User talk:Wisconsingary

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Wisconsingary, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 02:15, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:MiltGantenbein.jpg

Hello, Wisconsingary!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:MiltGantenbein.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MiltGantenbein.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MiltGantenbein.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:EdKotalScout.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:EdKotalScout.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BobKroll1972.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BobKroll1972.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Multichill (talk) 13:59, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Using your own words

If you are adding text to an article, please make sure to use your own words as much as possible. Do not copy material directly from other websites. Thanks. Zagalejo^^^ 19:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're missing the point. If you use your own words, you can add as much as you want. But I noticed that several phrases were copied directly from other websites. We can't allow that, for legal reasons. And I'm not going to sift through everything you write. If I find one sentence that is copied from another website, I'm going to assume others are, too. Zagalejo^^^ 04:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Your addition to Ted Fritsch has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 23:04, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Paul Duhart into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Please attribute the text you copied into Ted Fritsch. —Bagumba (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tobin Rote

Your unwillingness to use edit summaries or talk pages to discuss your edits indicates your disregard for the Wikipedia community overall. Your failure to conform to the Rice University article's layout and your reversions in that article are simply disruptive. If your approach to editing Wikipedia doesn't change, your account will eventually be disabled. Rklawton (talk) 12:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Your recent editing history at Rice University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Spencer^T♦C 19:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. When you recently edited Don Chandler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Willie Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Austin Straubel

Hi-I deleted the material because there was no citations in the article. I mentioned that in the edit. You need to put citations in the article. That is the reason. Thank you-RFD (talk) 21:57, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Austin Straubel citations

I was a little surprise when you called me about the Austin Straubel article. In a way it was nice to hear a voice of a fellow Wikipedian from Wisconsin. Okay-there are still problems with the Austin Straubel article. You did not added any citations. One of the editors warned you about copyright issues and that is also a concern in the article. The citations and editing in the Austin Straubel article are still needed. Thanks-RFD (talk) 15:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Please add citations when you are adding new information to articles; otherwise, the edits could be deleted due to lack of citations. Thank you-RFD (talk) 12:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Paul Brown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AAFC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buck Buchanan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Willie Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Brown

I have reverted your recent edit to the lead of Paul Brown. I have no doubt this edit was well-intentioned and agree that more of the negative aspects of Paul Brown's career ought to be included in the article. Having said that, Wikipedia must maintain a neutral point of view, and this edit slanted the lead almost entirely against the subject while removing most of his accomplishments and innovations. There is already some balance in the lead; the final paragraph says he was not universally liked and often had run-ins with players and with Art Modell. Perhaps we can discuss how to make a more constructive effort to balance the article further. Thanks much. --Batard0 (talk) 04:47, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cutting and pasting from other sources

Do not cut-and-paste material from other sources, as you did in Martin Garrick. The arrest incident can be included in the article, but should be rewritten (and shortened). OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Carl DeMaio, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Athene cunicularia (talk) 21:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

13:18, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Paul Brown was NOT worshipped by Vince Lombardi....Col Blake, General patton etc, were more influence,, General patton does not put on his page who worshipped Him neighter Does Jesus Christ .. There were many People involved with the hiring practices of Vince Lombardi .. as a matter of fact, Paul Brown told the Packers they would never get him to Green Bay , from the mara's and Paul Brown did not GIVE Players to Green Bay....THEY traded some castoffs for Billy Howton,who was recognized as the best receiver at the time in the NFL. Please do not write things that Paul brown is the reason of success or Mentor of Vince Lombardi., Yourtrying to paint a picture that this guy is the reason of success of others. when this is NOt true ...also Plase do not Lie with the NFL staistics,, as the NFL doesnt recognize the Stats of there early weakling League that couldnt survive. AAFC 1946-1949... Also corrected mistake of paul Brown Was coached for the 1964 NFl Champions Clevland Browns ..

