User talk:Wikiuserleo

Welcome!

Hello, Wikiuserleo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! kashmiri 16:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moneybookers

Hello, I understand you might be frustrated with your experience with Moneybookers company - but Wikipedia does not serve for professing personal opinions (see WP:NOT). I was unable to locate any provision in the document that you had linked that would allow Moneybookers to close a customer's account and claim all the funds without notice. Thank you to paste a relevant quote on Talk:Moneybookers for discussion. Until then, please refrain from vandalising the article. kashmiri 16:45, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be clear about what this means. It looks like either a random chunk of the site's Terms of Service or an attempt to violate WP:NPOV.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 10:33, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There may be a conflict of interest here. Let's be clear about this: do you have an account with Moneybookers which has been suspended or terminated?--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 10:45, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Kashmiri. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Moneybookers seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. kashmiri 10:37, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There seem to be several problems with your editing of Moneybookers. I shall try to clarify the issues, in the hope that doing so may help you to understand what those problems are.

The statements you make about the terms of use of the company differ significantly from those given in the source you refer to, in several ways. For example, the section of the business's terms of use that you quote does not say that the company can "terminate their business relying solely on their own discretion": on the contrary, it specifies quite limited circumstances in which it may do so; nor does it state that such termination may take place "with no explanation". Nothing there suggests that the company can "keep any funds one will have there", or that termination will "mean loose of funds" (presumably you mean loss of funds).
Your statement that "by no means this source can be a safe place for financial operations" is your own judgement or opinion, and is not contained in the source you refer to. A Wikipedia article must be written from a neutral point of view, and must not contain an editor's own opinion or commentary, no matter how justifiable that editor thinks his or her point of view is.
The answer to "How Wikipedia may restrict from giving important information on financial organizations that may make you loose your money?" is as follows. Wikipedia's goal is to serve as a conveniently accessible source for information which is already published in reliable sources. We do not accept original publication of new contributions to human knowledge, including statements which are derived from reliable sources, but developed so as to go beyond what those sources say, as in the case of your statement that "by no means this source can be a safe place for financial operations". Wikipedia is not the place to try to expose or publicise facts that you think the world should know more about. You may find it helpful to read this section of the page Wikipedia:Tendentious editing. Also relevant are Wikipedia:Truth and Wikipedia:Advocacy.
If you disagree with one or more other editors, it is not helpful to keep on endlessly repeating the edits you want in the face of reversion by others. Doing so is known as edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

I hope that this will help you to understand some of the reasons why your edits have been objected to. Please feel free to contact me on my talk page if you have any questions about what I have written. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]