User talk:Wile e2005

Hello My Name is Marco.This is how the walt disney classics song goes. As it follows:

I believe you are doing the 1988-1994 Black Diamond Classics jingle, right?

License tagging for Image:Gogogadgetmobile.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gogogadgetmobile.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Talk about the WDHV logos

Since we can't discuss them on the talk pages for the articles, I thought, maybe bring them up here.

I need to tell you that the FBI warnings have been on videos since 1978. Yes, I am well aware of the blue screen with the arial font (it's on the Cartoon Classics tapes), but the early warnings were on blue background with Times New Roman font. The blue FBI screen sometimes has a dark red background.

I am well aware of a variation of the 1986 WDHV logo with a "presents" below. I saw this on a Schoolhouse Rock tape. I uploaded a version with no volume on youtube.com. Have you seen this on any cassettes? Because I am going to a thrift store soon.

Hey! I know you! You're DanDMan16! Skymac207 17:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I went to this website that showed two screens. First, the orange FBI screen saying, "Duplication in whole or in part of this videocassette is prohibited," and also the same words on the green FBI screen. Have you seen these on a cassette before? I assume it's on version two of the Robin Hood print, since the green FBI screens were introduced on that one.

It is. It also shows up like that on the Lady and the Tramp video, where it just does "Licensed for private..." and then "Duplication in whole..." --Wile e2005 14:02, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strange, my Lady and the Tramp print shows the FBI warning and the "Licensed" screen. Imax80 20:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The 1981 video release of Dumbo (since I own it) has something odd on it. First, there is a red FBI screen from the early 1980s (a switchover from the blue one) and a blue warning screen after it. The early videos (1980-1983) have the MPAA rating on a blue screen after the "Neon Mickey" logo.

On the first Cartoon Classics series, there was a cut-off version of the Neon Mickey logo with the slogan, "The magic lives on." During my visit to a thrift or collectibles store someday, these cassettes are on my mind-

Robin Hood 1991 with green FBI screens
Volume 1 of the Sing-Along Songs (December 1986, a rarity)
Any tape from the original Cartoon Classics series (1983-1986)
The Black Hole 1980 VHS (first ever by WDHV)
A Dream Called Walt Disney World 1981 (I can't resist, I heard it's extremely obsolete)
1991 reprints of 1980s Black Diamond editions (the only one I have is Dumbo with the ink on the cassette tape).
Black Padded Clamshells of Dumbo, Robin Hood, and Sword in the Stone (I only have Pinocchio)

Wile e2005 please upload 1992 version black diamond logo clean music on youtube.com. Just for me and other people please!

If you find out about the rare logos and FBI screens, please tell me. Imax80

Wille 2005, Imax80 is saying that green FBI screens came out in 1992. Is he right Wille 2005?

Something you need to do if you are a logo fan...

http://imdb.com/title/tt0096707/board/flat/51862965 --The Track Master 20:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I already signed it! --Wile e2005 00:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did as well. --Imax80 22:40, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you been banned from youtube.com?

Hey wile e2005, I went ot youtube.com to watch that Robin Hood parody you recorded, and it wouldn't let me, and your account said you have been suspended from youtube, why? Imax80 22:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. I think it could have been a video I uploaded or something. Besides, I wasn't really suspended... I was EXPELLED. :( --Wile e2005 15:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that sucks. Can you at least comment on videos anymore? I mean, none of your videos were bad, I really enjoyed them, I think they got mad because of the Robin Hood parody. Some people can't laugh these days, ya know? I still use youtube.com. Imax80 00:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks. --Wile e2005 20:33, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - What were your favorite videos? I myself like the Robin Hood- Dude Looks Like a Lady skit, and the Sulley become the Cookie Monster, I was the first one to rate and comment that video. Imax80 05:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - - I am not sure which ones I liked best, actually --Wile e2005 16:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - - - I'll start posting videos in October/November, that's when I get my camera or whatsoever. What do I need to post a video on youtube.com? Because my birthday is coming next month. Imax80 00:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - - - If you're recording stuff with a camera or whatever, you will need a video capture unit. --Wile e2005 01:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - - - Any suggestions on what kind of camera I should use, and what video capture unit is the best? And what do you do with a video capture unit. Sorry for so many questions, it's because my video camera from the 1980s broke a long time ago. Imax80 14:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - - - I use a Hi-8 camera and Dazzle Capture unit. With that you record off of video cameras or VCRs or DVDs onto your computer to make clips. Try a digital Mini-DV camera.

