User talk:Xagent86

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xagent86.

Welcome to my Talk Page

Here is where you can leave a message. Use the post a comment feature. I might clean messages up from time to time or archive them, depending on how I feel. Please sign your comments when you post here using ~~~~ for your username and timestamp.

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Xagent86! I'm Xinoph. I noticed that you were new and/or have yet to receive any messages so I just thought I'd pop in to say "hello". Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it's so big but we won't bite so Be Bold and get what you know down about U.S. politics! If you do make a mistake, that's fine, we'll assume good faith and just correct you: it'll take a few seconds maximum! Here, however, are a few links to get you started:

There are lots of policies and guidelines to get to grips with but they all make your life easier and your stay more fun in the long run. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? ;)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a great time, all the best, au revoir and good luck!

Anti-Vandal Patrol

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page :-) ~ Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 06:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - hope you get a break from the vandals for a while at least. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 07:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for reverting the change to my userpage on February 14, and sorry I only just said so! Well spotted - I only just noticed that you'd done it myself! :) matt.smart ^talk/contribs 13:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help - I've had it done to mine a few times. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 07:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

Thanks for reverting that blanking of my userpage. Much appreciated! Will (aka Wimt) 22:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, but looks like you did the same for me about the same time, so thanks also. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 22:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Special section for messages by special people

You still didn't undo my edit to The Bully (SpongeBob SquarePants). —Flatts 23:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alfa Romeo in motorsport

Yes, the same book. I might revise the precise page numbers given though. Cheers. 4u1e 07:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I see you've already made some of the updates. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 07:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the same book, as already confirmed by 4u1e above. Apologies for the delay in replying. DH85868993 12:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I should be able to use Doug Nye's History of the Grand Prix car to flesh out and ref the 1979 - 1985 works F1 Alfa effort as well. On a (sort of) related note, you don't know of a good online reference for sports car racing (ideally 1960s - 1990s) do you? I'm interested in the context of Mario Andretti and Clay Regazzoni, both of whose articles could use some referencing in that department. Cheers. 4u1e 22:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Andretti and Regazzoni, I've been focusing more on articles on cars rather than drivers, but you might want to take a look at the Car Guides on QV500.com. In the Ferrari Guides they mention Andretti in the Ferrari 312 and 512 pages and Regazzoni is mentioned on some other pages. Try a google advanced search for Regazzoni using site:qv500.com. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 05:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Intifada naming

Hi Xagent, You raised a good point in your last comment, but I'm not sure that I agree to its application here, since it seems to me that an equally popular name not tied to either position exists - "Second Intifada". That its use is of an equal order of magnitude as "al Aqsa Intifada" appears to me to be plain based on the combined results of title searches of Google Scholar (68:62 (58+4)), Google Books (519:558), and the queries of major news providers, which makes further reference to plain Google title searches seem somewhat puzzling. That the position opposing a move to "Second Intifada" has integrated it into its counter proposals ("Al-Aqsa Intifada (Second Intifada)" etc.) suggests that others also appreciate these points to some extent. Regardless, I appreciate your enlightened comment. Cheers, Tewfik^Talk 07:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a mediation case that has been opened on the issue of the title of Al-Aqsa Intifada. Considering that you were involved in the discussion, you may be interested in participating; see here: [1]. Tiamut 17:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tewfik and Tiamut for your comments. I've been away from Wikipedia a while, hence the late reply. Tewfik - your links seem to point to posts on the Al-Aqsa Intifada talk page. If I remember rightly, these posts have already been somewhat discredited on the basis that some or most of those searches, did not restrict to searching the title, so the phase second intifada in page text or footnote would be given equal status as the article/book/page title. You need to use the title search.

For example, google books searches limited to the phrase in article titles:

http://books.google.com/books?q=allintitle%3A+%22al-aqsa+intifada%22&btnG=Search+Books (al-aqsa intifada) current total = 17
http://books.google.com/books?q=allintitle%3A+%22second+intifada%22&btnG=Search+Books (second intifada) current total = 7

--Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 06:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The strength of many horses

I'm told by Typ932 of a discussion you and he had on the Guiletta (old one) talk page about automobile horse power definitions. I've tried to spell out my understanding of the British approach on my talk page (final item). You might be interested to take a look. If you're sufficiently interested to think I might have misconstrued something, I'd be interested to be corrected! Regards Charles01 (talk) 18:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for stopping by and leaving this comment about automotive horsepower. Yes, it's a confusing subject - since you have already started this discussion on your own talk page, I will leave a note there. Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 01:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Veitch

Thank you for adding sources I am not very confident with this and as I have updated would you please do so too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tshiels1 (talk • contribs) 06:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will reply to this on your talk page. Let's continue the conversation there. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 06:23, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For actual article editing

		The Original Barnstar
		At the Olympic Games, there is an influx of editors who edit articles shallowly, without doing the necessary updates to the article text. They categorically leave the real work to others. But this star goes to you for making the first actual update to a biography (namely Misleydis González) that I personally have seen during these Olympics. Punkmorten (talk) 17:32, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar. I appreciate your comments too. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 12:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nikon DSLR Template Vote

There is a discussion/vote you may be interested in taking place at Nikon DSLR template talk Regarding the format of the table and the information it displays. This vote has been prompted by discussion regarding the placement of the Nikon D3, Nikon D1/Nikon D2X and the Nikon D700. If you chose to vote, please familiarize yourself with the discussion and the Nikon system. If you can help out, great. If not, no worries. Thanks in advance. -Fcb981(talk:contribs) 18:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

history of formula one regulations

what does this page need to be A rated? (Gdogg371 (talk) 16:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Green Light (Lorde song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Ireland's peaks do not automatically update at irishcharts.ie. You need to source the site you got the new peak from when a new peak is achieved until the information is shown at the link the singlechart template provides. Ss 112 15:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It already updated thanks, maybe your cache needed refreshing. -- Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 15:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No it hadn't, I checked it at the time. irma.ie had updated with the peaks then, not irishcharts.ie. You did this on a Friday. Irishcharts.ie never updates that quickly. Ss 112 09:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melodrama (Lorde album)

Thanks for your concern, but I have the page watchlisted. Melodrama has stayed on the Australian charts since its release, and it will probably continue to be on there for a while, at least until the ARIA archive at aria.com.au updates. Ss 112 09:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Xagent86. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Xagent86. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]