User talk:Wikipediæ philosophia/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Welcome!

Hi Dr Salvus! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Gricehead (talk) 09:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Sourcing at 2020–21 Coupe de France

Hi - thanks for your edits at 2020–21 Coupe de France and associated articles. However, the seventh round results and scorers you have added are not sourced. All information added to wikipedia should be verifiable by inline reliable sources. Please see WP:RS. If you can add sources, please do so, otherwise someone might come along and remove the information. Thanks, Gricehead (talk) 09:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Premise

Hi, I am Italian and therefore I am not am not a native English speaker and therefore I may also make some grammatical errors. So don't be angry with me if there are any mistakes Dr Salvus (talk) 09:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 09:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Primary sources

Hi again. I reverted your use of FFF match pages because they are from a WP:Primary source, and they also do not support the information included in the article. You need to find an independent, reliable secondary source that supports the information such as goalscorers which you have added to the matches. Regards, Gricehead (talk) 11:57, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Pi (first 100000 digits) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pi (first 100000 digits) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pi (first 100000 digits) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 10:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Supercoppa Italiana (women) 2020

Hello, Dr Salvus,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Supercoppa Italiana (women) 2020 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 00:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

List of Copa del Rey finals moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Copa del Rey finals, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 23:06, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

List of Copa del Rey finals

You have requested help on the above page right. I would like to help but would only be able to work on it next weekend,(not this). Sorry. KAS^(talk) 21:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Don't worry. Cheers Dr Salvus (talk) 21:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 21:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion of Supercoppa Italiana (women) 2020

The article Supercoppa Italiana (women) 2020 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Recommend you add some sources for this page. Otherwise it will not survive review. OswaldClara (talk) 15:18, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

I add a data source, please do not cancel the page Dr Salvus (talk) 16:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 16:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

• I have expanded article a little bit for now, but would require further expansion. KAS^(talk) 21:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Supercoppa Italiana (women), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CET. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

FC Vaulx-en-Velin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FC Vaulx-en-Velin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Notify a page creator

Hi Dr Salvus, try notifying the creator of an article before nominating an article for deletion like you did on this article. Josedimaria237 (talk) 11:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of S.S.D. Pro Sesto

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on S.S.D. Pro Sesto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Luciapop (talk) 10:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

@Luciapop please could you delete this page? Dr Salvus (talk) 10:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 10:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

1904–05 F.B.C. Juventus season moved to draftspace - unreferenced

An article you recently created, 1904–05 F.B.C. Juventus season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

@John B123 Are not reports of each match references? Dr Salvus (talk) 21:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 21:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Max Mayer (footballer)

Hello, Dr Salvus,

Thank you for creating Max Mayer (footballer).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

While the references mention the clubs, none of them mention the player by name. To establish notability the player needs to be mentioned in a reliable 3rd party source. Thank you

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 15:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

@Joseywales1961:. I copied from it.wiki Dr Salvus (talk) 16:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 16:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

You'll be a great rollback. Isapvito (talk) 19:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

@Isapvito thank you! Unfortunatley I am not a rollbacker Dr Salvus (talk) 19:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 19:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Samuel Iling Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samuel Iling Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Iling Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 20:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Instead of deleting the page, we can move into the draft space Dr Salvus (talk) 20:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 20:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

2019–20 Coppa Italia Serie C Group D moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019–20 Coppa Italia Serie C Group D, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sofia Del Baldo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sofia Del Baldo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

@CommanderWaterford is it possible move the page in the draftspace. I believe there is material to extend the page, but I have to look for it.

Milestones

Greetings! I saw this edit of yours in which you referred to becoming a rollbacker as a "milestone". I wanted to offer you some hopefully helpful advice. Please understand that Wikipedia:User access levels are not "milestones". They are not privileges granted to editors here for their achievements. Such access levels are simply tools given to editors on the project who have a demonstrated need and experience base on which to use such tools. Last month I became an administrator. But, before that I operated without any user access levels. I was able to contribute to the project quite well without rollbacker or any other privilege. I would encourage you to think of the access levels as tools where it has become obvious that you need them and have the experience to use them appropriately. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Hammersoft: AGF, I would think it's probably a language thing. English is not Dr Salvus's first language. Gricehead (talk) 18:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

• I am. It's just intended as helpful advice, as I noted. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Aggiornamenti in diretta