- - - - Thanks, because I want to videotape my drawings and do voiceovers and make a storyboard. To put a song in the background, I'll have to use the iHome I'm getting this October. Imax80 18:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About the 1989 releases of Dumbo and Sword

A link to the this is on my talk page, because Dumbo and Sword's new packages hit the markets September 1989, and use the old tape master. In 1991, they were replaced with the newer ones with the newer logos. Imax80 18:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! So I have the 1989 version of "Dumbo." --Wile e2005 01:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right you are. I have the 1991 version. Imax80 03:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, you don't! You & Imax80 have the 1991 version. Mr.Walker 17:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will you shut up? I saw the 1989 ad, and you didn't, so zip it. --Imax80 21:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the words of Imax80, "A 1989 cover of Dumbo & Sword in the Stone, that's a lie!" Mr.Walker 15:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC0

I am telling you! The 1989 Dumbo/Sword cover thing is ALL TRUE!!! I have the 1989 version, since it has the newer cover artwork and the mid-80s tape master (the 1984 Classics logo fades out right as the music ends on this version), as well as a newer label for it (it's a white label with a newer "DUMBO" logo on it and a new font for "Walt Disney's" over it; the CLASSICS print logo and FBI legal stuff is still the same.

The 1991 version uses the 1989 cover artwork, and a newer tape master and label with white ink and uses the 1988 Classics logo.

But I don't get it why it says the running time is 63 minutes. It might have said that because they cut the RKO logo. If you include the FBI warnings and Classics logo, then the running time is 64 minutes, like the movie's supposed to be. --Wile e2005 15:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Based on Good Ideas, Bad Ideas from Animaniacs) It's time for another True Info, False Info. True Info: What Wile e 2005 said. False Info: What annonymous users say. The End Skymac207 16:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Skymac vandlized one of your edits

That Skymac207 dude (now he is Mr. Wheeler), has vandalized a comment you put on the WD Classics talk page. It says,"I believe Skymac and everything he says!" Imax80 21:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT THE HECK???!!! THAT'S BAD! --Wile e2005 15:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't wait until that idiot gets banned for vandalism. He vandalized my talk page, that annyoing idiot. Imax80 20:57, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, your the idiot! Its' true what I say, I'm know everything about Disney & I grew up with Disney & some sites believe is what I say is true. Why can't you get that through your stupid tiny brains? Are you too stupid to know that? Skymac207 18:41, 24 September 2006.

Of course they're not stupid, Skymac, which is the reason for your latest damnation to blockage. --Ryanasaurus0077 22:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I HAVE COME FOR MY REVENGE ON YOU, WILLE2005! Skymac207 17:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are a very hateful person if you want revenge on someone you don't even know in reality. --Imax80 21:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my god, Imax80, honest to god you're an idiot! I know that morron Wille2005 from Youtube. Why? Because I too am a member at Youtube, named Systemoperator! He kept arguing with me on everything I said! Skymac207 20:51, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant was, you don't know him "in person." Besides, Wile hasn't visited here on anywhere else in a while. And I am not an idiot, so keep the insults to yourself. --Imax80 23:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't plan to have my revenge on him in person (although it would be nice to), I rather plan to have my revenge on him right here 'cause its easier! Skymac207 12:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good news, Wile

