User talk:Wpgoh

well done can some one help me to change the tile to upper case Singapoer Life Church instead of Singapore life church

Done. Mak (talk) 02:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography

I regret to have to remind you that autobiographical articles about people who are, at present, not notable do not have a place in our encyclopedia.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Anthony.bradbury 19:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Goh Wee Pheng may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. —Caesura ^(t) 20:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Integration of church and culture in China

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that Integration of church and culture in China meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integration of church and culture in China. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. SkerHawx 19:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

how can i join Wikipedia to be an editor or administrator

Sorry, I think there is a slight misunderstanding. My page talks about what I do in relation to Wikipedia, so my experience in interest in music is explained because I edit a lot of music articles. Most importantly, though, it is in what we call "user space", meaning that it is prefixed by User:, so in my case User:Makemi. You wrote your article in "article space", which is meant to be only for encyclopedic content. Someone has moved the article to your "user page", where it can stay.

Congratulations! You have already joined Wikipedia, just by editing, you are now a Wikipedian and an editor. Usually to be an administrator you have to be around the community for a while, show a willingness to do certain chores, and go through Requests for adminship. I'll give you the standard welcome template that has some good links for editing and basic rules of the Wikipedia community. Thanks.

Welcome!

Hello, Wpgoh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mak (talk) 21:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Singapore life church. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TheRanger 01:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Singapore Life Church

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Singapore Life Church, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Whpq (talk) 18:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]