Ciao! Una cosa: non bisogna mai fare aggiornamenti di statistiche mentre la partita sta ancora andando avanti. Gli aggiornamenti si fanno a fine partita. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 17:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok grazie non lo sapevo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Salvus (talk • contribs) 17:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Nel caso Federico Chiesa non segnasse un'altro gol, per aggiornare la pagina annulleremo dunque la modifica a fine partita? Dr Salvus (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Ho gia' riportato la pagina alla versione precedente. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 18:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Manzano and Carbonia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Matteo Anzolin

Ciao, sfortunatamente Anzolin non ha ancora giocato una partita per la Juve U23. Leggi WP:NFOOTY: deve fare una presenza in un campionato professionistico (vedi Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues), o per una nazionale maggiore. Ti consiglio di spostare la pagina a Draft, finche' non fa il suo esordio. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 21:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done Dr Salvus (talk) 21:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 21:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

You're invited! Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE - February 6th, 2021 -

February 6th, 11am-1pm E.S.T: Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE

Hello User:Dr Salvus! You are invited to join the Brooklyn based Sure We Can community for our 3rd NYC COVID-19 themed Wikipedia Edit-a-thon / translate-a-thon - ONLINE - Saturday, Feb 6th, 2021 11am - 1pm. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with NYC Health + Hospitals to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to continue to work on translating the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into the many languages spoken in New York City; as well as, work on other ideas about how information on wikipedia could slow the spread of Covid-19. We'd love to hear if you have any ideas. If you can not attend, please feel free to comment on my talk page, or here, or on the event page. Saturday February 6 Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE (optional RSVP on-wiki). 11:00am - 1:00 pm E.S.T online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms available)

--Wil540 art (talk) 21:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

@Wil540 art: Thanks for the invitation but I would prefer not to participate Dr Salvus (talk) 21:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 21:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

2020–21 Juventus F.C. seasons and Draft:2019–20 Coppa Italia Serie C

Hi, thanks for your work at 2020–21 Juventus F.C. (women) season and 2020–21 Juventus F.C. (women) season, much appreciated! Just a quick note: can you please also update the player statistics in the "Player details" section after each match (making sure to distinguish between starter and sub)? Thanks, Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 16:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

OK it will be done Dr Salvus (talk) 16:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 16:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks :) Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 16:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Could you help me to extend the page Draft:2019–20 Coppa Italia Serie C? Dr Salvus (talk) 16:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 16:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

I've taken care of everything until Group A. Can you finish all the other groups? After you're done with Group M let me know, and I'll start formatting the knock-out stage. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 17:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks :) Dr Salvus (talk) 17:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 17:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Puoi formattare la fase ad eliminazione diretta, ho completato tutte le schede su tutti i gironi. Dr Salvus (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Avevo l'intenzione di mettere l'"albero" della fase ad eliminazione diretta, ma risulta molto complesso (perche' tutte le fasi sono a gara secca, tranne le semifinali, e non so esattamente come formattare la cosa). Per ora metterei le partite e basta, poi magari nel futuro la riguardiamo con piu' calma. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 23:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Ho finito la pagina e l'ho spostata dalla draftspace alla mainspace, ti ringrazio per il tuo aiuto Dr Salvus (talk) 15:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 15:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Grandissimo lavoro, bravo! Un giorno quando avro' tempo mi mettero' ad aggiungere i link ai calciatori senza link. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 17:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Alcuni sono senza link perché ho preso le informazioni da it.wiki e alcuni calciatori erano senza link Dr Salvus (talk) 18:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 18:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Qui sull'en.wiki e' preferibile mettere un link rosso piuttosto che non mettere link. Questo e' perche', nel caso il calciatore dovessere essere creato nel futuro, sarebbe gia' linkato nella competizione. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 19:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Un'altra cosa: ho notato che la tua firma e' un po'... strana. Nel senso che e' "Dr Salvus (talk) 18:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 18:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)", quando dovrebbe essere "Dr Salvus (talk) 18:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)". Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 19:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Purtroppo non sono capace di risolvere questo problema Dr Salvus (talk) 19:30, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 19:30, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Vai in alto su "Preferences", scendi giu' e dovresti trovare la sezione "Signature". Li', cambi il codice in questo:

[[User:Dr Salvus|Dr Salvus]] ([[User talk:Dr Salvus|talk]])

Fai attenzione a tenere la spunta che dice "Treat the above as wiki markup".