I got the 1985 Pinocchio VHS in the white clamshell and the 1986 tape re-master. Now it will go great with the 1985 black clamshell which I have had since last fall. Imax80 20:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool! Of course, I got the 1993 version, because I used to rent that version from my local Blockbuster. But for videos with the 1984 Classics logo, I've got "Dumbo" and "Alice in Wonderland," and of course, "Lady and the Tramp." --Wile e2005 02:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rental stores are always an excellent source for getting old Disney videos. My state gets a store called "Tommy K's Video" and the one in my town has a ton of old videos. This is where I got my 1984 "Robin Hood" print and my 1986 "The Sword in the Stone" print. They also used to have the pink cover of Dumbo. They had several videos from the early 1980s as well.

Also, I heard tell that the 1986 tape re-master of "Pinocchio" holds the dark red FBI screens and the video dealer announcement, which also appears on my 1986 "Sleeping Beauty" print. I currently have all seven of the videos that use the 1984 Classics logo. If you need to know what's on them, there's the usual, red FBI screens, and then the cheesy logo. Although some copies of "Sword" have a trailer for "The Journey of Natty Gan" on it. --Imax80 02:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah & some copies of the 1985 edition of Pinocchio have a trailer for The Black Cauldron. Does anyone know whether or not some copies of the 1986 edition of Alice in Wonderland have a trailer for The Great Mouse Detective? Mr.walker 15:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I know the answer: no. --Ryanasaurus007 03:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do some copies of Sleeping Beauty have a trailer for the 1986 re-issue of Lady & the Tramp? Skymac207 11:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. --Ryanasaurus007 03:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where there any films released on the same day as Pinocchio, that use the 1983 Neon Mickey logo? Skymac207 18:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, the WDHE Neon Mickey from 1978 was last seen in 1983 or 1984. --Ryanasaurus007 00:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know that, I meant were there any titles that came out the same day as Pinocchio, but use the 1983 HV logo? Skymac207 17:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is with youtube?

They are banning all my favorite videos, and coming up with excuses like "copyright infringement." What is that all about? Almost every TV show I upload is removed, or logo or anything else whatsoever. When I submit videos to youtube, I may want to submit a logo, so I might to put all the copyright stuff on it so I don't get expelled. --Imax80 21:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, you must be ignorant. You have to buy the rights if you want to upload anything, you fool! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.63.21.66 (talk) 14:17, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandals

It appears that somebody who is using abusive sockpuppets is continually Vandalising your article, I' am Professor Sunderland a wikipedian and heavy contrubutor to Wikipedia, I have reverted the vandalisim and will now report it to an administrator. Good day Professor Sunderland 13:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 13:45 11 November 2006[reply]

Thanks for submitting those pictures

Good job, Wile. I think you got them all. --Imax80 22:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, actually, not ALL of them yet. I have some friends that can help, though. --Wile e2005 22:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still a very good job. Do you want me to submit any of my covers? I have the first three releases, Robin Hood on Beta, Dumbo and Pinocchio on VHS, all in their black clamshells.

BTW, the 1985 Dumbo cassette uses the Neon Mickey logo, strange isn't it? --Imax80 01:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that is strange. I imagine later prints with the black clamshell (from mid-1986) use the regular Classics logo. --Wile e2005 18:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was an urgent repackaging. Since Dumbo was originally in the WDHV in the 1980s, when they were mastering it in 1983-84 with the Neon Mickey, they were intending it to be a WDHV re-release, but as they staretd the Classics, I guess they were too lazy to change and put the Classics label on the tape and sold it that way, and not cutting out the "Walt Disney and Promo" which is at the end of it like the old one. --Imax80 19:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BambiClassics.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BambiClassics.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 20:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ATTENTION EVERYONE!

