User talk:WimpyDood

WimpyDood, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi WimpyDood! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Removing uncited material

Hi Wimpy Dood, I see your recent edits include removal of several uncited sections and phrases. Maybe it would be better to just add a Citation needed tag? And also, if you are already active in a particular region, maybe also look for a source before just removing it? The phrase on the Autonomy Accord for Kurds in Iraq should be easy to adapt and source. There exists the article Iraqi–Kurdish Autonomy Agreement of 1970. For other phrases Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Paradise Chronicle. Much of the information I removed has gone uncited for years, so I was thinking that removal makes more sense. Although I do agree, perhaps I should place more tags. I will look more into the article and try to add information from sources later. If you strongly object to any of the removals in particular please let me know. - WimpyDood (talk) 08:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Purple Barnstar

		The Purple Barnstar
		For having had to deal with sockpuppets' repeated accusations of misconduct. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:11, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:24, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ZaniGiovanni's concerns

Please note that ZaniGiovanni, on the other hand, is not a sockpuppet. Please assume good faith when dealing with them, and listen to their concerns. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @ToBeFree: of course! I will. I would like to thank you for your patience and diligence in handling the sockpuppeting case of BaxçeyêReş and other affiliated accounts. You have been extremely helpful in dealing with the situation and I am really very grateful. Also thank you very much for the Barnstar, I deeply appreciate it. I sincerely wish you all the best. - WimpyDood (talk) 03:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Needed

On many pages you've placed multiple citation needed tags, and in other cases removed statements with such tags. When you are adding tags, or removing tagged sections, please first consider making a reasonable effort to find a reference yourself. Maidyouneed (talk) 07:37, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guidence

Hello, I'm a fairly new user and I looked at your past edits in your alt account about azerbaijani food and I loved it, RESPECT. As for why I'm here I've been having some trouble adapting to having disputes on controversial articles an could use some guidence, maybe on "showering with Wikilove" perhaps. I saw that you were engaged in some yourself but I also saw that you were kind and effective, which is why I decided to seek your guidence in particular. If you do not wish to "get your hand dirty" I completely understand. Also I wanted to ask some questions about the cuisine if that's ok. Cheers! Hank the Sniper (talk) 04:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]