User talk:Windscorpion

This is Windscorpion's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Napoleon Oak (Lausanne) (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Napoleon Oak instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Napoleon Oak (Lausanne) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispe ring 20:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Windscorpion, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispe ring 20:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Napoleon Oak (Lausanne) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Napoleon Oak (Lausanne). Thanks! joe decker ^talk 22:41, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Napoleon Oak (Lausanne) (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kiteinthewind was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A tree that happens to be present during a French military figure's march to a European country is not too notable, to be brutally honest. Trees included in List of notable trees are there for a number of reasons, ranging from having living for over a millennium to other geographical or topographical reasons. Please work on including more sources that can attest to this tree's notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Napoleon Oak (Lausanne) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Napoleon Oak (Lausanne), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 07:57, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleon Oak

I see a draft you created in your sandbox and then submitted to WP:AFC was moved to Draft:Napoleon Oak (Lausanne) and then rejected (wrongly in my opinion). I came across the draft because it was about to be deleted for not having been edited in the last six months. That would have been a great shame. I have made some changes to the draft and I now think it is more clearly suitable as a full article. I hope this has been all right by you. Could you look at it again, please, and, if it is OK, then you (or I) could submit it again. Best wishes. Thincat (talk) 09:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I have made a few edits and resubmitted. Windscorpion (talk) 13:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Napoleon Oak (Lausanne) (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We do not need articles about some tree. Trees are only notable if they have a special geographic location or are very old (older than this one). In fact, I could just make an article about the tree in front of my house and it wouldn't be any less notable than this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Napoleon Oak (Lausanne) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Napoleon Oak (Lausanne), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 17:53, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleon Oak (growing older!)

I have raised the matter of how Draft:Napoleon Oak (Lausanne) has been AFC reviewed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#Reviewing standards. I very much hope this is not going to cause any difficulty for you. Best wishes. Thincat (talk) 05:42, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Napoleon Oak (Lausanne) has been accepted

Napoleon Oak (Lausanne), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ƒirefly ( t · c · who? ) 07:48, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ficus drupacea has been accepted

Ficus drupacea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:14, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ficus drupacea var. pubescens has been accepted

Ficus drupacea var. pubescens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:23, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Phaseolus dumosus, from its old location at User:Windscorpion/Phaseolus dumosus. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:10, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phaseolus dumosus has been accepted

Phaseolus dumosus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]