User talk:Wikipedian Right

Some righteousness pretender who's always pretending who's right.

— Wikipedian Right (talk) 13:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[20200212] On the revision 940218724

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Requiring citations to sources is the methoid we use to make content verifiable; without a requirement for sources anyone can post anything they like, including stuff which is either highly questionable or simply wrong. JBW (talk) 14:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW:

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Requiring citations to sources is the methoid we use to make content verifiable...
— User:JBW 14:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

"Blindly following rules without consideration eventually becomes dogmatism." More

...without a requirement for sources anyone can post anything they like, including stuff which is either highly questionable or simply wrong.
— User:JBW 14:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Whatever fails the challenge cannot survive.

— Wikipedian Right (talk) 15:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. HLHJ (talk) 19:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HLHJ:

It was never about the debate, it is always about the truth.

An encyclopedia that's open, free, anyone can edit: a dream place for anyone to freely exchange whose knowledge. Don't you agree?

— Wikipedian Right (talk) 03:45, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]