User talk:Wikihow6754

April 2020

Your recent edits to Charlie Puth could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 02:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Legends Never Die (Juice Wrld album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:45, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your addition to Exeter Township Senior High School was undone because neither your addition nor the Taylor Bertolet article provide reliable references indicating Bertolet was a student there. Please also note that Wikipedia defines NFL players that played a regular season or post-season game, which does not apply to Bertolet. • Gene93k (talk) 20:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to George Floyd protests in North Carolina, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Ed talk! 19:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Stone Foltz moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Death of Stone Foltz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:35, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Stone Foltz

I just filled out the Death of Stone Foltz draft that you created. The original draft violated both WP:Verifiability and WP:BLPCRIME policies. The criminality of the incident is alleged, and Wikipedia cannot state it as a fact until a conviction is secured. Just as important, always cite reliable sources that support the content you contribute, especially when the subject is contentious. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve USDA Coalition of Minority Employees

Hello, Wikihow6754,

Thank you for creating USDA Coalition of Minority Employees.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this page. The sourcing for the article could be improved, for example citing the organisation itself is generally not a reliable way of demonstrating notability. There is significant reporting about this organisation in the media (from a quick search I found Washington Post, Politico and Mother Jones articles) and these should be included in the article so notability is more clearly demonstrated. Regards,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Goldsztajn (talk) 09:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric J. Barron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek life. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Donda (album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. AshMusique (talk) 06:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Death of Tim Piazza, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr.weedle (talk) 04:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Um

I'm sure you didn't mean that you, Wikihow6754, are attempting to alter public opinion in anticipation of a trial, did you?

Because that's what you said. DS (talk) 00:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning: BLP violations

Do not add unsourced or poorly-sourced information about living, recently deceased, or possibly deceased people anywhere on Wikipedia. That includes citing a tweet by someone accusing someone else of a crime, if that tweet has not been discussed in reliable sources. Further, per WP:BLPCRIME, do not refer to alleged crimes as having definitely happened.

You have done both of these recently at Death of Tim Piazza—using a tweet that was made only shortly before your edit, I will add, which is rather suspicious. You were warned for this before, last May. If you make edits like this again, I will block you from editing and/or impose sanctions under the following arbitration remedy:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 01:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 02:16, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only six edits after the above warning, you made this edit to add a contentious claim to a living person's article, citing a source that does not make that claim (nor does the underlying Reuters source). When reverted by Adavidb with an explanation of why your source was inadequate, you proceeded to no-summary revert him. All I can conclude from this is that you either don't understand how our biographies of living persons (BLP) policy works, or understand but don't care to follow it. If you choose to request an unblock, please explain in your request what you understand the rules to be regarding contentious claims about living persons. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 02:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the rules and request an unblock. I am not a Wikipedia Veteran like some, and I am willing to learn more about the process. The intention was not slander or maltreatment, and did not affect the outcome of an election. The redaction was created, and the page edited to mark universal Wikipedia code. In future editing here onto, Wikipedia rules will be more strictly followed. Wikihow6754 (talk) 16:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 17:54, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]