User talk:Xaosflux/Archive23
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Xaosflux. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
MFD notice
Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Selfworm/Userboxes/NotCatholic_(2nd_nomination) As you are an editor involved with the the previous discussion, I am notifying you that I have relisted it for mfd. Thank you. --Flamgirlant 11:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Reactivating WikiProject Rave
I just became aware of the project so I joined and I have reactivated it from its status of inactive – Wikipedia:WikiProject Rave. __meco 10:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Ray Chi article deletion
Hi, I wrote the article on Ray Chi that you recently deleted. I did not have computer access for a few days and didn't get the message until today. I could have easily sited or referenced various items in the article and wish I would have had more time to do so. Is there any way to get the article back? I was actually going to add to it soon because he's done more work lately that would make him even more noteworthy than he already is. Shatner1 21:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 26 | 25 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
EndUN Userbox
Hi, you recently participated in the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DieWeisseRose/Userboxes/EndUN discussion. I have reluctantly submitted the closing statement by User:Tony Sidaway for deletion review. Please consider taking a look at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_1#User:DieWeisseRose.2FUserboxes.2FEndUN. Thanks. --DieWeisseRose 02:41, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 27 | 2 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:26, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Bot Approval BoxCrawler
I have a request pending at the requests for approval page and would like your input (as you are part of the BAG) if it's not too much trouble. I'm glad to answer any questions or concerns you may have. Adam McCormick 23:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Test Run is complete, edits may be seen here Adam McCormick 06:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have responded to the errors you found, and have changed the bot accordingly, please let me know if there are more problems or when I can run again Adam McCormick 20:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have responded to your comment. We keep a list of infoboxes at the project page, and I have left several links at the test review. Adam McCormick 23:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have also changed the bot to respond to any div box (either <div> tags or '{|') that uses the class infobox. Let me know when I can Run another trial. Thanks! Adam McCormick 18:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Retrial has been run and the rusults may be seen here Adam McCormick 04:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- I haven't heard anything else about the trial in about a week, is there something else you'd like me to do to get approval? Adam McCormick 02:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Retrial has been run and the rusults may be seen here Adam McCormick 04:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have responded to the errors you found, and have changed the bot accordingly, please let me know if there are more problems or when I can run again Adam McCormick 20:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 28 | 9 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
My RfB
 |
Thank you, Xaosflux, for participating in my RfB, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3). |
Why
why did you delete my request for adminship page to nominate myself--Physik 14:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
MFD
I've transcluded Portal:Catholicism/Popes in to Portal:Pope/Popes to prevent forking, but to allow portal consistancy if anyone ever wanted it. Do you think this is a good fix, or do you want to continue with the MFD? Thanks, — xaosflux Talk 03:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- The point is that Portal:Pope/Popes is not used anywhere. Do you think there's some reason to keep it? --Abu badali (talk) 03:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply, I've reverted myself. I don't really have an opinion one way or another on that page, but do note that although it is orphaned, it is only a week old, have you talk'ed the creator?. — xaosflux Talk 04:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm... I haven't noticed it is only one week old! --Abu badali (talk) 04:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply, I've reverted myself. I don't really have an opinion one way or another on that page, but do note that although it is orphaned, it is only a week old, have you talk'ed the creator?. — xaosflux Talk 04:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 29 | 16 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
hey your not nice by sending that message
well did you write that? Just please take all the cuss words out.i'm sorry i deleated it just fix it up.i didn like all those cuss words in it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SilverQuarters (talk • contribs).
- Replied on your talk. — xaosflux Talk 23:32, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
its me SilverQuarters
- look on your talk
- Well ok do you want to be friends answer back on my talk.ok.tell me if your a boy or girl it dosent matter either one is fine
- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SilverQuarters (talk • contribs).
