WildBullMiller Media, LLC (formerly International Wrestling Alliance, #IWA), doing business as CoverYourAssetsII, is an American multinational mass media and entertainment conglomerate owned by #brending and headquartered in Etna Township. The company has film, television, cable networks, and publishing operations.

The company was formed in 1960 as John Zarlino, from the merger of Maria Gualandri and Joseph Vitale Zarlino. The current company consists largely of the assets of the former Brice Mall Innovative Investments and [[Border State Bank} retired ceo Robert J. Hager. ] Cinema City at MarketPlace Movie Tavern c. subsidiary until the merer), and theLaura Gaye White Smith #brendingnng Sysstem]] assets which acquiron June 12th, 1990. 6. Its assets incluany word on the internet that uses #brendingH CNN, [[DC Co], [[Ottertwitter.com/h shtag/brending of Otter Media|0date=August}</ref> and a 10% stake in [[facebook.com/hashtag/brending =August 3, 2016 |publisher=Variety}}</ref>

Hello World

This is my talk page. My frieds call me Wild Bull Miller. My name is Tom and I 💚 to entertain people in the ring.

I recently lost my leg due to medical issues, but will continue my life long dream of bringing a fun day to your neck of the woods. WildBullMiller (talk) 13:18, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:WildBullMiller/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:WildBullMiller/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:41, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WildBullMiller! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:41, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

I appreciate your answer and all of the various links that you provided me is there a different way of doing it it seems like the editors on here send you all over the place in order to get a simple thing done I am not a internetwork expert like you guys are so is there a simpler way of doing it I signed up for the beta program on here and thought that would help but that just created more people hating on me why are all of the editors on here so rude?

Speedy deletion nomination of European Lab for Learning and Intelligent Systems

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on European Lab for Learning and Intelligent Systems, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nick Moyes (talk) 19:48, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Once again another example of somebody being full of themselves I'm not creating any vandalism what are you talking about just because I'm not as smart as you are you don't have to pick on me what are you at bully?

July 2018

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Watkins Memorial High School, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) It didn't look like a test edit to me. It looked like a new editor making a good faith attempt to improve an article, but making a mistake. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:57, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on User talk:JamesBWatson were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 02:38, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) The easiest way to create a new talk page section is to click on the "new section" link at the top of the page. It automatically creates the section in the right place and with the right level of section heading, and also because it just gives an editing space for the new section, it avoids problems such as accidentally mixing your message into another section, and saves having to scroll all the way down if it's a very long talk page. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:57, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

=Watkins Memorial High School=

" JamesBWarson"

AI |

Thank You

I have no idea what you're talking about I didn't test edit anything I'm trying to just update my own personal life on here and every time I try to do anything I'm sent off into some weird Direction asking me to do this or that the one lady that did answer me was very helpful and she pointed out my original question and now I know how to use the history Button as far as test editing goes the only thing I want to test edit is my own personal life and how I can contribute to be a good editor I'm not trying to vandalize anything and I don't know as much as all of you but I'm willing to learn.

Cool

Thanks for the help. WildBullMiller (talk) 02:58, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advice relating to editing

