User talk:WrestlerHelper3

Welcome!

Hello, WrestlerHelper3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 03:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raw (WWE brand), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memphis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Roman Reigns, but you didn't provide a reliable source. Can you please include a citation when you add content to Wikipedia. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 08:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please click the blue links above! Nothing was wrong with your addition to the article. I just wanted to teach you that when you add content you need add a citation as well. StaticVapor message me! 08:25, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WWE, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustafa Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removing repeated links in tables

RE:your edits at List of current champions in WWE. As per MOS:REPEATLINK, "if helpful for readers, a link may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, hatnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead." Furthermore, a table is an embedded list, meaning duplicate links are permissible. --JDC808 ♫ 06:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DONOTFIXIT and WP:NOPIPE

Please familiarize yourself with the above policies. Edits such as [1] and [2] are not helpful, and go against policies. Especially the second edit, where you forced the incorrect name to show. See the official championship page [3], and see "The" is not in their name. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 12:40, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pointed to this policy, yet you continue editing against it [4] [5]. Why? - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 12:40, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, this is not a hard concept. Stop forcing links to be piped. Read the above guidelines and follow them. Simple and easy. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 14:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yet here we are and you still are not following the guidelines and still have not responded. You are required to WP:ENGAGE which you are failing to do. Should this continue I will be forced to open a case at WP:ANI against you. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 13:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chad Gable, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 19:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yolo Tag

So the official WWE twitter has stated EXCLUSIVE: Say hello to your NEW Yolo County #TagTeamChampions... #HeavyMachinery! @otiswwe @tuckerwwe which means that WWE officially recognizes the championship change. Please do not remove properly sourced material unless you have a better source supporting its removal. Removing sourced data without cause could be considered vandalism, please be aware. MPJ-DK (talk) 02:45, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I provided you proof from WWE's official twitter account that they acknowledge it, considering you were already provided proof and you still reverted it can no longer be considered "good faith", please try not to edit war and remain civil. MPJ-DK (talk) 05:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully: it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions to curtail disruption in articles related to professional wrestling. Before continuing to make edits that involve professional wrestling, please read the full description of these sanctions here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

August 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mike Kanellis, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 19:06, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Your recent contributions at Template:WWE personnel appear to show that you are engaged in edit warring; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not override another editor's contributions. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. StaticVapor message me! 15:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dolph Ziggler, you may be blocked from editing. StaticVapor message me! 15:22, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. oknazevad (talk) 16:47, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 18:07, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Template:WWE personnel

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WWE personnel

Template:WWE personnel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Clearly you need to step away from this template. You returned to making controversial edits immediately after your block and thus put yourself closer to being blocked again. Trust me, don't risk it. Cool off and make your edits elsewhere. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WresterlHelper3, you may be able to avoid a longer block if you will STOP NOW. EdJohnston (talk) 02:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read WP:BRD. If you get reverted discuss it, don't just edit war. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 15:00, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? The admin who blocked you warned you EdJohnston to knock it off, and I pointed you to the approach to take, yet you just redid the same edit once again without discussion [6]. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 15:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:WrestlerHelper3, I've blocked you again, this time for a week. You are expected to work for agreement with others when changes are disputed. See WP:GAB for how to request an unblock. EdJohnston (talk) 16:06, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop. Discuss it on the talk page or step away. You clearly don't feel like listening to anyone, so this is the final warning I'm giving you. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:18, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WrestlerHelper3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been unfairly blocked for adding Luke Harper and Erick Rowan back to the WWE personnel template. Why? Because another troll on this site keeps removing it even though they are now an official tag team again and their link should be placed back on the template.

Decline reason:

This does not permit you to violate WP:EW. Being correct is not sufficient. Yamla (talk) 19:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hell in a Cell (2019), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Singles match (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:WWE personnel, you may be blocked from editing. StaticVapor message me! 09:22, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I agree with your change. However, your edit summary and return to edit warring is inexcusable and you're very lucky you were not blocked for longer. I tagged you on the talk page discussion I attempted to start, but you revert instead. StaticVapor message me! 09:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it. EdJohnston blocked you twice already. Yet as soon as you are unblocked you just go back and redo the exact same edit, while ignoring the conversation on the talk page. Do you want a permanent ban? You might want to read up on WP:ENGAGE. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 16:12, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Bray Wyatt. StaticVapor message me! 20:54, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of current champions in WWE, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tape delay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New 24/7 champ

R Truth got his title back. It was posted on instagram and twitter. So hopefully you change this soon Jaylar1978 (talk) 04:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Addressing other users

Please address other users in a civil way and avoid using explicit language. Maintaining pages on Wikipedia is a collaborative effort and if another user has made a mistake (such as the edit in TLC: Tables, Ladders and Chairs (2019)), then simply correct it. There is no need to insult other users.

Regards Zerobrains94 (talk) 12:05, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I noticed that you made a comment on the page TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs (2019) with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 18:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Optakeover: Isn't it ironic that his comment includes instructing the person to learn how to use the site, yet WrestlerHelper3 has a talk page filled with messages from people because they are not using the site correctly. And blocked 3 times recently for it. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 13:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Universal Championship

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WWE Universal Championship; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

You were asked to take it to the talk page if you had any further issues. Instead, you just again reverted and did not say anything. That is not how you resolve an issue. If you continue with these actions, you may be permanently blocked, based on your past history. --JDC808 ♫ 02:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. oknazevad (talk) 16:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Amakuru (talk) 17:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WrestlerHelper3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't edit anything with that last change. I was merely replying to the last person's edit reason. If I do not get unblocked, then this whole fucking site is biased.

Decline reason:

Vulgar requests are not considered. 331dot (talk) 07:28, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WrestlerHelper3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not know how to directly reply to someone on this site, so I used the undo function to do so, but I removed the warring change of Strowman's name on the template, so I feel that I should logically be unblocked.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:27, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:25, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]