User talk:Xcliff06

Moon Knight (TV series)

Hi. Please see WP:MCURS for reliable sources to cite MCU material on, which does not include the MCU Wiki as it is a user-generated source. WP:IMDB also establishes IMDb as an unreliable source, also being user-generated. — SirDot (talk) 04:30, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to fix people’s mistakes about two people of Sofia Asir and Danu but it’s a same actress and no one believes me for some reason. Xcliff06 (talk) 04:38, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have to become an editor of Wikipedia pages like actors / actress and films / series I tried to tell one of these editors about two people of Sofia’s in Moon Knight and for some reason no one is getting my point and not believing me they’ll find out and be wronged Xcliff06 (talk) 04:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because you're asking people to trust you and your unreliable source CreecregofLife (talk) 05:38, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About Sofia Danu

Your recent editing history at Moon Knight (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Alex_21_TALK 04:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Listen about what I said when they reveal that’s the only one actress of Sofia when the fifth episode drops they will prove me right if I’m right I’m just becoming a victim about this incident edit, and if I’m wrong that there’s two Sofias I’ll apologize about my actions Xcliff06 (talk) 05:13, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You keep asking us to listen when we have no reason to trust you CreecregofLife (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You’ll see when episode 5 is released on Wednesday but I’m really sorry for that Xcliff06 (talk) 05:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"You'll see" is not a reason CreecregofLife (talk) 05:37, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know that but if you’re right about 2 Sofias than I apologize I really do wish that you could believe me, but I guess if you’re right all along but I’m gonna quit Wikipedia if I’m wrong Xcliff06 (talk) 05:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's rather overdramatic CreecregofLife (talk) 14:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CreecregofLife and @Alex 21 do you believe @Xcliff06 now because @Favre1fan93 believed him he notice that Sofia Danu and Asir is the same actress so i appreciated what he supported him but we don't know if they're gonna credit Sofia Danu or Asir in the series. So apologize to @Xcliff06 after what you guys did to turn him to a victim. ECliff06 (talk) 02:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We did no such thing. He did not make his case. Just because he turned out correct does not make what he did right CreecregofLife (talk) 02:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Xcliff06 and ECliff06: Are the two of these accounts the same person? You have very similar names.

And we did no such thing. Read WP:VNT, concerning verifiability, not truth. We simply included what was verifiable. -- Alex_21_TALK 03:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no we're different people ECliff06 (talk) 03:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your names are almost identical, bar one letter; I'm debating on opening a WP:SOCK investigation, if there's anything you would like to say beforehand. -- Alex_21_TALK 03:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

that's not my account User (talk) 04:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An investigation is now open at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xcliff06‎. -- Alex_21_TALK 04:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, Xcliff06, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Breathe (upcoming film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Breathe (upcoming film). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. echidnaLives - talk - edits 00:50, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Skydance Media

Excuse me but i'm making a workgroup for Skydance Media and since you edited Simon Cellan Jones‎, the film he's directing is sort of part of Skydance Media and we have a draft titled Draft:The Family Plan. We don't know when it will be out but... would you like to join the group to help support Skydance and it's upcoming Apple Studios film? BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 22:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No i'm good but thanks for asking XtraCpart06 (talk) 22:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Holiday Road (upcoming film)

Hello Xcliff06,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Holiday Road (upcoming film) for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Holiday Road (upcoming film) to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Supercell (film), you may be blocked from editing. Mike Allen 16:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What about the poster, is it unsourced to you? XtraCpart06 (talk) 18:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2024

Please note that a new day is added when the day has started in the first timezone. Marbe166 (talk) 08:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]