, hppe it goes well - I think it should be recorded if you're interested. As far as adding anything (again, all off-the-cuff): I guess if you felt that one-or-the-other type of acknowledgement of the code would be okay (e.g. acknowledging that "you've read the code and won't violate the basic expectations" is okay, signing that "you will always step in to enforce it precisely as written: bar none, context be damned" is not), or that this-or-that type of training would be reasonable (after all, there is a wide range of training that have been spoken about: from reading a wiki page, to going through a training module, to completing an online interactive course, to attending an admin's retreat... that last one may have been tongue-in-cheek!). Xeno (WMF) (talk) 23:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Healthwise, the odds are in my favor and I'm not too worried. - Dank (push to talk) 03:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The UCOC says that behaviors should be "founded in respect, civility, collegiality, solidarity and good citizenship ... without expectations based on age, mental or physical disabilities, physical appearance, national, religious, ethnic and cultural background, caste, social class, language fluency, sexual orientation, gender identity, sex or career field." I've made well over 100k edits in my 14.5 years on the English Wikipedia, and I think I can make a case based on my edits that that's been my position all along, but I'm open to talking it over if someone thinks otherwise. I'm also willing to read over any training materials that anyone wants to provide, and to think about whether I need to update my understanding of the relevant issues. That's roughly all I'm prepared to give; the whole time I've been editing, I've made it clear that I prefer not to get involved in contentious enforcement matters ... other Wikipedians are more interested in these things than I am, and they do a better job with it. - Dank (push to talk) 14:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not pushing this, and definitely not in a hurry, but it would be a relief to know at some point if this position is going to be enough to count as "compliance" among the people who care about such things. If you find out, let me know. - Dank (push to talk) 16:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From my reading, I imagine that will be fine Dank - there's nothing in the guidelines that compels individual administrators to participate in enforcement if they're not interested in doing so. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 00:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that helps a lot. - Dank (push to talk) 02:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, continuing from here: Xeno, our gut feeling is that it's too soon for the RfC you're proposing. I'm not sure when the time would be right ... but it's not now. The main problem is that the current affirmation language under discussion (here, AFAIK) is "The following individuals should be required to affirm (through signed declaration or other format to be decided) they will acknowledge and adhere to the Universal Code of Conduct." Just a suggestion: ask the people who like this language (publicly, privately, whatever) what they would do if they had to make a choice between weakening the language to just "I've read it" (without mentioning adherence), or allowing more time for the English Wikipedia community to develop the language into something that we can get behind, on our own pages and in ways that feel familiar to us. - Dank (push to talk) 20:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC) (Or if there's a better place for me to raise my concerns, let me know.) - Dank (push to talk) 21:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For now what I've done is posted to WP:VPP and WP:AN with a pointer to the discussion on Meta-Wiki. You could add your thoughts there: m:UCOCEGRD. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 22:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much, I'll just watch what develops for now. - Dank (push to talk) 22:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dank: As a courtesy note - I hope this is alright, I've shared a brief sentence from above (I get why "training" may become important, but I think we all need some time to figure out exactly what it is that people need to be trained to do before we push training too hard.) as an exemplar in a thread on the proposed MS Forum. Barkeep49: I wonder if you wanted to provide additional perspective there? I noticed recent drafting committee summaries mentioned the topic. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 00:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I get to have a pretty loud voice in this process Xeno. I think it important to leave the MS Forums (and other places) about substantive UCoC comments (vs, say, the process oriented discussion we're having at AN) to those who don't get to do the actual drafting. But I am following the threads there (and have participated in some other discussions). Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Xeno, I said above that I thought it was too soon for that RfC you're proposing ... but this (reflecting a shift toward voluntary, not mandatory, training) is at least somewhat encouraging, so I withdraw my objection. (I don't have any idea how the RfC would turn out, of course, I'm just saying, things are at least moving in the right direction, so now I don't have a gut feeling one way or the other.) - Dank (push to talk) 17:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the additional thoughts Dank. I've also been reading the public drafting committee summaries and Barkeep49's individual updates with interest. About a local RfC; it probably now makes sense to wait for a fresh draft. I did provide links on Template:CENT and at a few local venues pointing editors to the Meta discussion. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on this. - Dank (push to talk) 15:09, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

