User talk:WriterListener

MyExamCloud

MyExamCloud deletion nomination. MyExamCloud is not an blog or website. It is an web application. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ponduraisingh (talk • contribs) 12:50, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

that was quick

...on RK Laxman. :) prashanthns (talk) 06:45, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laura Reiley

Hello, WriterListener. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Laura Reiley, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —swpb^T 13:30, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Raees Dynasty of Chitral - I see you tagged it for various problems

Straight copyvio, I've deleted it. Doug Weller talk 14:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Abbottonian. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Kalakeyavadham, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Abbottonian (talk) 17:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the page

Thanks for reviewing the page I created, Aruna Sundararajan IAS. I have added some categories. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajithpithu (talk • contribs) 10:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Reviewing Founding Farmers

First of all thank you for reviewing my page so quickly. I really appreciate it. I am new to creating new pages so what do you mean by "add categories" to the page? I appreciate your help here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thejavis86 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, WriterListener. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question on Pankaj Ghemawat page tag

Hello, you placed an original research flag on the Pankaj Ghemawat page. I really wasn't sure what you were referring to, though I did delete a few sentences that seemed overly promotional. Could you let me know what you interpreted as original research? Erinbh (talk) 13:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)erinbh[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valor Econômico

The article Valor Econômico has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources cited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Natadmim (talk) 19:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]