User talk:Winged Adult

Winged Adult, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Winged Adult! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, England cricket team, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 04:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rdp060707: Sure I was about to add a reliable source from ESPN Cricinfo and The Daily telegraph newspaper but you were just too quick on revert button. Winged Adult (talk) 04:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Winged Adult! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. POLITANVM ^talk 03:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Politanvm: Can you please point out the specific diff. Winged Adult (talk) 03:27, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Winged Adult, it’s many of them, but some specific examples:

Changing stats: [1] [2] [3]
Updating infobox: [4]
Adding content: [5]
Adding a reference: [6]
Adding a short description: [7]

It’s not that there’s anything wrong with the edits themselves, they just shouldn’t be marked as minor. POLITANVM ^talk 03:57, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Politanvm: Got it, thanks! Winged Adult (talk) 04:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Showbiz826 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Showbiz826. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:50, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Winged Adult (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked recently for being a sock of Showbiz but I request another administraitor to please review my block as my editing interst are very different from Showbiz who is a commited caste warrior whereas most of my edits are on cricket related articles like updating stats of players etc. Further this sock contributes from a mobile device which I don't as most of my edits are from a mobile device even on the SPI the user who reported me himself is a caste promoter. My IP range is also diff. from this user, I explained why my block is irrelevant therefore please unblock my account as our editing habits (edit summaries, interset areas are very diff. from each other) Thanks. Winged Adult (talk) 00:48, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was established through technical and behavioural methods and is not in doubt. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.