you can go to User:SilverQuarters and type anything you want.but one rule no cuss words. from, SilverQuarters 13:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
MfD thanks
Thanks. I meant to explicitly include the subpages but forgot. --ElKevbo 03:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
UCFD
It is actually not archived yet, but I was using that edit summary as it will be there soon and if I use the current location, no one will be able to find it later. For now it is still @ Wikipedia:User categories for discussion#Category:Psuedoreligionist Wikipedians --After Midnight 0001 04:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- You are welcome. BTW, this wouldn't have happened if we used page-per-day for UCFD like we do for CFD, but I don't feel like setting that all up. See you later. --After Midnight 0001 04:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 30 | 23 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
As you are already aware, Category:Psuedoreligionist Wikipedians and its subcategories, including Category:Discordian Wikipedians, Category:Flying Spaghetti Monsterist Wikipedians, Category:SubGenius Wikipedians, and others, have been deleted. That deletion is now up for review. If you have anything you'd like to say on the subject, now is the time. If you know of any other editors who might have something to say on the subject, pass the word. If, on the other hand, you are not interested in the slightest, feel free to delete this. — Bigwyrm watch mewake me 09:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Vote at CfD
Hello. I think you have used sound reasoning in saying that some of the generation categories should be deleted and some not - I agree this could be beneficial. However, I was wondering if you would alter your vote to say that the "Wikipedians in their XXs" should be kept and the "Generation XYZ" should be deleted. I say this for two reasons (A) which generation one considers him/herself is POV, and there is even conflict among sociologists about which Generation should be called what and at what ages; (2) The "Wikipedians in their XXs" is not POV and editors are added and updated automatically if they use one of several user age templates, thus requiring less maintenance. I would imagine that these have a stronger chance of surviving and actually being useful in the future. Depending on what you decide, you can change your vote here.--Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 15:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
A little of your time
Would you be able to take a little time to look at user Mind meal (talk, edits), who is incivil, makes threats and tries to intimidate editors. Others have attempted to advise the user, but perhaps you might be able to give it a try.
Please urge the use of edit Summaries and the Preview button to reduce edit clutter. Thank you. Hu 04:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 31 | 30 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't quite understand why you changed the speedy-delete tag on this article to a prod. Explain, please. Realkyhick 05:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Response is on my page, since you copied my first message there; helps keep things organized. Realkyhick 16:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 32 | 6 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Bot Error
Yep, this is why we have BRFA. I noticed another serious error, so I went and reverted the edits, as it made the talkpage below act very unusually. Please fix the error I detailed and re-run the trial for 5 edits. Sorry for all the mucking around! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 02:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:SickGirlInPyjamas.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:SickGirlInPyjamas.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Go away bot, you are too fast! — xaosflux Talk 02:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
SilverQuarters 13:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for giving that welcoming page Xaosflux.I hope you leave more messagess.And I didnt know it was vandilism by deleting stuff.i hope no more vandils will mess with WIKIPEDIA.
WP:CVU status
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- what pages of mine are being consitered for deletion??? just wondering b/c i am unsure of what article(s) or pages your are refuring too... thanks, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 23:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk. — xaosflux Talk 01:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Reply: Thank you for letting me know. Ramírez 22:00, August 10 2007 (UTC)
You wrote, "delist csd, can always be redirected somewhere else, or made in to an atrticle". Yes both are possiblities but neither seem to be happening. In the mean time I find the current redirection confusing. Deletion doesn't prevent addition when a contributer appears. Will you please reconsider? Conrad T. Pino 06:28, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
User:Justlit is a hoaxer who made up Laila Richard Sadeq, and is claiming that his made-up person was the actress who played Stevie Sanchez. That makes Stevie Sanchez a hoax. Corvus cornix 19:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
CVU Status
Thanks for the heads-up (via Fluxbot) about the proposed action against CVU. I was out of town and wasn't able to submit my $0.02, but from what I read, it looked like a WP:POINT nomination. I'm glad to see that its still around. —Travistalk 00:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
This has been listed at WP:DRV. -Nard 04:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
StatusBot
Great, it can start if you unblock it. I had it indef-blocked as it didn't shut down automatically, and I didn't have access to the toolserver to force it to shut down. It should restart editing as soon as it's unblocked (within 5 minutes). Thanks! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 00:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks :-) And AIV is how I got it blocked the first time. AIV seemed the fastest, even though not the most appropriate (not vandalism). Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 00:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Due to the way the SQL query works, it should work more efficiently for a user that has edited sooner. Although this may cause slightly higher edit rates (the query is the bottleneck I am using for timing) it should stay within the limit and it should update happily. Also, to encourage participation/awareness, I have posted a message on WP:VP/M. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 00:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 33 | 13 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 21:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
BJAODN arbitration
You have been added to the ongoing BJAODN arbitration regarding your undeletion of all of the BJAODN subpages. --Cyde Weys 22:43, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 16:06, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
User Talk Deletion
Hello, I've made the revision on the User talk:AlephGamma page. The rebuild excludes personal names that from my angle need to be deleted due to a recent identity theft incident. As a paranoid precaution, I would like the page deleted and then reposted with the original content, that is... everything under the ==New== header. I can do this myself. AlephGamma 16:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost and BJAODN
You're listed as an involved party in the BJAODN case. The Wikipedia Signpost will be covering the events in this week's issue. Alkivar asked that I talk to him to avoid misconstruing his words, so in the interest of fairness I'm offering you the opportunity to do so as well.