Un'altra cosa: cerca sempre di indentare quando stai parlando in una talk page. Nota come metto sempre i : all'inizio dei miei paragrafi :) Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 19:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Grazie mille Dr Salvus (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Giusto per capire, tu come firmi? Alla fine della frase bisogna mettere 4 ~. Quindi, ad esempio:

Ciao. ~~~~

Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 20:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Io firmo con le 4 tilde Dr Salvus (talk) 20:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 20:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Prova a risistemare su Preferences, e ricordati di salvare le modifiche in basso. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 20:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

@Nehme1499 mi sto mettendo al lavoro per aggiungere i marcatori alla pagina 2019–20 Coppa Italia Serie C

Perfetto :) Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 20:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Regional Cups moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Regional Cups, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 13:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Signature

I'm guessing you didn't see the responses to your help desk question about your broken sig. I wrote:

Assuming you're just typing ~~~~ at the end of your message (and not ~~~~Dr Salvus~~~~) to cause this, you should reset your signature at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-personal by removing anything in the "Signature" field, un-checking the "Treat the above as wiki markup" checkbox below it, and the clicking the "Save" button. Thanks. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 03:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Milestone

A milestone is literally a marker of distance along roads, but it is also used to convey developmental progress, for example in the education of children, reading or math skills; also in terms of status of complex projects, Proof of concept. The use of 'milestone' in a sentence conveys a progression from one stage to the next. David notMD (talk) 10:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2021–22 Coupe de France

A tag has been placed on Category:2021–22 Coupe de France requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 Coupe de France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clairefontaine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Fixed (Clairefontaine → Clairefontaine-en-Yvelines) Gricehead (talk) 08:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Apulia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Apulia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

JohnB123 i add the source. Is It enough For move the Page in the mainspace? Dr Salvus (talk) 18:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: correct ping. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

I've split the ref over the four sections so that each point to the correct tab in the source and moved back to mainspace. Regards --John B123 (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank's Dr Salvus (talk) 19:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of international goals scored by Sergio Ramos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international goals scored by Sergio Ramos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international goals scored by Sergio Ramos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr Salvus -- Dr Salvus (talk) 20:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

@Legobot: In case this article is promoted to Good Article, could you give me some advice to even nominate it to Featured List? Would you also give me some advice to make the following pages Featured List: Overseas teams in the main competition of the Coupe de France and List of Coppa Italia finals. Dr Salvus (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Legobot is a bot- you appear to have marked yourself as the reviewer for this. Also, please read Wikipedia:Good article criteria carefully- in particular, stand alone list articles are not eligible to be a good article. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain

The article List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr Salvus -- Dr Salvus (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

GA & FL

I've noticed you've nominated a few articles for GA & FL that don't seem to meet the requirements. Before attempting to nominate any more articles for GA and FL, please can you read the Wikipedia:Good article criteria (particularly the section on what cannot be a GA), and the Wikipedia:Featured list criteria. You may also like to look at examples of GAs and FLs on football topics, there is a list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football#Featured content of all football related GAs and FLs. In short, list articles cannot be GAs- they can only reach FL- and articles with only a small amount of text content (excluding the tables) will not be considered to have broad and comprehensive coverage, and so will fail GA or FL. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your recent edits are indeed concerning. Creating an article which (based on current consensus at the ongoing AFD discussion) is going to be deleted and immediately submitting it to GAN/FLC shows you fail to understand both notability requirements and article content requirements. Please note that competency is required and if you do not slow down and start listening to and speaking with other editors about your conduct, you will no doubt end up under some kind of restriction shortly. GiantSnowman 11:20, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Apulia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Apulia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Apulia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Joseph2302 (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Friuli Venezia Giulia

The article 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Friuli Venezia Giulia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per arguments presented in this discussion for a regional cup at the same level; fails WP:GNG and WP:IINFO; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Sardinia

The article 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Sardinia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per arguments presented in this discussion for a regional cup at the same level; fails WP:GNG and WP:IINFO; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Marche

The article 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Marche has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per arguments presented in this discussion for a regional cup at the same level; fails WP:GNG and WP:IINFO; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Sicily

The article 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Sicily has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per arguments presented in this discussion for a regional cup at the same level; fails WP:GNG and WP:IINFO; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Geometry Dash levels for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Geometry Dash levels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Geometry Dash levels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

