User talk:Wikicd24

Welcome!

Hi Wikicd24! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 18:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Wikicd24 (talk) 09:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikki cd user moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Agathokakological. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Draft accidentally created in main space. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:AKL Poster.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:AKL Poster.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 16:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Do not tag your edits like these as minor (m.). Go thorough WP:MINOR. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:AKL Poster.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:AKL Poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.justwatch.com/in/movie/agathokakological and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 18:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you do this? At least clarify things before you do anything like this. You don't even get it , the copyright violation you are claiming is a streaming platform which has copied the contents from IMDb site. https://www.justwatch.com/in/movie/agathokakological.. You'll find the same poster in different social media, that doesn't mean everyone has copyrights. By the way, I'm the producer of the movie and I have all the copyrights. Its my maiden venture and its disappointing to see such acts. Wikicd24 (talk) 05:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Wikicd24. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Agathokakological, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 07:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is not about me. Its information regarding a movie, that's it.

Please don't complicate things. And the poster is in the public domain. Wikicd24 (talk) 07:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is about you, unfortunately, because in this edit to Agathokakological, you wrote "This is the official poster and I as the producer of the film own the copyrights." In accordance with the Wikipedia policies I linked to above, you must immediately cease editing Agathokakological and any other articles connected with you and your work, and you must also immediately disclose your conflict of interest at User:Wikicd24. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 07:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whats wrong with you, when a pic was posted earlier, you got a link of a streaming platform and mentioned its already there and I don't have the copyrights. And that too for speedy deletion, you couldn't even research for the authenticity. That itself was wrong thing, its a poster in public domain and its available on IMDb. Search for things there. I believe you wont allow me to post anything at all, because you are not researching for facts and authenticity you are searching for reasons to delete. To a man with a shovel, everything looks like a nail. Wikicd24 (talk) 08:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to edit or create articles, so long as you stick to Wikipedia's policies, which have been agreed by consensus by many editors over a long period. Wikipedia:Conflict of interest is a long-standing Wikipedia policy, and so is Wikipedia:Copyrights. What I thought was a copyright problem has turned out to be a conflict of interest problem. Wikishovel (talk) 08:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had shared the message of deletion of the poster with the producers and I had copy pasted the message I received from them.

Also they had sent couple of new posters to be used. One which tried posting along with the message. That's the mistake I did.

As I've not done many edits, it led to this situation. If you want to clarify things, do visit the links provided in the references. Its the maiden venture of the production house and its disappointing for them to go through this situation. Kindly help. Wikicd24 (talk) 08:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for the disappointment, but as I said, the problem we have now is a conflict of interest. This will be taken into account when the draft article is reviewed, and I won't review it this time, as it was me that moved it to draft. You must now declare the conflict of interest at your user page. Please do this right now, thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 09:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well it says it'll take 3 months time "This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order'.

I'm feeling very bad for this.

Did you check this - https://www.justwatch.com/in/movie/agathokakological The one you thought were owing the copy rights of the poster.

"We try to add new providers constantly but we couldn't find an offer for "Agathokakological" online." - This is the message on the site. They don't even stream the movie.Its a pirated one.

And you wanted a speedy deletion. Don't you think you made a mistake?

If the poster was found in any official website I could understand, but you thought pirated site have the copy right.

Anyways please allow others sometime, don't be in a hurry to delete.

At least inform and let others respond.

I would suggest you should take time and also give others the time. Wikicd24 (talk) 09:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agathokakological moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Agathokakological. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 07:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agathokakological (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agathokakological and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikicd24! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agathokakological (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

mostly unreliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agathokakological and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 04:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]