User talk:WillWalker23

Welcome!

Hello, WillWalker23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Adolphus79 (talk) 14:22, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kesha Wayne Coyne Studio.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kesha Wayne Coyne Studio.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fixer23 (talk) 22:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dirty Love (Ke$ha song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dirty Love (Ke$ha song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirty Love (Ke$ha song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 10:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of You Control My Heart (Kesha song)

The article You Control My Heart (Kesha song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Song hasn't even come out yet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Statυs (talk) 10:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Supernatural (Ke$ha song)

The article Supernatural (Ke$ha song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Song hasn't even come out yet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Statυs (talk) 10:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Your recent song articles...

Hello, your recent new articles about Kesha's unreleased songs are not notable enough yet for their own articles... Please read the song notability guidelines before creating any more... Also, please do not use the $ in her name in the article titles, as per Wikipedia's naming conventions... Thank you, and happy editing... Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you need any help... - Adolphus79 (talk) 15:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, as you did with Dirty Love (Ke$ha song). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. The article you are redirecting to, Kesha's second studio album, is also the subject of an AfD discussion. Sionk (talk) 19:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Die Young (Kesha song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Die Young (Kesha song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die Young (Kesha song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 19:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Die Young (Kesha song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Die Young (Kesha song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sionk (talk) 19:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Die Young Kesha Official.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Die Young Kesha Official.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mephistophelian (talk) 21:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Die Young official.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Die Young official.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Mephistophelian (talk) 21:56, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Die Young (Kesha song). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 18:38, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Truth About Love (Pink album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 19:31, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Judging from the article history, your edit to this article was just a revert to a past revision, which consequently dismissed any contributions made in between. Please avoid making mass changes to articles, especially without an explanation. Many aspects of the article were corrected and expanded prior to your revision. Dan56 (talk) 19:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per WP:MOS/Lists, bulleted lists are not appropriate where you edited. Dan56 (talk) 17:25, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Die Young (Black Sabbath song), you may be blocked from editing. This was clearly yet another attempt to recreate an article, Die Young (Kesha song) that was deleted after an Articles for Deletion decision. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Sionk (talk) 21:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Die Young (song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Die Young (song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sionk (talk) 17:36, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Die Young official.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Die Young official.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Die Young. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Since your recent contributions were deleted following the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die Young (Kesha song), your attempts at recreating the material are plainly disruptive, as are your attempts at supplanting pre-existing articles. Mephistophelian (talk) 17:51, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kesha Warrior Deluxe.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Kesha Warrior Deluxe.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Die Young (Ke$ha song)

Your request at Talk:Die Young (Ke$ha song) seems reasonable, but will require and admin to make the change. I have made a note at the admin notice board Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Change_of_redirect_of_a_locked_page if you would like to add additional rationale. -- The Red Pen of Doom 21:05, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rihanna's seventh studio album

Please don't move article out of incubation back into mainspace prematurely. The Afd came to a consensus, and you can't restore the page in defiance of that. It will be eventually restore, but please let someone else make that decision. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:57, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. The revision is explained here in an edit summary. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 18:40, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kesha VMAs 2012.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Kesha VMAs 2012.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kesha image

Hi there. Looks like we keep bumping heads. Like talk about the infobox image on Kesha. I understand that you would like to add a more recent picture of Kesha to her article. It makes to do so and would help us be more accurate in our encyclopedia entry on her, but the image you would like to use is copyrighted by Getty Images. Their copyright claim can be circumvented with a fair-use rationale, but I do not believe that we have sufficient grounds for justifying the use of their image. If we could come up with some sort of critical commentary that justified its inclusion, then I would encourage you to keep it there; unfortunately, we can't at this time. At present, we have a dozen or so (yes, they are outdated) images of Kesha that can be freely used without worry of possible legal trouble. Right now, updating the image to be the most recent possible is not the highest priority for that article either. I would recommend that checking Flickr routinely, until a free image of her shows up. I'm willing to bet, however, that a high quality image won't surface into her next tour, though. If you have any questions about fair use or copyright, I would recommend looking here: WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. :) --Thevampireashlee (talk) 06:49, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! A bunch of new, freely licensed images of her have cropped up. Take a look at them here and help me decide which ones we should use to decorate her articles. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 22:41, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Please refrain from making this change to Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded. The guideline for the singles template is clearly cited in the article, bookending the template in the infobox reading "per Template:Infobox album#Template:Singles, do not add songs from re-releases". Any further edits against this guideline will be considered disruptive. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 17:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Internet leak, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 02:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warrior

Hi there. I have some questions regarding your recent edits on Warrior (Kesha album). Could you please engage with me in dialogue before changing the article again? I would greatly appreciate that. I have opened a discussion here. Meet you there. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 00:02, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Kesha Iggy Pop.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kesha Iggy Pop.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 07:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WiD (musician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WiD (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Phileasson (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Phileasson (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dirty Love (Kesha song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dirty Love (Kesha song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirty Love (Kesha song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:08, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kesha Dirty Love.ogg)

Thanks for uploading File:Kesha Dirty Love.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Japan Cover Warrior Kesha.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Japan Cover Warrior Kesha.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Die Young (song) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Die Young (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Die Young (song) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Die Young (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Die Young (song) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Die Young (song), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bubbling Under positions

The Bubbling Under charts do not function as an extension to their parent charts, and the positions do not correspond to the 100+position. The eligibility rules are different: a song cannot fall off the Hot 100 onto the Bubbling Under charts. That means if the song that would be number 101 on an extended Hot 100 chart was ever on the Hot 100, it won't show up on the Bubbling Under chart at all. The only time Bubbling Under positions 1-25 would be the same as positions 101-125 on the Hot 100 would be if no song in those 25 positions had ever charted. I'm willing to bet that has never happened in the history of the chart.

WP:Record charts explicitly says that positions should be listed as they were before you damaged the Kesha discography article: uncharted, with a footnote explaining the Bubbling under position.—Kww(talk) 02:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lipsha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lipsha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lipsha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Chase (talk / contribs) 04:22, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emeli Sande Our Version Of Events Re-release Album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emeli Sande Our Version Of Events Re-release Album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Young and Reckless listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Young and Reckless. Since you had some involvement with the Young and Reckless redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not Obsessed listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Not Obsessed. Since you had some involvement with the Not Obsessed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]