User talk:Wilpy590

Welcome!

Hello, Wilpy590! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 21:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trixie and Katya (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Style and performance section is unsourced. Also, not sure what content this article can provide that is not already largely covered between their individual articles, UNHhhh and Trixie and Katya's Guide to Modern Womanhood.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trixie and Katya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Trixie and Katya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd refer to the page for Double act where you can find links to many many other pages of comedic duo. Those pages exist even if the two people in the duo have their own individual pages. The whole point of a double act is that it is a brand of its own. People will search for Laurel and Hardy, even though Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy have their own individual pages.

In terms of referencing I can add some to the specific section. Wilpy590 (talk) 11:05, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's interesting in the Double act article is Laurel and Hardy's individual articles are linked there rather than the duo article, which seems wrong. Anyway, I see your point. I went back and forth about it and the additional sources were helpful. Also, for biographies of living people citations are required for essentially all claims made so keep that in mind as well. It is likely content regarding the duo in their individual articles should be trimmed and a hatnote added to refer to Trixie and Katya (now blue!). Good job, especially for your first article. Thanks for creating it! S0091 (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another suggestion is to rewrite the leads on some the on the other articles, for example Trixie and Katya's Guide to Modern Womanhood, to refer to Trixie and Katya rather than their individual articles. S0091 (talk) 15:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I've taken your advice and added links to some relevant pages (in the least disruptive way possible ofc). I also noticed you added a lot of links from other pages so thank you for that! :) Wilpy590 (talk) 16:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wilpy590! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 15:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trixie and Katya has been accepted

Trixie and Katya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 15:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. Thank you for your recent contributions to William Ellard. I noticed that you added an image to the article's infobox as a thumbnail. In future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox, as this is against the Manual of Style. When adding an image, supply only the filename to the |image= parameter and the caption to the |caption= parameter instead. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using; please consult the Template page for the infobox being used on that page for proper instructions and documentation. Thanks! - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 22:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]