User talk:Wink1021/sandbox

Article evaluation

In this Evaluate Wikipedia Article exercise, I am going to talk about the Wikipedia page of Hans Wegner, who is a famous Danish furniture designer.

1. Everything in the article is relevant to the topic and organized. However, the article spent a lot of space to describe and separate his profile into Early Years, Mid Years and Later Years. In my opinion, all these three parts can be combined into one part Profile, paralleled to other two parts Honors and Key Designs.

2. The article is neutral, avoiding some words like most famous or any subject reviews.

3. Readers are more interested about a designer's artworks, at least no less than his profile. So, the Wikipedia page about Hans Wegner should have more information about his key furniture designs and artworks. Lots of Hans Wegner's designs are got many awards and are world-renowned pieces, but his key designs here are only some description without any links.

4. There are only five references of the article. One is a dictionary, two are books, another one is from NYT obituary and the last one is from a website with little information. I think the references are not quite reliable.

Wink1021 (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good thoughts here, and I agree with you about the lack of credible citations, Wink1021. --- FULBERT (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]