User talk:Wilkus

History of Science WikiProject

Hi, and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! Based on your userpage, you might be interested in joining the History of Science WikiProject. You can browse the lastest project newsletter to see what some other editors have been doing lately with the histories of science, medicine and technology. Cheers--ragesoss (talk) 01:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dick Fenkiel.tif

A tag has been placed on File:Dick Fenkiel.tif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 22:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helen Marshall (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Helen Marshall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Wilkus, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Lowrie Marshall

Hi. All you need are sources. Go to a the library and access an engine that can do archive searches of old newspapers. I just typed "Helen Lowrie Marshall" into a Proquest news search and dozens of articles came up. She was a very successful poet. I added aome info form an article in the Christian Science Monitor, but I found that on a search of her first Doubleday title. Once I realized what a major writer she was, I typed on her name - and discovered copious sourcing. Just add a few sources and resubmit - and Thank You for adding a valuable article to Wikipedia. I hope you'll join us and edit more.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the articles came up under the full name: Helen Lowie Marshall. You should figure out which name she published under, and resubmit the article under that name. Best,E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tougher than I thought. She was an extremely popular poet who got / gets no respect in "serious" sources. Her poem "After Glow" continues to be wildly popular today. but the myriad sources I wrote you about yesterday, aside from the profile I added, were mere mentions of her name in stories where one of her poems was read, usually at a funeral. there has to be another profile or two out there. Or perhaps a reliable source discussing the enduring popularity of After Glow. It may take some serious searching. Best.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:07, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources: [1], [2],

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helen Marshall (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Helen Marshall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Helen Marshall concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Helen Marshall, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]