User talk:Wwfiyh

hello people. m notsmirks and m chew food.

Speedy deletion nomination of $50,000 Battle Royal Winner (1988)

Hello Wwfiyh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged $50,000 Battle Royal Winner (1988) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of $50,000 Battle Royal Winner (1988)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on $50,000 Battle Royal Winner (1988) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Amortias (T)(C) 22:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Amortias. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Amortias that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 22:40, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User:Wwfiyh. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 22:47, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Ubiquity, potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Meters, Fine I will stop if u stop making deletions on my $50,000 battle royal page. That goes for amortis ok? Sincerly, wwfiyh

Unfortunatley it doesnt work that way. If somethign doesnt meet the notability criteria it can be deleted. Amortias (T)(C) 23:05, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All of your warnings are for swearing at people. That's not going to convince anyone that your article is worth keeping, but it might convince them not to bother helping you. Meters (talk) 23:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Meters, Get out of here. U have no bussness about this. Sincerly, wwfiyh

Dear amortias, What do u mean by "notability criteria"? On my article? Sincerly, wwfiyh P.S. Im sorry for my swearing. Its just my little sister who has been doing this.

Hi Wwfiyh

Articles on Wikipedia aren't owned by anyone, the article may have been created by you but it is considered Wikipedia's article as per this policy. Every article on Wikipedia has to meet various criteria to be included, one of these is the notability criteria which sets out the criteria something needs to meet to be included on Wikipedia. If something doesn't meet these then it is likely to be considered for deletion. Hope that helps. Amortias (T)(C) 01:24, 28 January 2015 (U

Dear amortias, Ok. I get ur point now. So if I created my article. But it needs to be get passed by wikipedias polocy. Right? Sincerly, wwfiyh P.S do u have a google + account?

Speedy deletion nomination of $50,000 battle royal winners

Hello Wwfiyh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged $50,000 battle royal winners for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jhona43 (talk) 16:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User_talk:Jhona43, U better not delete my article because the subject is clearly winning the battle royal. User_talk:Amortias said that my article was good and fine. So shut the fuck up. And get out of here!!! Sincerly, User_talk:wwfiyh

Might want to watch the language or you might end up getting a block for it. If your still working on the article it might be worht requesting its moved to a draft space to allow you tto work on it until its ready to go without being at risk of deletion. Amortias (T)(C) 21:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User_talk: Amortias, Did u read my message yesterday? I am done with my article and u better have a google + account. Sincerly, User_talk: Wwfiyh

Hi Wwfiyh, yes i did read your message. The fact that the article is being nominated for deletion tends to mean that more work is needed before it will be kept. The best way of doing this is to have it moved to a draft space where you can find additional support to confirms its notability. This may take days weeks or possibly longer depending on how easy reliable sources are available. I'm not sure what having a Google+ account is relevent to. Amortias (T)(C) 22:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User_talk:Amortias, Ok. I have done with my article, but also that was the information I have. And also I have a google+ account so I need yours to be freinds. Sincerly, User_talk:Wwfiyh

April 2016

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:Wwfiyh has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amortias (T)(C) 22:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Amortias, aren't u that guy who deleted my other wiki page that was REAL??? And stop deleting my stuff in my talk page plz. Seriously, IDC if it's "constructive". Just leave me alone and don't erase nothing in my page. K? Sincerely, User:Wwfiyh