User talk:Xaltrebor01

February 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Benjamin Lax, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Liu1126 (talk) 21:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it all possible to have a phone conversation with you to add a little bit more of the family information which I doubt would disturb the "encyclopedic quality".

I just attended an event yesterday, honoring my father, were many questions were asked about family.

I would appreciate family rights to supersede and less connected and encyclopedic habitually.

I would also like to re-add the picture that was previously at the top of the Wikipedia article about my father for so many years.

I would deeply appreciate the small cooperation, as it would greatly enhance the smiles and joy of those who knew him, and wouldn't be of harm to anybody who doesn't of which this is no matter.

Your assistance would be greatly appreciated in helping me achieve these two matters as I am struggling with the software, and do not feel like struggling anymore or dealing with anything that isn't harmonious within family preference . Xaltrebor01 (talk) 21:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Macrobiotic diet

Please do not insert inappropriate short descriptions into articles like you did at macrobiotic diet. The text you added "Enlightened Healing diet" is WP:OR and a violation of WP:Fringe. There is no WP:RS for that claim on the article. Psychologist Guy (talk) 16:54, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Macrobiotic diet shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Psychologist Guy (talk) 00:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]