May I have your attention, everyone, please? Thank you! I have some good news to tell you & everybody a member of this website, the 1984 classics logo is now (re)-uploaded on Youtube. So, if you want to go there & check it out, then go to Youtube & see it yourself. Skymac207 17:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the 1986 home video logo's (re)-uploaded & so's the 1988 original classics logo, as well as the regular version. You can see it for yourself, 'ya know. Mr.wheeler 12:03, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

& now the 1992 electronic disorted muffled classics logo's (re)-uploaded & once again, I suggest you can see if for yourself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MzpNDw82ws

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45dlFlTqwws

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1C8X0NoOis&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7Qo5b4nlUA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JXUlRZAVlQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUYUPb-MgL0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xnEl4ssXuY

Enjoy! Skymac207 21:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What logo is in the very first link?? Gabrielkat 21:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1986 WDHV logo. Skymac207 13:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:AdobePremiereElements3.0.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AdobePremiereElements3.0.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rare variation of "Sword in the Stone"

Hey, there was a version of "The Sword in the Stone" in 1988 where the heading read, "WALT DISNEY'S" along with the black words "VHS" was removed from the bottom. They did the same thing to the covers of "Dumbo" and "Alice in Wonderland", so you were right, those three titles had re-prints in 1988, but all the tape masters were packaged in the 1989 cases.

You have the 1988 tape variation of "Dumbo" and "Alice in Wonderland" since they don't have the black line in the middle of the label. "The Sword in the Stone" was the same way, but with "WALT DISNEY'S" as the heading. Ever see this version? --Imax80 20:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did. --Wile e2005 20:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Imax80, those 1988 copies of Dumbo & The Sword in the Stone are really from February 5, 1988 'cause 1. That was the 1st 1988 release date. 2. There were 1988 VHS, such as Walt Disney Mini Classics: The Wind in the Willows, Walt Disney Cartoon Classics: Special Edition & the 1988 print of Disney Sing Along Songs: You Can Fly! were released on that day. Same thing with your Lady & the Tramp VHS. That copy of Alice in Wonderland that has the 1984 FBI warnings slideshow, instead of fading, is from October 13, 1987 'cause I have a VHS Walt Disney Cartoon Classics: vol.9: Starring Chip 'n' Dale released on the same day & has that thing too. Skymac207 23:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Little Mermaid

I heard you owned a copy of The Little Mermaid with reformed art. If you have it, could you tell me if it has the vertical white label texture or the vertical silk-screening texture? 'Cause then I can indicate what the 1991 re-print has. Mr.sailor 10:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The art isn't reformed. It's a rental copy, so it doesn't have the old label. It was copied from an official version of the 1990 print. --Wile e2005 15:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. I was actually wondering if there were any copies that didn't show the phallus. Mr.sailor 11:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Print Date

I have a question, what is the print date (print dates are on the bottom of the tape) of your Robin Hood cassette with the green FBI screens and the 1988 Classics logo? --Imax80 21:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will try and look. --Wile e2005 23:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I say it's September 20, 1991 'cause Jungle Book was one of trailers on Robin Hood, but was already out on VHS. Rescuers Down Under was another preview offered on Robin Hood and was coming soon. So, when Rescuers Down Under came out, Robin Hood was still in progression of editing and they decided to cut the previews out of there, replace the FBI warnings with new green one's because they had to and replace the cut-short 1989 WDC logo with the older 1988 logo, because it was the only one available at the moment. Skymac207 23:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looney Tunes

I've managed to get myself into a revert war with some "loonies" over the point of trivia you entered on January 16th. I don't see anything wrong with it being in the article, and it's clear there is no actual connection... or is there? I wonder who named the "toonie" that way? Wahkeenah 02:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't submit that "loony toonies" thing! That was someone else. --Wile e2005 02:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, you're right, I was off by a line in the history. The actual submitter, oddly enough, was someone named Richard Weil. Wahkeenah 03:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You Won't Believe This!

