User talk:Wikibajwa

Welcome!

Hi Wikibajwa! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Fragrant Peony (talk) 05:15, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changing spellings on 'Use British English' pages

Hi Wikibajwa, welcome to Wikipedia & thanks for your contributions. I noticed that some of your edits, such as those for the page Mick Aston, changed the spelling of words from British/Commonwealth English to US English. Please note that the convention on Wikipedia is to use the spelling variants appropriate for the subject of the article. In this case, Mick Aston was British, so British English spelling is used on that page. For more information, have a read of Wikipedia's Manual of Style section on that subject. Thanks again! Rusty Springs (talk) 05:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for guidance. I will take care about it from now. Wikibajwa (talk) 05:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting

Hi Wikibajwa. Thank you for your copyedits to archaeology biographies. However, I need to bring your attention to a few things:

As Rusty says above, please bear in mind that different varieties of English have different spells. In particular, British English generally uses -ise spellings. You should not switch from one English variety to another without a good reason.
A comma after an introductory phrase (e.g. From 1865 to 1880, he ...) is optional and most authorities recommend omitting it unless the clause is long or ambiguous. When copyediting articles that are otherwise well-written, and especially featured articles, it's probably best to defer to the style the original author(s) used.
You don't have to change one thing at a time. Making dozens of tiny edits to an article floods the watchlists of other users and makes it difficult for them to see and revise what you did. I would greatly appreciate it if you could combine your copyedits into one single edit.

Thanks for your understanding. – Joe (talk) 06:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're making a lot of work for yourself and others. Please desist. Seasider53 (talk) 07:20, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to be careful with linking. The Buckingham Street you linked to in the William Burges article is the street in Dublin, not the one in London where Burges actually lived and worked. KJP1 (talk) 07:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sincere apologies for all those mistakes I overlooked. I'll make sure I don't repeat such mistakes. Wikibajwa (talk) 07:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using "Preview" is always a good thing to do. Doug Weller talk 11:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Wikibajwa (talk) 04:10, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Abbasshaikh124 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbasshaikh124. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 17:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]