User talk:William Saturn/2021

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding an article

Hi, I have recently created an article "George H. W. Bush 1992 presidential campaign". Since you have created and contributed to many articles related to presidential campaigns, which are good articles of Features articles, could you please help in improving the article, as I want to nominate it for GA. I have already requested it to be copy-edited. Thank-you! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at it.William S. Saturn (talk) 00:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you!! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:35, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@William S. Saturn Hi, thanks for copy-editing the article. If you have completed copy editing, kindly add the Done tag (

Done) on the request page (Guild of copy editors) and {{GOCE}} tag on articles talk page, as I want to nomintae it for GAN. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I read the article and did a cursory copy edit but there's still much more copy editing to be done. The article is a good outline and organizes the material well but it needs a lot more.

There's too much background information on Bush in the lead. The article itself is heavy on background as well, which is fine, but the other sections are less detailed. The info on the Republican primary and his opponents is sparse. There's more about the Democratic primary than it. For example, Alan Keyes is first introduced as having won delegates for the convention. How did that come about?

There's little mention about how Bush tried to make this election about foreign affairs. It mentions the Gulf War but it misses the fall of the Berlin Wall, the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the military intervention in Panama. The culture war was a major theme of this election as well, so it's good that you included Pat Buchanan's convention speech, but there's more. Dan Quayle's Murphy Brown feud and Bush's criticism of the Simpsons are part of that. The "Thousand points of light" was also something Bush emphasized, which was a precursor of his son's "Compassionate conservatism". The economy is thought to have factored more than anything else, however, and James Carville's quote "it's the economy, stupid" needs to be there somewhere.

It should be noted that there's a common belief the reason Bush lost the election was because of the "spoiler effect" with Ross Perot. In addition, the Bush campaign may have employed "dirty tricks" in allegedly threatening to release salacious photos of Perot's daughter to convince him to withdraw from the race.

There's nothing about the rest of Bush's life, particularly how he became like a surrogate father to Bill Clinton afterwards. And what effect did this campaign have on future campaigns, such as those of Dan Quayle, George W. Bush, and Jeb Bush. What role did George W. and Jeb have in this campaign? Why did Quayle run for president against George W. in 2000?William S. Saturn (talk) 05:59, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@William S. Saturn Hi, thanks a lot for your help and suggestions. I have tried to add the mentioned points in the article as suggested by you. Also, I have shifted some of the information from background to Presidency section. Kindly let me know of any changes required in the article, and is the article still missing some important information about the campaign? Thank-you! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject United States presidential elections

Template:WikiProject United States presidential elections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject United States presidential elections/editintro

Template:WikiProject United States presidential elections/editintro has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The America We Deserve.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The America We Deserve.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]