You won't believe what I just saw, but I just saw a copy of Aladdin that had after the FBI warnings, a "Coming to Theaters From Walt Disney Pictures" logo in a different font, before The Lion King trailer. Skymac207 12:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:WaltDisneyClassicsprintlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WaltDisneyClassicsprintlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:WaltDisneyClassics84-87.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WaltDisneyClassics84-87.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:WaltDisneyClassics1988.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WaltDisneyClassics1988.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WaltDisneyClassics88-94.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WaltDisneyClassics88-94.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 15:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Inspectorgadgetmobile.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Inspectorgadgetmobile.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Pinocchiofront.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pinocchiofront.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:PinnaclesStudioPlus10.7.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PinnaclesStudioPlus10.7.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Braindog.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Braindog.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:40, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Braindog.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Braindog.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BertAndWolf.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BertAndWolf.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AdobePremiereElements3.0.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AdobePremiereElements3.0.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BertAndWolf.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BertAndWolf.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PinnaclesStudioPlus10.7.jpg

I have tagged Image:PinnaclesStudioPlus10.7.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Jusjih (talk) 03:53, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That image is no longer needed. I don't know how to delete files you upload, though. --Wile e2005 (talk) 14:04, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:News-PiedPiper.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:News-PiedPiper.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:News-WrongDwarves.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:News-WrongDwarves.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

What makes you think that the Viacom "Wigga-Wigga" logo premiered in fall 1990 instead of January 1, 1990? Is it because you've seen something from early 1990 with the "V of Steel"? Gabrielkat (talk) 14:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I remember someone posting on CLG saying that the print Wigga-Wigga logo debuted on January 1, 1990, but the animated version did not debut until fall 1990. --Wile e2005 (talk) 17:13, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help

Thanks! --213.40.96.218 (talk) 04:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome... helping for what? --Wile e2005 (talk) 04:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PinnacleStudio11.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:PinnacleStudio11.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Mask as a Wolf.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Mask as a Wolf.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MGMBigBadWolf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MGMBigBadWolf.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For your fire alarm photos, etc. from Massaoit[sic]. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 02:39, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Caillou, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. I don't know what show YOU'RE watching, but none of that is in "Caillou". GJC 03:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well this is according to most sources I've seen, and the clips of this version of Caillou are on YouTube. It is the original 1998 version. --Wile e2005 (talk) 02:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube is very rarely a citeable source--but throw the link here anyway--I'm dying to see this! Maybe it's just in Canada?? I've NEVER seen an American episode with that.GJC 02:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is only in Canada. Here is a YouTube link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQpXge3nOT4

--Wile e2005 (talk) 04:20, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well shut my flappin' jaw. I admit it: I was wrong. Now, the question is, how can that be incorporated into the article, or should it be--being as it's only in Canada? and do they still show this bit in the current versions, or no? Also, since youtube links generally get removed just on general principles, how would you propose to cite it? Anyhoo, please accept my apologies; I was totally off on this one! GJC 04:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gadgetreadingmessage.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gadgetreadingmessage.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chillum 05:49, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:SesameNewsLogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:SesameNewsLogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:FaradayDualActionPull.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:FaradayDualActionPull.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simplex40999003.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Simplex40999003.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:P7180074.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:P7180074.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A8UDI talk 17:10, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PinnacleStudio11.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PinnacleStudio11.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Merlin Second Banana.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Merlin Second Banana.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:AngelManfredy.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:AngelManfredy.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Braindog.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Braindog.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:InspectorGadget.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:InspectorGadget.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Corporal Capeman.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Corporal Capeman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gadgetreadingmessage.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gadgetreadingmessage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scooby-Doo! in Arabian Nights, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Ren & Stimpy Show episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twin Towers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:K-ORoxMascot.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:K-ORoxMascot.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of KaBlam! episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Voight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MGMBigBadWolf.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MGMBigBadWolf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ReptarOnIce.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ReptarOnIce.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Newcastlethunder.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Newcastlethunder.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]