request to volunteer

hi. i would like to volunteer to help with publicizing the elections for the board. coudl you please reply, and let me know how to do so? I appreciate your help. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 19:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sm8900: Thanks for your interest and offer of help! Right now, affiliate representatives are deciding on a set of questions for candidates to answer. The answers will be provided on the MS Forum for ease of reference and translation. After that, affiliate representatives will vote from 1 to 15 July to determine which 6 candidates will move forward to the wider campaign period and community vote at the end of August. See m:BE2022#Timeline. So the best would be for you and others @Election Volunteers: to prepare for campaign period starting in mid-July: think about good ways to inform local editors of the events and opportunity to propose more questions and also statements to be entered into a voting advice application to help people come to a decision on which candidates best align with their views. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Movement Strategy and Governance News – Issue 7

Movement Strategy and Governance News
Issue 7, July-September 2022Read the full newsletter

Welcome to the 7th issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News! The newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the implementation of Wikimedia's Movement Strategy recommendations, other relevant topics regarding Movement governance, as well as different projects and activities supported by the Movement Strategy and Governance (MSG) team of the Wikimedia Foundation.

The MSG Newsletter is delivered quarterly, while the more frequent Movement Strategy Weekly will be delivered weekly. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive future issues of this newsletter.

Movement sustainability: Wikimedia Foundation's annual sustainability report has been published. (continue reading)
Improving user experience: recent improvements on the desktop interface for Wikimedia projects. (continue reading)
Safety and inclusion: updates on the revision process of the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines. (continue reading)
Equity in decisionmaking: reports from Hubs pilots conversations, recent progress from the Movement Charter Drafting Committee, and a new white paper for futures of participation in the Wikimedia movement. (continue reading)
Stakeholders coordination: launch of a helpdesk for Affiliates and volunteer communities working on content partnership. (continue reading)
Leadership development: updates on leadership projects by Wikimedia movement organizers in Brazil and Cape Verde. (continue reading)
Internal knowledge management: launch of a new portal for technical documentation and community resources. (continue reading)
Innovate in free knowledge: high-quality audiovisual resources for scientific experiments and a new toolkit to record oral transcripts. (continue reading)
Evaluate, iterate, and adapt: results from the Equity Landscape project pilot (continue reading)
Other news and updates: a new forum to discuss Movement Strategy implementation, upcoming Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees election, a new podcast to discuss Movement Strategy, and change of personnel for the Foundation's Movement Strategy and Governance team. (continue reading)

RamzyM (WMF) 01:39, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Senior Committee Support Manager

I work for or provide services to the Wikimedia Foundation, and this is the account I use for edits or statements I make in that role. However, the Foundation does not vet all my activity, so edits, statements, or other contributions made by this account may not reflect the views of the Foundation.

I oversee staff support functions for several volunteer committees, including Affiliations Committee, Ombuds Commission, Arbitration Committees, and the Case Review Committee. My team works to ensures these groups have access to the support they need to operate smoothly. You can share feedback with me on my talk page, via email, or at a community venue by adding a notification. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 23:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Code of Conduct / Filing a case

>:Hi, I am searching where and how to file a case. I was searching on Meta where I was not successful, then I found that one here on the English Wikipedia, where I read that a U4C might have to do something with it, but the link there does not lead to somewhere known and works really slow.