I'd be happy to talk to any/all of you regarding the case, but I don't have any questions to ask at this point, and won't be able to write anything until Monday morning UTC, at the earliest. If you have any general statements you'd like to make to me, to clear up any misconceptions, or clarify your opinion, please feel free to e-mail me. Also, if you have any quotes in particular that you think best qualify your point, either published on-wiki, or sent to me via e-mail, I'd appreciate them. Since the case has many important issues that need to be mentioned, I want to make sure that I don't miss anything, or misrepresent anyone's views.
(Any uninvolved parties who wish to send me an e-mail can, of course, do so as well). Ral315 » 06:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Phoenix (programming language)
I had put this obviously promotional article up for speedy deletion (unsuccessfully), and I see you deleted it. Thank you; you've made Wikipedia a better place. Thehotelambush 03:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 34 | 20 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Ye he!
When you blocked Longcatislooooooooooooong, yo made a typo! Account, not accoutn! I spotted that typo there! lol -- PNiddy Go! 04:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Your deletion of Chaim Dov Keller article
Hello Xaosflux: Could you please explain why you chose to delete the article about Rabbi Chaim Dov Keller as reported: "01:09, 6 August 2007 Xaosflux deleted "Chaim Dov Keller" (content was: 'dated prod|concern = concern|not notable under WP:BIO|month = July|day = 31|year = 2007|time = 02:52)"? Why did you prod this article about a very famous currently living rabbi? Did you consult some editors familair with this topic? Did you place a question at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism or at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism? Rabbi Chaim Dov Keller is probably one of the best known rabbis in Chicago at the present time. He is not a congregational rabbi, but serves as the rosh yeshiva ("dean") of the largest yeshiva in Chicago. He is mentioned in key articles relating to Haredi Judaism. A Google search for "Chaim Dov Keller" yields over 470 hits (a large number for such a person in the world of Orthodox Judaism) many connected to numerous and significant publications in the world of American Orthodox Judaism and particularly Haredi Judaism for which he is leading spokesman and scholar with Agudath Israel of America. He co-heads the Telshe yeshiva (Chicago) and he has played a major role is speaking out on the issue of the messianic claims concerning Rabbi M.M. Schneerson of Lubavitch, see Controversies of Chabad#The soul as "the essence of God". Kindly restore the article ASAP. Thank you, IZAK 13:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Reply on your talk. — xaosflux Talk 00:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you, see my response there. IZAK 07:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has adopted a motion in the above arbitration case, stating, "As the underlying dispute has been satisfactorily resolved by the community, and as no evidence of bad-faith actions by any party has been presented, this case is closed with no further actions being taken." This notice is given by a clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad 03:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
StatusBot Clone
A clone of StatusBot would be very difficult - my code to not rely on the toolserver database doesn't work properly, and i'd need to rewrite that. Another clone on the toolserver seems a bit pointless, so until that bit of code is properly working, a clone wouldn't be feasible. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 04:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Wordforge
Hello! I just wanted to make sure the new account on WF is really you. :)
If it is, please drop me a note as to what permissions you'd like (I'm guessing admin,checkuser?) Thanks! ~Kylu (u|t) 17:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
The Surreal Barnstar
|
The Surreal Barnstar
| |
| Without your wildcard act, the BJAODN MfD would never have received enough community input to decide the fate of that seven year old project. As the nominator of that MfD and for playing a significant roll in prompting 113 unique editors to participate in that MfD, I hereby award you The Surreal Barnstar. -- Jreferee (Talk) 07:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC) |
Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 35 | 27 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Category change
I was a little surprised to see the change to Category:United States thoroughbred racing Hall of Fame inductees without notice to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Thoroughbred racing. "Thoroughbred" is a proper name that requires a capital as officially recorded by The Jockey Club [1], the breed Registry for Thoroughbred horses in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. Would you please revert this to its proper title. Thanx. (cc-Wikipedia:WikiProject Thoroughbred racing) Handicapper 18:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Moved to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 August 31 — xaosflux Talk 01:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
No, you are wrong to do what you did. Please note, that this type of thing should not be up for discussion, it is an error that simply should be reversed. This is a case of proper spelling, not choice. Please correct the situation. Thanx. Handicapper 14:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Public Radio Talent Quest (Talk page)
I just started a discussion trying to figure out why my entry was deleted and you deleted my discussion. See my user talk page about how my entry came up for deletion. Then look again at the entry that is in question, that is if you can, I can't read any discussion or anything about my entry as they are all deleted and I can't view anything.