List of Geometry Dash levels

Hi there, I saw that you submitted this at WP:GAN, for consideration as a good article. Please be aware that list articles do not qualify for good articles. You can try WP:FLC for featured lists but please be aware that the sourcing is way below the standard required. Please also note WP:RS and that other wikis are not considered to be reliable sources and should never be used as a reference. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Dr Salvus I'm pretty sure I couldn't have been clearer yesterday, but I'll repeat myself: lists cannot be good articles. This is another warning: please read Wikipedia:Good article criteria and Wikipedia:Featured list criteria properly before nominating anything else to GA or FL. And look at similar articles that have passed GA or FL. All of your nominations have been way short of reaching what is a very high standard for articles. If you keep nominating articles incorrectly, people will get fed up, and you'll get yourself into trouble- either blocked or topic banned from creating GA nominations. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Re: A goat for you!

Hello. What does it mean? Why am I a great? For what?--Island92 (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

@Island92: You are great because you always manage to improve pages that are already of high quality. Tell me your secret to can you do this? Dr Salvus (talk) 22:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

There isn't a particular secret. It might be the time. The more I practise, the pages will appear better. I'm just used to doing these kinds of edits.--Island92 (talk) 22:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Your rollback request

Although I’m not an admin, I saw your request for rollback. Per JJMC89, you have no anti-vandalism experience, and most of your reverts were either bad ones or reverting your own ones. For rollback, you need to make good reverts. Please read Wikipedia:Rollback for more info. Regards, -Cupper52^Discuss! 10:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

All My Children

Hey, I wanted to just let you know that the reason that I removed a large section from the AMC Page was because I am merging all the sections together. I am not vandalising! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 14:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Forgive me! I will be wrong, you can also undo my undo. Dr Salvus (talk) 14:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

No worries at all! 😊 I just wanted to let you know. I am going to be working on that page all day DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 14:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Mike Patton quote removal edit

hello! I made a perfectly reasonable & justified edit, with a good explanation, and you rolled it back instantly- perhaps without even reading the note. please be more careful & make sure to read the edit description - not all IP address edits are vandalism! thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.192.24 (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Forgive me. I would like to be a rollbacker and I have to gain experience to become one. Consequently I have to make mistakes to gain experience. It won't be the first or the last time, but I don't want to vandalize. Dr Salvus (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at 2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Apulia. You may not remove ACTIVE afd notices when a discussion is taking place. CUPIDICAE💕 17:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

@Praxidicae:Hi. Sorry I made a little confusion with myself. I didn't want to vandalize. Please delete the page Draft:2019-20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Apulia created by mistake today to move after the page 2019-20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Apulia to draftspace (page created on 9 February 2020). Dr Salvus (talk) 17:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

I would like to apologize for being wrong. Dr Salvus (talk) 17:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

I promise not to do it again Dr Salvus (talk) 17:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Coppa Italia trophy

A tag has been placed on File:Coppa Italia trophy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

RunningTiger123 I think I was perhaps a little distracted... I'm very sorry. I apologize. You can delete the page. I made an error in good faith. I do not do it again. Sorry. I apologize. You can delete the page. I made an error in good faith. I do not do it again. But I read that GettyImages's photos are legal...

I think the block is excessive because I have always made edits in good faith and remember that: "Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum" Dr Salvus (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

To explain: One copyright violation does not lead to a ban (generally speaking), but doing it again may lead to a ban. Copyright violations are no laughing matter, so Wikipedia has to be strict about it. Please learn from this and do not do it again. RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Next time I promise of be more careful in these things. Unfortunately, I'm not very experienced in these things. Next time I will ask in the Help Desk. Dr Salvus (talk) 21:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

2021–22 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds, Overseas departments and territories moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2021–22 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds, Overseas departments and territories, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

@CommanderWaterford: there is a source. Do you see it? In case that is not enough then we wait for the matches of the Mayotte regional qualifiers keeping the article in draftspace. Dr Salvus (talk) 14:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) There is no independent, secondary source (the source you have used is a primary source, in that it is published by the Mayotte Football League, who organise the competition). I suggest reading WP:IS and WP:RSPRIMARY. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

@Gricehead For now there are no secondary sources. Surely over time the first secondary sources will begin to exist. It seems fair to me to keep the page at least in the draft space so that secondary sources do not come out. Since you know French football better than I do, could you help me find secondary sources? Dr Salvus (talk) 15:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

