User talk:Wlod

Welcome!

Hello, Wlod, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Convex Function

I put back "in" instead of ε at convex function. The general Wikipedia style is to avoid symbolic notation unless necessary, and use words if that suffices. Hope that's fine with you. You can reply here if you have comments. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Metric space aimed at its subspace

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Metric space aimed at its subspace, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Captain panda 02:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I said in the tag on the article, Wikipedia is not the place for random listings of numbers. If there is going to be an article, explain the numbers rather than simply listing them. Make an article about the numbers, equations, etc if you think that it should be kept. In its current format, the article should not be on Wikipedia. Captain panda 23:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the reason that I did not respond sooner is that I was not on my computer at the time. Sorry, that you had to wait for a response. Captain panda 23:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I do not see how I am interfering. I simply nominated it for proposed deletion. Whether the article is deleted or not is not decided by me at this point as I am not an administator. The purpose of Wikipedia is not to guide someone throughout all the intricacies of mathematics as policy found here indicates. I hope this explains why I think that it should be deleted. Captain panda 02:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your comments

I replied on my talk page on the two topics you started there. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki on personal page

Hi, Wlod, nice to meet hou here.

I see you inform readers of your nickname here and pl-wiki — so I think you might want to add interlanguage links on both your peronal pages: [[en:User:Wlod]] on pl-wiki, and [[pl:User:Wlod]] here. --CiaPan 13:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your remarks

I am not aware of your training as a mathematician, but the kind of needless insulting remarks you made about the administrator Arthur Rubin and myself are quite uncalled for. What you wrote on the talk page of prime number seems to be your own point of view and seems to have little to do with standard usage in the mathematical profession. Why not contribute to the wikipedia with some real contributions to mathematics articles rather than pedantic quibbles? Mathsci 21:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to avoid (a) self-promotion on the WP; (b) making personal allegations of harrassment in WP edit summaries. You should be aware that most practising mathematicians avoid discussing or advertising their own personal research or writings in WP articles. Often their friends, colleagues or other researchers in the area will add these details, if they merit inclusion in an encyclopedia. You should therefore not be surprised to receive criticism if you have created articles about your own research. There are issues of WP:COI, WP:OR and WP:OWN involved here. --Mathsci 11:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop treating the Talk:Prime number page as a forum and writing your comments wherever you see fit. Please post your comments on a mathematics forum if you have nothing to discuss relevant to edits of the main article.

Mathsci (talk) 21:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Ed Trice

Your comment on Talk:Ed Trice was inappropriate, upset Ed Trice's feelings, and contributed nothing to the Wikipedia. Please keep in mind people have feelings when posting on talk pages. Thank you. Just to clarify (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair division

You are right that differing values means the people can possible get more of what they want, but it doesn't make the problem of fair division easier. Fair division is hard because their values differ. Perhaps another go at it? Dmcq (talk) 12:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dingo and square-kilometres in diameter

W związku z Twoim wpisem w dyskusji artykułu o dingo Talk:Dingo#square-kilometres in diameter podpowiadam: dokument [1] podwiązany jako Reference 14 w artykule Dingo podaje na stronie 81 (to jest 82. strona w numeracji pliku PDF, bo pierwsza jest nienumerowana strona tytułowa):

Results show urban dingoes to have comparably small home range sizes (mean 2.17km² TAP or 4.14km² MCP) and exhibit crepuscular activity patterns and flexible habitat use. (....) However, at all times, all urban dingoes were within 700m of residential homes, were often within 200m of homes, and were regularly in extremely close proximity to homes. One 27kg urban dingo even had a core area in a small patch of bushland at the bottom of popular primary school in the heart of a large town. (....)