You seem rather active in pages relating to the UCOC and maybe you can help me advise me a bit how to make this possible. I was blocked in the German Wikipedia after 8 good faith edits and my unblock request I filed after I noticed difficulties while applying for the Wikipedia Library due to the block, was denied even though I made it rather clear I have no interest in editing in the German wikipedia. Now I again had some sort of difficulties in voting on the UCOC, and I do not want the block anymore and want to file a case. I was OUTED by a former admin in the German wikipedia also at least twice. This evidence I'd prefer to provide per email for now, I actually also do not have an issue with going public but I was a new editor at the time and was outed, harassed (hounded in the English wikipedia for reporting in the German wikipedia for 8 good faith edits is fine example for hounding), and indeffed in the German Wikipedia for 8 good faith edits in the English wikipedia, without me allowing to defend myself. This is not Wikipedia for me and I have no interest in editing in the German wikipedia, but I want to be unblocked so it doesn't interfere on other wikipedia projects (as it did while applying for the TWL, and probably also on other occasions like when voting on the UCOC).Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw that you were not really active the last few months. I'll likely search somewhere else as well and update if I found a solution. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

During the Steward elections I was encouraged to perform another unblock request which I have done per email as I can't edit the German wikipedia, but this one was denied rather fast. I also argued with outing, but this doesn't seem to be a violation at the German wikipedia (which I don't believe of course, I see it as a selective appliance of policy). So I'd be glad to know how else we can proceed to so this block doesn't interfere with my editing in other wikimedia projects.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking volunteers for the next step in the Universal Code of Conduct process

More languages • Please help translate to other languages.

Hello,

As follow-up to the message about the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines by Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Vice Chair, Shani Evenstein Sigalov, I am reaching out about the next steps. I want to bring your attention to the next stage of the Universal Code of Conduct process, which is forming a building committee for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C). I invite community members with experience and deep interest in community health and governance to nominate themselves to be part of the U4C building committee, which needs people who are:

Community members in good standing
Knowledgeable about movement community processes, such as, but not limited to, policy drafting, participatory decision making, and application of existing rules and policies on Wikimedia projects
Aware and appreciative of the diversity of the movement, such as, but not limited to, languages spoken, identity, geography, and project type
Committed to participate for the entire U4C Building Committee period from mid-May - December 2023
Comfortable with engaging in difficult, but productive conversations
Confidently able to communicate in English

The Building Committee shall consist of volunteer community members, affiliate board or staff, and Wikimedia Foundation staff.

The Universal Code of Conduct has been a process strengthened by the skills and knowledge of the community and I look forward to what the U4C Building Committee creates. If you are interested in joining the Building Committee, please either sign up on the Meta-Wiki page, or contact ucocprojectwikimedia.org by May 12, 2023. Read more on Meta-Wiki.

Best regards,

Xeno (WMF) 18:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

U4C - question about the fundamentals

Dear Xeno, I see you have been closely involved in the shaping U4C. I have one fundamental question that it is being surprisingly difficult for me to figure out. I see lots of pages and links to deep technical discussion, but I am missing a basic broad overview: Where can I find a page with a basic introduction to the need for this committee? And, where can I find a list of concrete examples of harassment in Wikimedia/Wikipedia, that I assume are the basis for the creation of this Committee? Thank you. Al83tito (talk) 15:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let me hone-in on my question. I see some general explanations in the FAQs. My question is more specifically why harassment has been an issue in Wikipedia/Wikimedia. So I only seek here an answer to my second original question: where can I find a list of concrete examples of harassment in Wikimedia/Wikipedia, that I assume are the basis for the creation of this Committee? Thank you. Al83tito (talk) 15:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Al83tito: Thanks for reaching out. The Universal Code of Conduct project launched following the 2030 Movement Strategy recommendations (particularly Provide for Safety and Inclusion) and this Board resolution on Healthy Community Culture, Inclusivity, and Safe Spaces.

This report may also be interesting: it's a summary of consultations that followed an earlier look into the footprint of behavioural policies across multiple Wikipedia languages and other Wikimedia projects. There are deeper dives per language, as well. One of the findings was that participants in smaller communities typically spent more time writing content than actually setting out policies and guidelines for user behaviour. That's to be expected, yet as communities grew the lack of common understanding could present challenges. Creating a Universal Code of Conduct as a base framework avoids communities having to start from scratch as they grow, while setting a consistent expectation for behaviour in the movement.

For examples of the types of harassment that may be encountered by participants on Wikimedia projects, you could refer to meta:Harassment and Wikipedia:Harassment. The m:WikiLearn course Addressing Harassment Online may help provide added context as well. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 02:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]