There aren't any secondary sources yet. Which is why I haven't created the article yet. Keep it in draft space until there are sources after 20th. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

@Gricehead: So sorry for having anticipated the creation of the article. Seriously, why do you think secondary sources could arrive on February 20th? Regards Dr Salvus (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Experience tells me sources will become available. That and there's no deadline. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

@Gricehead: Today is February 20th but I haven't found any information, did you find any? Dr Salvus (talk) 15:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

No. Having re-read the reference you provided from the Mayotte League, the calendar which it contained was provisional. I strongly doubt that any games have taken place, nor a draw even been made yet. Also, please re-read WP:NORUSH, as it seems you're still striving to get wikipedia updated in a hurry, and there is no deadline here. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 17:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

To follow up on this, Mayotte is still under COVID curfew and no football is taking place (under France's rules that only the professional divisions can currently play. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:People positive to COVID-19 has been nominated for deletion

Category:People positive to COVID-19 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Categories without categories

Non creare categorie come Category:People positive to COVID-19 senza che essa stessa sia categorizzata. La stessa cosa vale per pagine normali: devono sempre avere categorie. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

@Nehme1499: Spiegati meglio Dr Salvus (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:People positive to COVID-19 non ha categorie. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

@Nehme1499: Ora la pagina ha categorie. Dr Salvus (talk) 14:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

In ogni caso non sono convinto che la categoria debba esserci. Ci sono probabilmente centinaia di migliaia (se non milioni) di persone con una pagina su Wikipedia che hanno contratto il COVID-19. Secondo me non e' una categoria necessaria. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

@Nehme1499: Se pensi che non sia necessaria allora puoi proporre la sua cancellazione Dr Salvus (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

@Nehme1499: Seguendo il tuo ragionamento si dovrebbe anche cancellare la categoria Category:Living People Dr Salvus (talk) 14:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

No perche' e' importante per WP:BLP. Comunque, se vuoi linkare una categoria in una pagina di discussione, metti [[:Category, non [[Category: Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2021–22 UEFA Champions League into 2022–23 UEFA Champions League. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 UEFA Futsal Champions League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Borja, Edson and Everton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Infobox timestamps

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 20:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry I made a big mistake in good faith Dr Salvus (talk) 20:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Again, at Mickaël Le Bihan. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Reference Email - Huggle

I use version 3.4.10 with windows 10, for huggle to work properly you need the Rollback rights which you may be eligible for depending on your previous anti-vandalism history being good, might I suggest that you enrol at the Counter-Vandalism Acadamy to gain some experience - I did this last year and found it to be a great experience, the tutor was an exceptional help to me. Best wishes JW 1961 Talk 23:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Overseas teams in the Round of 64 of the Coupe de France since 2015 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Overseas teams in the Round of 64 of the Coupe de France since 2015 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Overseas teams in the Round of 64 of the Coupe de France since 2015 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:44, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:UBX/Male chauvinist

Template:UBX/Male chauvinist, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:UBX/Male chauvinist and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:UBX/Male chauvinist during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:47, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Italy women's national football team results (2020–present) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Italy women's national football team results (2020–present), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 00:42, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: There are not need sources. See Italy national football team results (2010–present). There are not sources. Dr Salvus (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Of course sources are need - see WP:UNSOURCED. --John B123 (talk) 16:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: I add the source Dr Salvus (talk) 14:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

GAN of Cemetery of San Fernando

Hi Dr Salvus, in February you posted at Talk:Cemetery of San Fernando/GA1 that you supported promoting Cemetery of San Fernando to good article status. For good articles, only one reviewer is required to approve an article's nomination, provided that the articles fulfils the good article criteria. Reviewers should follow the instructions at WP:GAREVIEW while conducting their assessment. Will you be reviewing this article, or can another editor review it? Z1720 (talk) 01:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

It doesn't look like this user is going to do that GA, I doubt they've read WP:GAREVIEW properly. I would say that any other uninvolved ediotr should take up that GA review. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Joseph2302 (talk) 13:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Escalated warning

Dr Salvus, on the basis of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:UBX/Male chauvinist and the inappropriate edit to Nikkimaria user page (diff) alone, you face imminent sanctions for WP:CIR problems of a provocational nature. You must slow down. Continuing to engage in advanced processes and/or userpage cruft is almost certain to end up badly, because you clearly lack the competence to do so at this time. There are 6 million articles on the project that are not GA/FA/userpages, so, best to focus on contributing there, cautiously, because you've used up pretty much all the goodwill that is extended to newcomers. Thank you in advance for your attention. 14:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