13:19, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Paul Brown was NOT worshipped by Vince Lombardi.... There were many People involved with the hiring practices of Vince Lombardi .. as a matter of fact, Paul Brown told the Packers they would never get him to Green Bay , from the mara's and Paul Brown did not GIVE Players to Green Bay....THEY traded some castoffs for Billy Howton,who was recognized as the best receiver at the time in the NFL. Please do not write things that Paul brown is the reason of success or Mentor of Vince Lombardi., Yourtrying to paint a picture that this guy is the reason of success of others. when this is NOt true ...also Plase do not Lie with the NFL staistics,, as the NFL doesnt recognize the Stats of there early weakling League that couldnt survive. AAFC 1946-1949...

Paul Brown

I reverted a couple of your recent edits at Paul Brown. We shouldn't be removing information sourced to reliable sources without having a discussion of it. The cited source says:

"Most people don't know that Vince Lombardi worshipped Paul Brown. It was Brown who helped Lombardi become the head coach in Green Bay by recommending him to the Packers' owners. Brown often sent players to Lombardi, Players who couldn't help Cleveland, but players Brown believed were NFL caliber."

...and so forth. It appears from these edits that you want to downplay Paul Brown's achievements and significance, and I think other editors will agree completely on that if the proper sourcing is there to back it up. I would humbly suggest that it's not constructive, however, to simply remove sourced material and change the way career statistics are presented to make this point, if that is in fact what you are attempting here. In all instances, it's always best to have a conversation about these things before making any significant alterations. Thanks. --Batard0 (talk) 10:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vince Lombardi NEVER worshipped Paul Brown ,,this user is trying to credit the success of Lombardi to be attributed to Paul Brown. Mr Brown was a back stabber, for his own Credit ,,, He Downplayed Bill Walsh of the 49ers,and prevented him from getting other positions … TYPICAL egotist, is paul Brown,

Paul Brown

I've reinstated some of the material you had repeatedly removed – the same material discussed in my note above. It's fine to take out anything that's not properly sourced under Wikipedia's guidelines or something where there's disputed sourcing, but it's always best to discuss it first so we can reach a consensus on where the best, most reliable sourcing lies. I've provided quotations from reliable sources above supporting the material you removed. If you'd like to take it out again, I'd be grateful if we (and other members of the community, if they so wish) could have a discussion about it first. Giving us some reliable sources that counter the above-quoted sources would make the case for removal much stronger. --Batard0 (talk) 18:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Brown was not the Mentor for Vince Lombardi .... LEts not even go there,,, HE told Domnic Oleniczak,, that the Packers would never get him.. Credit goes to Domnick Olejniczak,, Jack Vainisi , and the Executive Committe of the Packers

Dominic Olejniczak, president of the Packers, said, "Lombardi has the background to be a good administrator. We know that from a couple of long interviews with him. He was our man without a question of a doubt."

Just a Discussion Perhaps Vainisi's greatest contribution to the Green Bay franchise was Lombardi himself.

It was Vainisi who - on his own authority - first contacted Lombardi to see if he was interested in the Green Bay job after the disastrous 1-10-1 season of 1958 under Ray "Scooter" McLean. Lombardi told Vainisi in a phone conversation that he was, which delighted Vainisi, who had grown frustrated watching talented players fail to reach their potential in Green Bay.

Vainisi then lobbied members of the Packer executive board to not only hire Lombardi, but also give Lombardi the autonomy and authority Lombardi wanted as both head coach and general manager.

Olejniczak said that Lombardi's name was the only one presented to the board of directors. Of the 45 directors, 27 were on hand. The vote was 26-1 to accept Lombardi. This came after what Olejniczak described as a "healthy discussion."

(Excerpt about Lombadi and Jack Vainisi )) From Vic Ketchman Who was responsible for bringing Lombardi to Green Bay and how did that happen?

