User talk:Wikiality123/Archive9
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Wikiality123. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
DYK for Henrique Henriques
Your Incomplete Action
Nice to know you alerted Admin who reads the mind. But you forgot to disclose that you are either a sock or meat putter of 'Ncm' BTW. Me and my friends who admire ದೊಡ್ಡವರು (respected the great Periyar) for his principles (though not recent misguided fanatic followers), like the wikipedia article. Looks like you have made some good contributions. 76.212.10.229 (talk) 04:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'm a sock of Ncm? Whatever that would mean. As I said earlier, if you want me to help Naadapriya let me know and am glad to do so. But I always believe that anyone who chose to be ridiculous can stuff themselves with what ever they want. I would strongly advice you not to piss off people who are trying to be friendly with you. It wasn't my botheration to go and alert sysops for this, but yet I did. I would have expected you to be a bit more civilized to appreciate the fact that I had not been ad hominem and worked with good faith. Ta Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 07:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- The actions show if not Sock for sure a Meat Puppet of 'Ncm'. None of us are here to lobby to take back a good editor who was blocked by using the 'cracks' in the system (implicit conspiracy). If the system is allowed to continue as is it can happen to any good editor say you. We are confident that someone in Wikipedia will fix the system. Most Admins who sided the unjustified blocking are already in trouble with many other editors, even leading to recalls. We are not sure if the blocked good editor will be back or not, but we believe our efforts will prevent such an injustice happening to another good editor such as you. BTW: We believe in Periyar statement 'the caste system has perverted peoples ideas about human conduct' similar to believing Kanakadaasa's saying 'ಕುಲ ಕುಲ ಕುಲವೆಂದು ಹೊಡೆದಾಡದಿರಿ ...' (do not fight for your caste which has no meaning) .76.212.10.229 (talk) 07:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- You probably talking about Ncmvocalist. I do not think we have any common interests and you will be only one to think so. So lets make a deal. You and Naadapriya are going to apologise for throwing stones at me and then afterwards (and only afterwards) I will come up with my proposal that I told ShefeildSteel long ago so as to help Naadapriya. Until you get back your words you can just go about on your own. Ta Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 08:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- The actions show if not Sock for sure a Meat Puppet of 'Ncm'. None of us are here to lobby to take back a good editor who was blocked by using the 'cracks' in the system (implicit conspiracy). If the system is allowed to continue as is it can happen to any good editor say you. We are confident that someone in Wikipedia will fix the system. Most Admins who sided the unjustified blocking are already in trouble with many other editors, even leading to recalls. We are not sure if the blocked good editor will be back or not, but we believe our efforts will prevent such an injustice happening to another good editor such as you. BTW: We believe in Periyar statement 'the caste system has perverted peoples ideas about human conduct' similar to believing Kanakadaasa's saying 'ಕುಲ ಕುಲ ಕುಲವೆಂದು ಹೊಡೆದಾಡದಿರಿ ...' (do not fight for your caste which has no meaning) .76.212.10.229 (talk) 07:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a platform to make deals among editors. It is on facts and issues. I wish you knew it. Arguments will continue based on objective evidence such as you sporadically endorsing a tag by 'Ncm' possibly in return to 'Ncm' sporadically supporting you on HK falls article who in turn got a sporadic support from Mspraveen in framing the ban. வணக்கம் for now. 76.212.10.229 (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- It is not deal among editors, but a deal to abide with certain conditions layed by the wiki community. Since your tone suggests me that you won't change for now. No Ncm or Ncmvocalist was on Hogenakkal falls article as far as I can recollect. You might want to check out the history yourself. You are theorising a wonderful story in your head. You probably want to get out of it and start facing realities. Once again, talk back only if you are ready to apologise for calling me a sock. You are not getting any help otherwise. Ciao Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 09:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a platform to make deals among editors. It is on facts and issues. I wish you knew it. Arguments will continue based on objective evidence such as you sporadically endorsing a tag by 'Ncm' possibly in return to 'Ncm' sporadically supporting you on HK falls article who in turn got a sporadic support from Mspraveen in framing the ban. வணக்கம் for now. 76.212.10.229 (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- With your peaceful time read all Rfc and what not, the wikidramas crated by you and your buddy editors. You will find Ncm's input on your side. I read wiki articles in detail but do not edit them. HK falls article is still with the same make believe statements. Another Vagabond from community multi-user system that does not violate wikipedia guide lines.76.212.12.238 (talk) 06:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Probably one the biggest misjudgements I have done would be to think that you would turn to a good leaf. You are free to grumble as much as you want. As I said earlier, if you want I am ready to help, but you have anoyed me with these messages enough. You are free to roam around on your own. Just to remind you that you have lost someone (me ofcourse) who was by your side till now because of your own actions. Go around and get more people pissed. Good luck. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 06:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar of peace
The Barnstar of Peace | ||
For your work in peacefully resolving persistent issues and pointing out necessary fixes in Periyar article RavichandarMy coffee shop 04:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC) |
- No mention! It's a great compliment. However, I hope my barnstar does not keep you stuck to Wiki at the cost of neglecting your other work. If it encourages you thus in the wrong way, I'm sorry-RavichandarMy coffee shop 11:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- By the way, have you completed your 25th DYK?-RavichandarMy coffee shop 12:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- No probs! You could create DYKs on articles related to science, can't you! ;)-RavichandarMy coffee shop 12:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Citations??? I don't understand what you mean! Citations for individual articles??? Or message on your userpage to indicate your status??? -RavichandarMy coffee shop 17:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- If you are planning to leave a "busy" message, you could check this out-RavichandarMy coffee shop 17:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a lot!