I apologize. But remember that I don't vandalize. Dr_Salvus (talk) 14:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Dr Salvus, okay, but you should remember that WP:VAND is far from the only WP:DE parameter, and that it was never invoked, by anyone at any time, I'm pretty sure (certainly not by me). El_C 14:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

@El C: But I would like to understand why there is a controversy about me? It looks like I'm a vandal but I'm not. I fell into depression because of this controversy. I don't want do distruptive edits. Dr_Salvus (talk) 14:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Again, the matter concerns competence (WP:CIR). No need to feel distressed. So long as you're able to follow my recommendations, things are likely to work out fine. All that other stuff will be forgotten, eventually, as just some growing pains. No malice on your part has been inferred, by anyone at any time, I'm pretty sure (certainly not by me). ←See what I did there? El_C 15:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

List of Coppa Italia finals FL

Seriously, withdrawing the featured list candidate, and then re-nominating it a few days later- as you have now down twice- it not helpful or constructive. It gives the impression that you're trying to hide the comments from the last review, without necessarily addressing them. Why couldn't you have just left the old review open, rather than "withdrawing" it and then creating a new one. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

@Joseph2302: I withdrawn the candidate and then re-nominating the page because I thought to have immediately resolved the problems that prevented the page from being named an FL. Dr_Salvus (talk) 18:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Giorgio Marchetti

Hello, Dr Salvus,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Giorgio Marchetti, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Saint-Colomban Sportive Locminé

Hi, thanks for your contribution with translating this article from the French wikipedia. Please note that it is a wikipedia license requirement to attribute the foreign language wiki which you translate from. See Help:Translation#License requirements for details. Thanks, Gricehead (talk) 15:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Italy women's national football team results (2020–present) (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kashmorwiki was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Italy women's national football team results (2020–present) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Italy women's national football team results (2020–present), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 07:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Dr Salvus! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kichu🐘 Need any help? 07:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Following WP procedures

Dr Salvus. I see you are getting many messages about following procedures here on English WP, and I hope you will try to understand them, take them to heart, and slow down so that you can comply.

My current example is your apparent wish to request a 2nd peer review (PR) for List of Coppa Italia finals. There is a process for that, clearly described at WP:PR/Instructions, but you did not follow those steps. Instead, you manually changed the {{Peer review}} template on the list's Talk page (reverted by me), and then manually created Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Coppa Italia finals/archive2. You should know two things about that page:

1. Nobody will ever notice it, because you created it out of the regular process. The people who do peer reviews will never discover its existence.
2. I have nominated it for speedy deletion on the grounds that it was an error and does nobody any good.

I hope you can find a mentor to help you in your work here, and that you will pay closer attention to the procedural directions offered on English Wikipedia. I wonder why you don't focus more on Italian Wikipedia, where perhaps there's not so much of a language barrier. In any case, good luck, — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 20:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

And I have just now reverted your continued attempts to circumvent the established PR procedures. Please read the above and adjust your actions accordingly. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 21:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Why do you want to cancel the peer review? I want the page to be an FL. If you think he got it wrong then fix the page. I can't fix it now because I'm using my cell pho Dr_Salvus (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)ne

I don't want to "cancel" any peer review. If you want to request a peer review, then I ask you to do it correctly. That's all. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

And again: I have reverted your manual change to the Talk page and tagged your manually created "review" page (which isn't one) for deletion. Did you follow the WP:PR/Instructions? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 08:34, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Because you deleted John's CSD out of process and have repeatedly re-created that page despite guidance, I will block you from that page the next time you re-create it. Please stop and listen to the advice from many editors who are trying to help you. StarM 21:57, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: Unfortunatley I'm not a native speaker of English. I don't always understand what exactly I have to do. Believe me, I absolutely didn't want to vandalize. I thought I did the right thing Dr_Salvus (talk) 22:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Not worry, you didn't vandalize, but there are a variety of reasons not to re=create pages, which @JohnFromPinckney: laid out above as they relate to this particular process. I have no doubt that you mean well, I do recommend that you take several steps back and learn about the different processes and what they involve. We all had to learn, native speakers or not. StarM 01:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: Can you explain better what I shouldn't have done? Dr_Salvus (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

