User talk:Writerbuster

Welcome from Rasnaboy

Welcome, Writerbuster!

Hello, Writerbuster, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Rasnaboy, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Introduction

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

How to write a great article

Simplified Manual of Style

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, users like you are what makes Wikipedia such a great encyclopedia!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Rasnaboy (talk) 11:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Rasheed (writer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Abdul Rasheed (writer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 16:25, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sithara S. (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sithara S. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sithara S., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Writerbuster! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Rasheed (writer) (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AaqibAnjum were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Update the minimal inline citations and submit it again --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Rasheed (writer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abdul Rasheed (writer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 20:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sithara S.

Hello, Writerbuster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sithara S.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Abdul Rasheed (writer)

Hello, Writerbuster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abdul Rasheed (writer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Writerbuster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When I tried to edit an article a message said I am not allowed to do so because IP address 117.217.48.0/20 has been blocked due to "vandalism". I do not know what is the issue with this IP address. I don't think any vandalism has taken place from my PC. Kindly investigate and let me know. If no problem, then unblock.

Accept reason:

Unfortunately, waiting for the blocking administrator, Cyphoidbomb, to respond to SQL's question below is not likely to be useful, because Cyphoidbomb abruptly stopped editing in April. I have therefore gone ahead without Cyphoidbomb. I can't see any reason why the block shouldn't be anon-only, and since Cyphoidbomb isn't a Checkuser it seems unlikely that he knows of a relevant reason invisible to me, so I have made the block anon-only. JBW (talk) 16:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not necessarily that vandalism came from your PC - but more likely from someone else using the same internet service provider as you. @Cyphoidbomb: would you be OK with me reducing the block on 117.217.48.0/20 to Anon only? ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 03:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JBW. Honestly, I meant to get this one after giving it ~24h. Forgot all about it. Good catch. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 20:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Antony Theodore moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Antony Theodore, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources, third-party sources not affiliated with the. public. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 00:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orient Paperbacks moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Orient Paperbacks, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 15:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orient Paperbacks (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orient Paperbacks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Orient Paperbacks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orient Paperbacks (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still promotional. Sources are also more for Vision Books and not for Orient.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orient Paperbacks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Orient Paperbacks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orient Paperbacks (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still promotional. Sources are more for vision.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orient Paperbacks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Orient Paperbacks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:55, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Orient Paperbacks has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Orient Paperbacks. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orient Paperbacks (June 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Hatchens was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Hatchens (talk) 08:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Orient Paperbacks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Orient Paperbacks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hatchens (talk) 08:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Writerbuster. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

People who write about companies more often than not have a COI, which is why I put guidance as to what to do if you have a COI. I have not accused you of having a COI, and I'm happy to accept your assurance that you do not.

That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

Most of your refs were not acceptable sources despite what you claim, they include the group's own websites and interviews with CEOs of the companies, what we need is independent third-party sources, not the company or its management talking about themselves.

The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

The fact that some of its authors are notable doesn't automatically make the company notable, that has to be established separately, and as you can see from the criteria requires independent sources.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Opinions presented as facts include leading publishing house of India... it has launched the literary careers of several new authors who went on to achieve international acclaim... This book deal was a major turnaround for the company... It has also launched the careers of several new authors like Anita Desai who went on to achieve international acclaim.. You also give us unverified claims like distribution network with more than 1000 trade outlets... more than 2000 published titles on its shelves. The current turnover of the company is around USD 4 million. , and referring to Kapil Malhotra just by his first name is at the least unencyclopaedic.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot generalise that people writing about companies "generally" have a conflict of interest. That shows your bias and prejudgment, isn't it? If you don't like the tone/tenor of my article, you are free to edit it, or point the same out so that someone else or I myself can edit it. But can you simply delete it outright? My full day's work is lost. You don't feel bad about it? There is hardly any student or scholar in India who has not read a book published by Orient Paperbacks. And you think it does not deserve a Wikipedia entry? May I know why?? Writerbuster (talk) 14:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Sahitya Akademi Award. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 11:50, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2007 in poetry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean O'Brien. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sithara S.

Hello, Writerbuster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sithara S.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Antony Theodore

Hello, Writerbuster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antony Theodore, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Antony Theodore

Hello, Writerbuster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Antony Theodore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parichay Das, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maithili.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My edit was meant for Maithili language. Writerbuster (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well done!

I really appreciate you for catching Barun Roy and proposing it for deletion though better was to AfD it. This has remained as it is from last 15 years. You may use Twinkle as an easy tool for tagging articles with various maintenance templates. However, remember WP:BEFORE is necessary before you proceed with any deletion-related tag. Thanks! ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 18:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have the expertise of experienced wiki editors. I do not know advanced tools. So I can only flag articles for other other experienced people to take a final decision. Tagging AfD will be too drastic. I have noticed many such spurious articles. Should I mark them all with AfD tag, or leave the task for more experienced guys? Thanks. Writerbuster (talk) 07:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article icon

Hello! I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions has been undone because it added the Good Article template to Tapan Kumar Pradhan, an article that has not been promoted by the Good Article Nomination process. If you believe that this article meets the Good Article Criteria, then you are encouraged to nominate it for review by following the Good Article nominating instructions. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Good Article Nominations talk page. Thank you. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paromita Das for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paromita Das is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paromita Das until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

NeverTry4Me - TT Page 09:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bhasha Samsad moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bhasha Samsad, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 08:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bhasha Samsad

Hello, Writerbuster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhasha Samsad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bhasha Samsad

Hello, Writerbuster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhasha Samsad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]