User talk:XXPowerMexicoXx

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to South Korea has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Piast 93 19:17, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry --XXPowerMexicoXx (talk) 15:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey comrade, my first edit were vandals. Okay, funny edit! 204.195.30.8 (talk) 21:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Historical revisionism (negationism). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 23:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See my talk page for the search results from Google scholar which strongly indicate that communism can be considered totalitarian and oligarchic. This is not about describing communism normatively (i.e., how one thinks it should be), but about describing it positively (i.e. how it is considered to be factually). ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 11:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalist bias on Wikipedia

See these deleted or non-existent articles: Capitalist crimes against humanity, Mass murders by capitalist regimes, etc.

See these clearly anti-communist articles Communist crimes against humanity, Red Terror, etc.

It is obvious that it exists. --SomeDudeWithAUserName (talk with me!) 02:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great site. --SomeDudeWithAUserName (talk with me!) 00:29, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Israel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism: Vatican City is in Category:Theocracies, so are Islamic states. Israel belongs there, too. --XXPowerMexicoXx (talk) 20:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Israel would belong there if it were a theocratic state. But it's not a theocratic state, i.e., "a state ruled by clergy, or by officials who are regarded as divinely guided". — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:21, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikia

Hi, Wikia requires all user text content to be published under a free license so what is the problem?--Darrelljon (talk) 10:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message, I just checked Wikia now and all authors who added content are credited. Creating another wiki is fine but what Wikia do with the content (as long as it conforms to the free license) is up to them. I appreciate an active ad-free community and will consider editing there.--Darrelljon (talk) 22:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CfD of Category:Democratic socialist parties

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Cfd-notify ...}} with {{subst:Cfd-notify ...}}. --Soman (talk) 12:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Communpedia

Are you aware that http://en.communpedia.org , as well as the Spanish and other versions (but not the Russian, fortunately) have been down for about a month? What is your opinion of this development? Are you still interested in the project? ----- Your comrade, Tribal, from en.communpedia -- Communpedia Tribal (talk) 21:37, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]