User talk:WormTT/Adopt/Cyberpower678

The fifth article.

I would disagree that the fifth one should be tagged as A1. I would consider such a text patent nonsense especially since I see "it was worth the laugh." But then again, it's a difficult concept for me and if I ever were to be an admin, big if, I would definitely stay away from CSD deletions.—cyberpower _{Limited Access}^{Trick or Treat} 15:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may be right, and it might be arguable that it's a hoax or a test article, but it's certainly no patent nonsense. Patent nonsense by CSD terms means incomprehensible. This excludes poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, implausible theories, vandalism and hoaxes, fictional material, coherent non-English material, and poorly translated material (from WP:CSD)

So, I could see the argument for G3 (Vandalism or Hoax) - or even A7 (No indication of notability), but simply put, I think the most accurate is A1 - There's no context, we don't know who he is or what he did, there's not even a surname. Worm^TT(talk) 15:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]