User talk:Wikipedia Engine

December 2015

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Dora the Explorer episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. SummerPhD^v2.0 07:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Dora the Explorer episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please discuss the issue. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anton Srholec

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anton Srholec, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 20:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Wikipedia Engine", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it implies that you have some privileged position with Wikipedia rather than being a normal user. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Dora the Explorer episodes. You have been asked repeatedly to source or explain your changes. You have continued to make changes to various dates without explaining or sourcing the changes. If you do so again, you will be blocked from editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 18:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage of Google Street View

Please do not add content that is of speculation such as this edit to the talk page. The talk page is meant for discussion of any content related to the page, not a list showing future events. Please read the policy on Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines and WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL. Ssbbplayer (talk) 01:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 10:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As your only purpose for editing Wikipedia seems to be to add fake material and speculation, I've blocked the account. Nick-D (talk) 10:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock-me (Request 1)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikipedia Engine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I not vandalize Wikipedia, and usually do own edits. Wikipedia Engine (talk) 11:03, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Making stuff up is vandalism.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock-me (Request 2)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikipedia Engine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise I will never vandalize, please change expire time of my block from infinite to 1 day (24 hours). Wikipedia Engine (talk) 12:36, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.