User talk:Wumbledorf

March 2019

Hello, I'm Acroterion. I noticed that you recently removed content from Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Acroterion (talk) 01:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 02:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop with the "troll admin" business. We have article talkpages for a reason, please use the relevant talkpage to discuss (politely!) your concerns and proposed changes, and see if a consensus develops. That's how we make changes on Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 02:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wumbledorf, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wumbledorf! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 23:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]