User talk:X25y en

Orphaned non-free image (Image:PhotoFiltre.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:PhotoFiltre.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HDDlife

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article HDDlife, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. ~Matticus ^T_C 09:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sparrow Commander (file manager)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sparrow Commander (file manager), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. ~Matticus ^T_C 09:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of HDDlife

HDDlife, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that HDDlife satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HDDlife and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of HDDlife during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ~Matticus ^T_C 10:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sparrow Commander (file manager)

Sparrow Commander (file manager), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Sparrow Commander (file manager) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sparrow Commander (file manager) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Sparrow Commander (file manager) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ~Matticus ^T_C 10:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sparrow commander.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sparrow commander.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Andy^reply 10:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please do not remove Templates for deletion notices from templates or remove other people's comments in Templates for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. WODUP 08:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning. If you continue, you'll be blocked. WODUP 08:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HA-HA!--X25y en (talk) 08:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I blocked you for 24 hours. When the block expires, feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 December 23#Template:Offensive pictures, but do not continue to remove the TfD template. WODUP 08:40, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]