User talk:Woodyallenfan2004

TVD

Thanks! I was monitoring your edits, me likes! Melia Nymph (talk) 01:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- FYI, they're now trying to let everyone know your vote doesn't count, because you don't have many edits. They're really working against us, this is kind of unfair. Amelia Nymph (talk) 04:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why I wrote a pointless, non-sense article for their speedy-deletion needs. Woodyallenfan2004 (talk) 07:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Specknock

A tag has been placed on Specknock, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 07:01, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create joke articles; if you'd like to play around (as long as your contributing the the encyclopedia elsewhere) you can create a joke page in your user space, but not out with the articles. Thanks for understanding. Shell ^babelfish 09:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Violin Diary

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Violin Diary, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikibin.org/articles/the-violin-diary.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You should be OK to leave it as is since the bot tagged it as being content from a GNU-compliant website, same as this one. That's why I removed the bot notice. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Ah, good to know. Thanks. Woodyallenfan2004 (talk) 05:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Violin Diary

A tag has been placed on The Violin Diary, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 10:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, after reviewing I've deleted the article. While it had more links than the original one, many of them just to online bookstores and the review at bookpleasures doesn't seem to be a reliable source either to address the consensus of the previous debate. The best way to move forward, is to forget for a moment about the previous content, and just look for good sources, and if you can find them, rather write a userspace draft to bring to WP:DRV. Maybe time will help too.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you guys feel this way. Wikipedia has become impossible to participate in. Woodyallenfan2004 (talk) 01:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]