Nie wiem co to jest TAP i MCP, wg niektórych znalezisk to drugie mogłoby być 'minimal convex polygon'. W takim razie pierwsze byłoby powierzchnią rzeczywistego terytorium, drugie - jego otoczki wypukłej. --CiaPan (talk) 10:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Monday (date)

The original publicity stunt was an advert. The article is an article about an advert. It's had media coverage, it's notable, so we write about it. Wikipedia isn't saying that people should believe it's true, and we're certainly not saying people should buy their holidays from this or that place. If you think the article can be made clearer, then help, but please don't disrupt. Also, you might be able to make pl:Blue_Monday clearer; Google translate implies that it's still reporting the thing as being fact. Pseudomonas_(talk) 10:28, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, look at Category:Advertising_campaigns for such articles as Atheist Bus Campaign, a notable campaign that is described without Wikipedia taking any view on the existence or otherwise of a God :) Pseudomonas_(talk) 13:34, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Piotr Czerniawski

Edits like this are completely inappropriate and violate Wikipedia's policy on living people. Please read over WP:NPOV, as well as Wikipedia:Verifiability. If you have qualms with the article, the best place to take it would be AFD. If you continue to attack the subject of the article, you will be blocked. Tiptoety ^talk 22:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of Polish people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Violinist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Famous last words :)

Re: [2]... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan Jaworowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed in this edit --CiaPan (talk) 16:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Jaworowski

Can you add any references for the article (Jan Jaworowski)? Bibliographical references of some books written by him (or references to works based on his achievments), that will prove his works were important (Wikipedia:Notability (people), Wikipedia:Notability (academics))?

You know Wikipedia in general accepts only information which is verifiable (Wikipedia:Verifiability), that is supported by some referenced, publicly available, reliable sources (Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources). One's personal knowledge is not suficient here (Wikipedia:No original research). Please make some effort to fit Wikipedia's rules. I appreciate your input, but if it doesn't meet standards it may get deleted. --CiaPan (talk) 06:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ja Cię nie straszę, tylko doradzam. Nie mam ani możliwości, ani nawet chęci usuwania czegokolwiek (z wyjątkiem, z rzadka, oczywistych bzdur). Niemniej znam realia wikipedyjne (i Ty również je znasz!): hasła nie spełniające minimum wymogów formalnych są usuwane, lub cofane do brudnopisów. I choćbyś miał nie wiem ile racji, jeśli hasłu brak publicznych źródeł – wyleci. Dlatego warto się postarać.

A może poprosić o pomoc? Zobacz np. jak David Eppstein rozwinął Twoje hasło o Wiesławie Nizioł: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wies%C5%82awa_Nizio%C5%82&action=history – może miałby źródła i chęć, by poszerzyć też biogram J.Jaworowskiego? --CiaPan (talk) 10:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you see what happened? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=679900738
“rzeczy pozostawione samym sobie zmieniają się – niemal zawsze – na gorsze” --CiaPan (talk) 17:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ależ, co też Pan, nie ma za co, Panie szanowny! W ogóle nie ma o czym mówić! --CiaPan (talk) 14:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Čech homology

To tematy Tobie bliskie, więc zapewne będziesz wiedział: czy wyrażenie 'Čech homology' w pierwszym akapicie Shape theory (mathematics) powinno wiązać do hasła Čech cohomology? --CiaPan (talk) 08:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wlod. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Borsuk's conjecture and Perkal's work

Hi. Wlod,

is this edit in 'Borsuk's conjecture' from 3 January 2013 yours?

If so, could you, please, verify once again the journal/year/volume?

I intended to add an URL to an online version of the Perkal's paper, but couldn't find any. I did not even manage to find the title in Colloquium Mathematicum archives at IMPAN pages (https://www.impan.pl/..../colloquium-mathematicum/all).

Wszystkiego najlepszego. --CiaPan (talk) 10:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.
Answer here, if you wish – I'm watching your talk page. :)
You can also add {{re|CiaPan}} to your answer, if you want to notify me asap. CiaPan (talk)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wlod. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Komandosi

Please verify my recent additions to the article: Special:Diff/864444594 and Special:Diff/864452916. --CiaPan (talk) 15:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wlod. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Notice re: Trump-Ukraine scandal

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please note that I also reverted your edit to the lead in the article, as it went against the current consensus to clearly refer to the issue as a scandal. OhKayeSierra (talk) 08:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to add that the aforementioned discussion can be found at Talk:Trump–Ukraine scandal/Archive 3#Requested move 17 October 2019. OhKayeSierra (talk) 08:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Izabela Wagner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Izabela Wagner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izabela Wagner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The result was: keep. Best regards, CiaPan (talk) 12:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]