No discussion is a complete offense and not allowing a defense to support my entry is like stealing something that was mine to begin with. I shared the information with you and the whole global community that might be interested in knowing about an item. That is what encyclopedias do isn't it?
Please restore my conversation and point out the error in my writing. If you can restore my conversation and my entry and let's talk about how it doesn't comply with the terms of the site.
I'll bet that if you go back to the beginning you'll find that it was deleted out of a prejudice and not because of content.
But of course you probably know more than anyone else. You don't have to work with people you just delete material and exclude a dialogue and diplomacy.
We could make the world a better place, if you want to, but destroying all will not accomplish your goals. Being destructive never brought about good growth. TheGreatWhiteBuffalo 02:28, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk. — xaosflux Talk 03:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Per your request on my userpage, I've undeleted Talk:Public Radio Talent Quest and tagged it to delay for at least 5 days. The Criteria for speedy deletion recognizes that talk pages without associated articles are generally speedily deletable. My deletion was without any bearing related to the deletion of the article (that I did not delete). Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 03:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- P.S. A discussion on a talk page of a deleted article is generally not an effective means of having it restored. Better methods would be to contact the deleting admin directly (perhaps asking if they would consider listing on WP:AFD instead) or bringing it up at Deletion Review. Thanks, — xaosflux Talk 03:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Per your request on my userpage, I've undeleted Talk:Public Radio Talent Quest and tagged it to delay for at least 5 days. The Criteria for speedy deletion recognizes that talk pages without associated articles are generally speedily deletable. My deletion was without any bearing related to the deletion of the article (that I did not delete). Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 03:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thank You :) TheGreatWhiteBuffalo 03:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Please have a bit more patience and courtesy in the future. You jumped on my placeholder while I was creating the content, leaving a bad taste in my mouth. --John Navas 04:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- (from your talk), No offense meant there, was clearing out the backlog at CAT:CSD after someone else nominated this page for speedy deletion as being empty. Pages speedily deleted under that context are without any prejudice for recreation. Unfortunately, we get tons of empty pages created by others (even well-meaning editors) that never get content added to them beyond a few words, a tag, or something like "coming soon" that deletion is just the best step. I've gone back and restored the history if you are interested in it. Thank you and happy editing. — xaosflux Talk 06:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanation and suggestion, which makes sense, and which I'll follow in the future. --John Navas 14:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
re:Changing archives
Both of those solutions are uneffective in terms of not being linked to the name anymore. — Moe ε 04:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- See User talk:Centrx for a more elaborate answer. Thanks for your concern though. — Moe ε 04:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 36 | 3 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 05:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Much Thanks for the Invite
Thanks for the invite to the Wiki Counter Vandalisim Unit, I'm Honored. Carlo V. Sexron 18:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Protection
- Please provide a rationale for protection of Help:Modifying and creating policy and Wikipedia:Accountability.
Hello? I've noticed you protected Help:Modifying and creating policy without providing a motivation on the talk poage, and you've declared you will protect Wikipedia:Accountability, but also have not provided further rationale there yet.
Could you please provide a detailed rationale for both these actions?
Thank you. :-)
--Kim Bruning 04:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- replied on your talk. — xaosflux Talk 16:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your time! :-) --Kim Bruning 19:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Old SALT vs New SALT
This is mostly an FYI to you as an admin who still uses the old, templated method for salting pages. That method of salting pages is depricated, and the template is now up for deletion. While things can still change, the current discussion definitely looks headed towards deletion. Assuming that this happens, you will no longer be able to salt pages with the old method, and will need to begin using the newer salting method that involves cascading protection on the title, and allows recreation to be blocked while still having no article at the name, leaving it as a red link. This new method of salting is centered at WP:PT, and the instructions for how to make it work are there as well. - TexasAndroid 13:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 37 | 10 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 21:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
please block this contributor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/24.5.196.172
This person has erased the privacy section 5 times, without any explanation or justification.
They were blocked by wikipedia on August 10, but they have apparently been unblocked and are continuing to vandalize the article. Twice on September 5.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Etsy&action=history
- (cur) (last) 03:27, 5 September 2007 24.5.196.172 (Talk) (13,761 bytes) (→External links) (undo)
removing a link
- (cur) (last) 03:27, 5 September 2007 24.5.196.172 (Talk) (13,806 bytes) (→Privacy) (undo)
completly erasing the privacy section, again
Please permanently block this IP from editing wikipedia articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.252.66 (talk • contribs)
- Replied on your talk. — xaosflux Talk 21:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)