Hi, Tom. You posted a message to my talk page. Normally I answer messages on the page where they were posted, to keep conversations together and make them easy to follow. This time, however, I have some things to say which I think may be more helpful if they are available to you on your talk page, rather than disappearing into one of my talk page archives after a while, so I am copying your message here and answering it here. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:46, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for your comment I am new at this and by no means whatsoever was I trying to be disruptive in any of my edits let me assure you that when I make an edit on here it is to improve the quality of the website there was an article written recently about artificial intelligence that referenced some European location that didn't exist so I created a talk page for that specific topic I did not create the initial document I was commenting on the one that was already on the website any advice would be fine from you but I do not do anything disruptive on purpose I apologize for any confusion in advance forward to learning how to become a 12-year veteran like yourself my career in the rain is over and I have nothing but time on my hands help others learn about my profession and about who I am and what I can do to contribute to the validity of this website I am also the beta testers with everything I do on here is in beta form. 🇺🇸 WildBullMiller (talk) 02:37, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At an early stage in your editing I saw an edit which looked like vandalism, but having looked at it again, having thought about it very carefully in light of what you have now said to me, and also having looked at some of your other editing, I am willing to believe that you made genuine mistakes, rather than intending vandalism. I will offer you some comments which I hope may be of some help to you. First I shall comment on the editing that my comment to your talk page was about, and then on other editing.
The meaning of some of what you have said in your message above is not clear to me, but I have tried to make as much sense of it as I can. You say that you "created a talk page", but the only talk page you have ever created is User talk:WildBullMiller, which doesn't seem to have any connection to what you have said above. I guess you must have intended the page European Lab for Learning and Intelligent Systems to be a talk page. If so then you created it under the wrong title, so that it appeared to be an article. You refer to "an article written recently about artificial intelligence". I don't know what article that is, so can you say what article it is? If you intended the page you created to be a talk page for an article called Foo Foo Bar then the title of that talk page should have been Talk:Foo Foo Bar. However, even if we assume that the page you created was an accidentally misplaced attempt to create a talk page for some unknown article, it was difficult to see what it was about. Nowhere did it mention the European Lab for Learning and Intelligent Systems. It consisted of separate sentences about different things, without any explanation of what they were all supposed to relate to. At first the sentences appeared to be unconnected to one another, though careful re-reading does reveal that almost all of them do refer to matters related in one way or another to creating machines or artificial beings, at least if we stretch a a few points such as viewing Aristotelean syllogisms as "mechanical thought".

I guess that what happened was probably more or less as follows. You saw some article somewhere about artificial intelligence. You were prompted to put together a few ideas about various historical mentions of things which in one way or another could be considered to be connected to artificial intelligence. Being inexperienced in how editing Wikipedia works, you created what you thought was a talk page, but which you accidentally made in "main space" instead of talk space, which means you created it as an article. Because you did not make it clear what you intended, and the page was not suitable as an article, it looked like vandalism. Is that about right?

Assuming that what I have said above is correct, there is one more thing that you should know about what you wrote. A talk page should be specifically for messages and discussions relating to editing the encyclopaedia, so that it may contain comments such as "I suggest we should change such and such a part of the article to say so and so", or "Can anybody provide a source to justify such and such a statement in this article?" Neither a talk page nor any other page on Wikipedia is a general forum for posting a collection of various odd thoughts on a subject.

Your recent edits to articles that I have looked at do seem to be attempts to improve those articles, so I no longer think you are vandalising anything. However, there are a couple of things I can say which may help you avoid some kinds of mistakes.

It is perfectly right to add a signature to anything you post to a talk page or discussion page by putting ~~~~ at the end of your post, but you should not add your signature to articles.
The purpose of a disambiguation page, such as Etna, Ohio, is to provide links to different articles that a reader may be looking for under that title. Your edit to that page did two things to links: it removed a link to an article, so anyone arriving at that disambiguation page would not have been able to find the article, and it added a link to an article which doesn't exist (and is never likely to exist under the title you gave), so that it would not help anyone to find any information.

I think somewhere in your editing you said that you were looking for mentoring. I'm not at all sure how easy it is to get a mentor. I have a vague feeling that there may be more editors wanting a mentor than there are editors willing to be mentors, but I may be wrong. I suggest looking at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user to see how to try to find a mentor. Once, something like seven years ago, I agreed to be a mentor for a new editor, but I don't think it's one of the things I am best at, so I haven't offered to do it again. However, If you have any specific questions I will help if I can.

I am sure there must be many other things that could be said to help you, but I hope that what I have said is some help. Sorry it's rather long: I find it difficult to keep things short when I write. I am also sorry to have contributed to a few negative experiences at the start of your time contributing to Wikipedia. I hope that your new career as a Wikipedia editor goes better from now on, now that you have unfortunately had to come to the end of your other career. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:46, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just one more thing that I didn't think to say before. We all make mistakes when we start editing. I did some things which now seem quite embarrassing. Keep going, and you will learn how things work. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hey Tom,

I'm letting you know that I reverted your edit to WarnerMedia, as you reset the page to a months-old stage for no particular reason. Your edit summary let me know that there is a discussion going on somewhere, would you be so kind to provide details and whereabouts of that discussion? If you have any other questions, related or not, please let me know (here or on my own talk page). Lordtobi (✉) 13:12, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse

Hi, I see you've been having difficulties with editing. The editors and hosts in the Teahouse might be able to assist you. Good luck! Trivialist (talk) 14:19, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article? Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Jac16888 ^Talk 13:33, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]