User talk:Witchcrafty

This is Witchcrafty's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crusader Talent (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

sources are very poor quality, see WP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crusader Talent and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Witchcrafty! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thank you so much! I'll be honest I tried to save it as a draft and think I mistakenly went to post it before I was ready to, will definitely ask for feedback at Teahouse when I think I've added sufficient sources and a more thorough history of what I know on the subject! I sincerely appreciate the offer to help. Many thanks for the review Witchcrafty (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Crusader Talent has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Crusader Talent. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Witchcrafty. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Drmes thank you so much for the suggestions! I will do whatever is necessary, out of curiosity with edits as I know I was mentioned in a thread prior, is it better to be bolder with edits and sources opposed to small ones and to let them revert if it is deemed unnecessary? Been offline on here for a fair share of time and I have a few subjects I'd like to contribute to but am anxious of upsetting people.

Thank you for your hard work! I surely appreciate it from all the articles I used to reference for my history lessons! Witchcrafty (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually trying to work hard to get you to address the matter at hand. What's better? To answer the question about the COI, which seems pretty obvious. Drmies (talk) 00:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I understand. I mainly have been just filling this out in my own time and have been unaware of the nature of it all, I'm not used to the site at all and wish I hadn't accidentally gone to publish it. I do have a COI as I am involved heavily in the Old School Runescape community, hence why I know a lot about it. I will add to my user profile and also add the tabs recommended when I have a moment to. Moving on from here, I will use talk pages to make necessary edits to it and remove anything that is deemed unnecessary. I genuinely just want to participate again and mean no ill intent, I'm sorry and I apologize for my draft being not up to standard I have a lot to learn. Witchcrafty (talk) 00:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crusader Talent (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need independent reliable sources not recycled PR and mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crusader Talent and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 09:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Crusader Talent

Hello, Witchcrafty. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crusader Talent, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]