User talk:XanderK09

This is XanderK09's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jucika (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lovkal was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi! Thank you for introducing me to this interesting topic, I feel like this article really belongs in mainspace, it just needs a few more mentions from reliable sources to prove notability and thus be fit for publication! I see a bunch of sources in the Hungarian and Japanese Wikipedia articles on the subject, and I would help add them myself but I don't have that much energy today. I hope you continue to improve the article! Let me know if there are any questions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jucika and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ lovkal (talk) 11:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Lovkal, I'm glad you find the subject interesting! I heard about it from a post I found, and wanted more people to know about it. I also noticed that you added alot of Hungarian sources, and even a whole history section that I had not known about. Should I submit the draft as is, since there are now 9 sources and more information, or should I keep searching for more sources, on other wikipedias? XanderK09 (talk) 13:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

：：＠XanderK09 Some more information was my thought, but I see you've already done that. Nice. Submit it and I can accept it and we'll let it grow from there also! ~ lovkal (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lovkal Thank you so much! This is my first Wikipedia article, I'm so glad you want to accept it!! Submitting it now, thanks again! XanderK09 (talk) 00:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XanderK09! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ lovkal (talk) 11:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jucika has been accepted

Jucika, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ lovkal (talk) 09:55, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ENA (web series) (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ENA (web series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Cash (Youtuber, Musician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Cash (Youtuber, Musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Cash (Youtuber, Musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:XanderK09/ENA(web series)

Hello, XanderK09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:XanderK09/ENA(web series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]