User talk:WikipedianRam

Welcome to my talk page

November 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Rudolph E. Tanzi—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WikipedianRam. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Nabin luhagun, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WikipedianRam. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WikipedianRam|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Usedtobecool. Hope you're doing well and I clearly want to say you that I am not any paid editor or I got any payment for my edit. I just contribute to the Wikipedia as a Wikipedian.Thank you. WikipedianRam (talk) 09:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have some connection with the subject. You are required to disclose it, even if it is not a paid relationship. And regardless, don't use fake references ever again. You may fool some of the people some of the time; you won't fool all of the people all of the time. Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding future film projects

Hello @WikipedianRam. I am @Archer1234. I noticed your recent edit to Yash (actor) where you added a row to the filmography table to add the upcoming film Toxic.

Wikipedia's guidance in WP:FILMOGRAPHY says do not add future film projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source.

Would you remove the entry for Toxic from the filmography table? Note that the information about Toxic could go in the "Career" section as part of the prose text.

If you have any questions, let me know, or you can ask at the WP:Help desk or the WP:Teahouse, where experienced editors are available to answer questions and provide guiance. Thank you. — Archer (t·c) 14:50, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again @WikipedianRam. I see that you added a reference to the entry for Toxic at Yash (actor). I see nothing in that source that says that filming has begun. If I have missed it, please point it out. Note that releasing a "title poster" or "first look" poster is not evidence of filming (principal photography) having begun. — Archer (t·c) 03:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Archer1234and thank you for your kind information and guidance. I will remove Toxic from the film list of actor Yash and sift to Career section. Thank you. WikipedianRam (talk) 03:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Happy editing. — Archer (t·c) 03:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nabin luhagun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nabin luhagun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabin luhagun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 07:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 13:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]