User talk:Wmcduff
Welcome!
Hello, Wmcduff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 00:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
WP:NEE
[edit]Haha, yes, I'm afraid I don't live up there any more (unfortunately). But I've assessed them now anyway. Thanks! Bob talk 17:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
RE: Ashington A.F.C.
[edit]Hi, sorry I haven't replied yet. I think it's fine. You can justify the fact that it's the biggest section by simply pointing out that more information about it is available. Everything in that section is warranted. Thanks. —Half Price 21:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Swing
[edit]It's easy, it's the average of Party A's gains and Party B's losses. (A+B)/2. -- Earl Andrew - talk 12:31, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- That was an error. Should be good now. -- Earl Andrew - talk 21:53, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- The same, (A+B)/2 (12.27+2.39)/2=7.33. It's compared to the Tories, as they finished 2nd in 2011. -- Earl Andrew - talk 02:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Riding maps
[edit]I just used MS Paint, and painstakingly went by poll by poll over another map. Of course, there are other ways of doing it. Do you have a poll map of the riding and results for each poll? -- Earl Andrew - talk 12:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, they are quite time consuming. That's why I don't even try to attempt the Ontario provincial maps, as there are more polling divisions than federally (even though the ridings share boundaries). -- Earl Andrew - talk 21:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- Very nice. -- Earl Andrew - talk 00:51, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Congratulations
[edit]You're now Extended Confirmed! Thanks for sticking around so long!
--MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 18:29, 4 November 2019 (UTC)