JOhn explained the process for creating a peer review, which you repeatedly did not follow. I understand you wanted a peer review for your article (no comment on merits), but there is a Wikipedia process which JohnFromPinckney linked you to and instead you just did it your own way again. That's not vandalism, but it is disruptive editing. StarM 14:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: How did I forget that I had the article Overseas teams in the main competition of the Coupe de France is in peer rewiev and therefore two peer reviews cannot be held by the same nominator? I think I will focus only on the article List of Coppa Italia finals and when the article is named an FL I will focus on the article Overseas teams in the main competition of the Coupe de France. I will therefore withdraw my candidacy on the article just mentioned Dr_Salvus (talk) 14:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jessica Tozzi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Tozzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Tozzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PK650 (talk) 22:49, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dr Salvus

Thank you for creating 2018–19 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds, Hauts-de France.

User:Joseywales1961, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Can you check reference 4 for error please.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 15:30, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

@Joseywales1961: Thank you for report to me this problem. Dr_Salvus (talk) 18:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Infobox timestamps

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 20:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry I made a big mistake in good faith Dr Salvus (talk) 20:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Again, at Mickaël Le Bihan. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Reference Email - Huggle

I use version 3.4.10 with windows 10, for huggle to work properly you need the Rollback rights which you may be eligible for depending on your previous anti-vandalism history being good, might I suggest that you enrol at the Counter-Vandalism Acadamy to gain some experience - I did this last year and found it to be a great experience, the tutor was an exceptional help to me. Best wishes JW 1961 Talk 23:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Overseas teams in the Round of 64 of the Coupe de France since 2015 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Overseas teams in the Round of 64 of the Coupe de France since 2015 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Overseas teams in the Round of 64 of the Coupe de France since 2015 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:44, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:UBX/Male chauvinist

Template:UBX/Male chauvinist, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:UBX/Male chauvinist and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:UBX/Male chauvinist during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:47, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Italy women's national football team results (2020–present) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Italy women's national football team results (2020–present), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 00:42, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: There are not need sources. See Italy national football team results (2010–present). There are not sources. Dr Salvus (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Of course sources are need - see WP:UNSOURCED. --John B123 (talk) 16:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: I add the source Dr Salvus (talk) 14:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

GAN of Cemetery of San Fernando

Hi Dr Salvus, in February you posted at Talk:Cemetery of San Fernando/GA1 that you supported promoting Cemetery of San Fernando to good article status. For good articles, only one reviewer is required to approve an article's nomination, provided that the articles fulfils the good article criteria. Reviewers should follow the instructions at WP:GAREVIEW while conducting their assessment. Will you be reviewing this article, or can another editor review it? Z1720 (talk) 01:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

It doesn't look like this user is going to do that GA, I doubt they've read WP:GAREVIEW properly. I would say that any other uninvolved ediotr should take up that GA review. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Joseph2302 (talk) 13:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Escalated warning

Dr Salvus, on the basis of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:UBX/Male chauvinist and the inappropriate edit to Nikkimaria user page (diff) alone, you face imminent sanctions for WP:CIR problems of a provocational nature. You must slow down. Continuing to engage in advanced processes and/or userpage cruft is almost certain to end up badly, because you clearly lack the competence to do so at this time. There are 6 million articles on the project that are not GA/FA/userpages, so, best to focus on contributing there, cautiously, because you've used up pretty much all the goodwill that is extended to newcomers. Thank you in advance for your attention. 14:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

I apologize. But remember that I don't vandalize. Dr_Salvus (talk) 14:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Dr Salvus, okay, but you should remember that WP:VAND is far from the only WP:DE parameter, and that it was never invoked, by anyone at any time, I'm pretty sure (certainly not by me). El_C 14:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

@El C: But I would like to understand why there is a controversy about me? It looks like I'm a vandal but I'm not. I fell into depression because of this controversy. I don't want do distruptive edits. Dr_Salvus (talk) 14:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Again, the matter concerns competence (WP:CIR). No need to feel distressed. So long as you're able to follow my recommendations, things are likely to work out fine. All that other stuff will be forgotten, eventually, as just some growing pains. No malice on your part has been inferred, by anyone at any time, I'm pretty sure (certainly not by me). ←See what I did there? El_C 15:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

