User talk:WoofersSCW

WoofersSCW, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi WoofersSCW! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Battle of Baghuz Fawqani

Hello, I'm El C. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. El_C 21:16, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Rojava offensive

Hi, can you undo this [1] edit please? The reason I've said killed was because it was specifically claimed in a source [2] that the number was for the killed, rather than the usual neutralized. The source is already included in the article. KasimMejia (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Responding to your message. Not used to Wikipedia. This is a misunderstanding of what the Turkish MOD means. The MOD uses the phrase "Neutralized" in all of it's operations, which means killed, captured, and wounded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WoofersSCW (talk • contribs) 16:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, if you're new let me start by saying you can respond to the message here. And regarding the Neutralized and Killed announcements, I know that neutralized doesn't mean killed, however in the particular source at the article, the Turkish MoD actually claims that number was killed rather than neutralized.. KasimMejia (talk) 16:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I thought this as well and was going to revert but then I read in the article "'Nine more PKK/PYD-YPG terrorists neutralized in air operation within the scope of Operation Peace Spring. A total of 228 terrorists neutralized so far since Turkey started Operation Peace Spring in northern Syria," the ministry said on Twitter.'" Which is why I will not be reverting my change. TRT is misunderstanding what "neutralized" means.

Alright sure, welcome to Wikipedia!KasimMejia (talk) 16:43, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Verifiability

Please take a look at WP:TWITTER. N°2 No use for claims regarding a third party. Hope you understand. This are guidelines. Other drones entries in the List have non Twitter - RS too.Mr.User200 (talk) 16:50, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About Ababil-3

I answered you about Ababil-3 and Yasir all of them are syrian. Syria operates those drones since 2013. And these drones were naturally was given by Iran (for free perhaps). But the are syrian drones, iranian made but syrian drones; — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarimauFury (talk • contribs) 21:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NO ! Hezbollah were not dominating in Qalamoun ! At all ! There were also and little bit much forces of Syrian Army https://www.syrianperspective.com/2014/04/map-of-qalamoun-offensive-updated.html

This is incorrect. Qalamoun was and remains today a strongpoint for Hezbollah. Indeed, even your source points this out.

Please look at the map, and don't tell me there is only hezbollah there.

Let's this discussion appart, we can include hezbollah forces inside syrian forces, since we can't distinguish between both of them. Now I need help all our changes are threatened by Mr.User200 and Илија Гуск which tries to revert back the whole page to one week before and supress all changes and shotdowns ! I tried to restore the page, but MrUser200 reported me to administrators for 3RR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarimauFury (talk • contribs) 22:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism in List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Syrian Civil War

@WoofersSCW: the page has been vandalised to an old version where even the totals are not mathematically correct, please help me to undo revision from Илија Гуск and his IP adress 93.87.136.4

Turkish Drones.

Your edits made on the Turkish Bayraktar Drones are Ok. But your revert at saying "routinely reports downing large numbers of drones" is Wikipedia:No original research. According to whom, 6 are large numbers?? The source itself does not says that, only 6 reported lost, also the source does not says that " lack of visual confirmation for many of these shoot downs means that verification is often difficult." Finally the source added states that Turkish drones were lost not specifically Bayraktar TB2, those lost drones could be Bayraktar Tactical UAS or Bayraktar Mini UAV. Im leaving it just like you left it, but with that correction.Mr.User200 (talk) 00:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... in a war where aircraft are limited half a dozen combat drones shot down in a week is a large number proportionally.

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 21:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]