Jack Vainisi identified him and pursued him. Vainisi got Lombardi and got his players, too. His importance in this franchise’s success is not fully appreciated. http://www.packers.com/news-and-events/ask-vic/article-1/Brett-Favre-Remembering-his-come-from-behind-win-in-2001/0a75f4e4-fa91-4e03-acf0-24d86129c078

Thanks for talking about this. This is good stuff, but where does it come from? Can we have a source for this? Is it reliable? --Batard0 (talk) 06:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the already-cited reference in Pluto's book above, here are some further sources:

An article on Cincinnati's team website says: "After letting go Scooter McLean following a one-win season in 1958, Green Bay ownership phoned the legendary coach of the Cleveland Browns looking for a candidate and Brown gave them the name of the offensive assistant who got the Giants to run to daylight. Vincent Thomas Lombardi.
From That First Season by John Eisenberg: "Vainisi mentioned Lombardi to Ole in mid-December 1958. Ole already knew the name, having seen Lombardi at a coaching clinic in Ohio that fall. Tony Canadeo had suggested they attend the clinic to check out other coaches. Lombardi had commanded the classroom, exuding self-confidence. At Vainisi's suggestion, Ole called Bell, Halas, and Paul Brown. They repeated their praise. Lombardi, they said, was an innovative strategist and dynamic leader who believed in discipline ... Paul Brown told Ole the Packers might not be able to pry Lombardi away from the Giants because he was a lifelong New Yorker liked by the Mara family. If he stayed put, Brown said, he probably would succeed Howell as the Giants' head coach."
There's then this from The Vince Lombardi scrapbook by George Flynn: "Lombardi had great admiration for Paul Brown, the coach of the Cleveland Browns in those days. he knew Brown as a dedicated, successful coach and admired his methods. And Vince always liked to associate himself with successful people and have successful people around him. And so when Vince came to Green Bay, he always talked to Paul Brown about football and the players around the league, getting a line on what talent might be available"

It appears from these sources that there was some sort of connection between the two men. From the sources, I'd characterize it as something like: Lombardi admired Brown's success and consulted with him frequently. Green Bay's owners also asked for Brown's advice when they were considering hiring him in 1958. Do you agree with this? --Batard0 (talk) 06:37, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pacific Imperial Railroad may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

A) On March 3rd 2013, Pacific Imperial Railroad announced it has Filed a Verified notice of exemption
B) On March 27th, 2013 Pursuant to 49 U.S.C 10502(a) and 49 C.F.R 1180 2(d)(7), Pacific Imperial

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:02, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Marriage ‎ , but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:42, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing at Dave Hansen, Robert Cowles, Lena Taylor

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 32.218.47.98 (talk) 15:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Robert Cowles

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Robert Cowles. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 32.218.47.98 (talk) 19:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wisconsingary. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Venus (Shocking Blue song). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 01:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wisconsingary. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Venus (Shocking Blue song). - FlightTime (open channel) 01:04, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:07, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dick Harris (center)

The article Dick Harris (center) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Melcous (talk) 04:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dick Harris (center)

Hello Wisconsingary,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dick Harris (center) for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Earthh (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dick Harris (center)

The article Dick Harris (center) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I do not see the notability here. He was drafted high in the NFL draft and was a standout in college but after that he seems to have a very normal life. There may be something out there that I haven't found yet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ GB fan 20:29, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

THEN you better start deleting lot of NUMBER 1 football players in the NFL — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.59.200.10 (talk) 00:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wisconsingary. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harris Burgoyne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harris Burgoyne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harris Burgoyne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Narky Blert (talk) 05:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dick Harris (center)

Hello, Wisconsingary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dick Harris (center), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dick Harris (center)

Hello, Wisconsingary. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dick Harris".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:24, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Thanks for contributing to the article John Jefferson. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 17:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a Fact of Trade in the NFL between Packers and The Chargers .. IF you do Not want CORRECT facts,,, then I will not straighten up the mess !! Gary A. Tremble (talk) 18:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]