List of Coppa Italia finals FL

Seriously, withdrawing the featured list candidate, and then re-nominating it a few days later- as you have now down twice- it not helpful or constructive. It gives the impression that you're trying to hide the comments from the last review, without necessarily addressing them. Why couldn't you have just left the old review open, rather than "withdrawing" it and then creating a new one. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

@Joseph2302: I withdrawn the candidate and then re-nominating the page because I thought to have immediately resolved the problems that prevented the page from being named an FL. Dr_Salvus (talk) 18:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Giorgio Marchetti

Hello, Dr Salvus,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Giorgio Marchetti, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Saint-Colomban Sportive Locminé

Hi, thanks for your contribution with translating this article from the French wikipedia. Please note that it is a wikipedia license requirement to attribute the foreign language wiki which you translate from. See Help:Translation#License requirements for details. Thanks, Gricehead (talk) 15:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Italy women's national football team results (2020–present) (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kashmorwiki was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Italy women's national football team results (2020–present) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Italy women's national football team results (2020–present), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 07:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Dr Salvus! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kichu🐘 Need any help? 07:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Following WP procedures

Dr Salvus. I see you are getting many messages about following procedures here on English WP, and I hope you will try to understand them, take them to heart, and slow down so that you can comply.

My current example is your apparent wish to request a 2nd peer review (PR) for List of Coppa Italia finals. There is a process for that, clearly described at WP:PR/Instructions, but you did not follow those steps. Instead, you manually changed the {{Peer review}} template on the list's Talk page (reverted by me), and then manually created Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Coppa Italia finals/archive2. You should know two things about that page:

1. Nobody will ever notice it, because you created it out of the regular process. The people who do peer reviews will never discover its existence.
2. I have nominated it for speedy deletion on the grounds that it was an error and does nobody any good.

I hope you can find a mentor to help you in your work here, and that you will pay closer attention to the procedural directions offered on English Wikipedia. I wonder why you don't focus more on Italian Wikipedia, where perhaps there's not so much of a language barrier. In any case, good luck, — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 20:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

And I have just now reverted your continued attempts to circumvent the established PR procedures. Please read the above and adjust your actions accordingly. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 21:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Why do you want to cancel the peer review? I want the page to be an FL. If you think he got it wrong then fix the page. I can't fix it now because I'm using my cell pho Dr_Salvus (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)ne

I don't want to "cancel" any peer review. If you want to request a peer review, then I ask you to do it correctly. That's all. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

And again: I have reverted your manual change to the Talk page and tagged your manually created "review" page (which isn't one) for deletion. Did you follow the WP:PR/Instructions? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 08:34, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Because you deleted John's CSD out of process and have repeatedly re-created that page despite guidance, I will block you from that page the next time you re-create it. Please stop and listen to the advice from many editors who are trying to help you. StarM 21:57, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: Unfortunatley I'm not a native speaker of English. I don't always understand what exactly I have to do. Believe me, I absolutely didn't want to vandalize. I thought I did the right thing Dr_Salvus (talk) 22:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Not worry, you didn't vandalize, but there are a variety of reasons not to re=create pages, which @JohnFromPinckney: laid out above as they relate to this particular process. I have no doubt that you mean well, I do recommend that you take several steps back and learn about the different processes and what they involve. We all had to learn, native speakers or not. StarM 01:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: Can you explain better what I shouldn't have done? Dr_Salvus (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

JOhn explained the process for creating a peer review, which you repeatedly did not follow. I understand you wanted a peer review for your article (no comment on merits), but there is a Wikipedia process which JohnFromPinckney linked you to and instead you just did it your own way again. That's not vandalism, but it is disruptive editing. StarM 14:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: How did I forget that I had the article Overseas teams in the main competition of the Coupe de France is in peer rewiev and therefore two peer reviews cannot be held by the same nominator? I think I will focus only on the article List of Coppa Italia finals and when the article is named an FL I will focus on the article Overseas teams in the main competition of the Coupe de France. I will therefore withdraw my candidacy on the article just mentioned Dr_Salvus (talk) 14:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jessica Tozzi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Tozzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Tozzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PK650 (talk) 22:49, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dr Salvus

Thank you for creating 2018–19 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds, Hauts-de France.

User:Joseywales1961, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Can you check reference 4 for error please.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 15:30, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

@Joseywales1961: Thank you for report to me this problem. Dr_Salvus (talk) 18:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)