User talk:Wikiwritter22

Welcome!

Hello, Wikiwritter22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! FNN💎Wiki 10:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to TOLO (TV channel), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mandate for Syria and Lebanon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Aliaksandar Burbis, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing between different forms of English. It's very disruptive. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:57, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Brown Berets. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:06, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, the above warnings were why you were blocked. Not just the changes to your userpage, although it did appear as if you were gaming autoconfirmed. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:47, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiwritter22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry this time will be the last time, please unblock me

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 16:50, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiwritter22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it will be last time, I will be a good editor, I didn't know making changes in user page will block me

Decline reason:

You're a Confirmed sock puppet. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:44, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What was the purpose of your edits? 331dot (talk) 16:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I promise that I didn't know and, the articles that I was editing and reverted had really problem and grammar problems, I don't knowwhat was the problem that reverted

Please Wikipedia is much important for me, please unblock me

Not every statement needs to be an unblock request. If you don't know why you were doing what you did, that's all the more reason to leave you blocked, lest you have further lapses in memory or judgement in the future that could affect Wikipedia. Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 19:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"the articles that I was editing and reverted had really problem and grammar problems" no the ones I Saw did not. The spelling was simply a different spelling of the word in a different English variation. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok, can you please unblock me?

for the last time Wikiwritter22 (talk) 15:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. You're a sock. Request an unblock on your main account. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jafar Frotan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jafar Frotan. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:23, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]