Thank you very much! :-) By the way, how do you know that it's my birthday today?-RavichandarMy coffee shop 18:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Anyway, thanks a lot for remembering my birthday! And thanks a lot for being the first person to wish me!
RavichandarMy coffee shop 18:41, 15 February 2009 (UTC) has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit! Here you can have the whole cake instead of a single piece ;)
Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- Yeah, I had it in my userpage. But I didn't know that it is going to interest someone so much that he/she is going to take note it leave alone remember it. Anyway, thanks again :-) -RavichandarMy coffee shop 16:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi! This source claims that P. T. Rajan joined the Swatantra Patry in 1959. Could you please verify this when you get time? By the way, I was able to get Randor Guy's blog whitelisted. Check out the refs in Lakshmikanthan Murder Case.-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 03:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Deve Gowda
I would like you to give me as much as info as you know about Deve Gowda, which I can put up on various articles relating to it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
FYI
did you guys see this? --Docku: What's up? 18:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:TN-GVT.JPG
File:TN-GVT.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Tamilnadu-Emblem.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Tamilnadu-Emblem.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Good luck!
wow. cant believe all reputed and established editors are leaving. good luck for your future, pls consider coming back after some real break. --Docku: What's up? 13:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I have removed the disputed fair use tag from this image because the image is not marked as fair use. If you feel that an image that is tagged as free may not be, you should use {{PUI}}. Stifle (talk) 19:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
hi !
hi there ...howzz u ??busy ?? whtz abt election ??--Doctor muthu's muthu wanna talk ? 21:05, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Periyar E. V. Ramasamy images
I als that many images like File:Annadurai and Periyar.JPG - that you uploaded, state the source as Dravidar Kazhagam and Permission obtained through email. The email should be forwarded to wikimedia via WP:OTRS system. --Redtigerxyz Talk 05:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
hi ! couldnt edit ut page to put this barnstar , kindly accept it .
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
hi ! kindly add this barn star cuz u deserve this for ur antivandalism effort in Tamilnadu related articles .Doctor muthu's muthu wanna talk ? 03:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC) |
regards
Hogenakkal Falls .
hi buddy howzz u ?? .....once again ta menace has started in Hogenakkal Falls...but this time i may ask for a ban on tht member as i have given the last warning in ta talk page.....since not many member's r involved this would do some good ....btw i feel tht a sockpuppet is also playing .....--Doctor muthu's muthu wanna talk ? 09:44, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
re:hogenakkal issue .
great to know tht u r good in managing time ......best wishes.....i already got the vandalisermember banned ....but his threat to ta admin took him to ta life ban ...... but now s/he is performing an ip vandalism tht too with silly citations like blog's which a bot reverts automatically .....i hope all going well......good luck buddy ....--Doctor muthu's muthu wanna talk ? 12:02, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
need ur suggestion !
hi ! howzz u ??.....wished to get some suggestions frm u on this for this , i wish to know if the rfd fails should i go & create an article with citations claiming tht the constitution has never specified any national language & such an attempt was failed . with link to articles Anti-Hindi agitations of Tamil Nadu & Languages of India . cuz i suppose tht evn the redirection is misguiding tht may give info tht the official language is nothing but the national language . thanks .--Doctor muthu's muthu wanna talk ? 02:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm afraid, in my opinion, the redirect is good enough. The Language controversies in India are pretty huge and don't just include "national language status". If you were to create a new article with the controversies, you will have to go a long way. For eg., the first call for an independent Muslim dominion Pak[i]stan claims that Urdu has been sidelined. Then we have the failure even in the recent past to recognise many of the Bihari languages as independent to Hindi. We can go on quoting examples, but my point is that the language controversy is not limited to the National Language status nor just with Tamil-Hindi political war. I would personally feel it as an herculean task not only because of my limited knowledge in the subject, but also that it would be a good prey for vandalism and edit wars. Hope this helps. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 09:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
DYK for C. Vijayaraghavachariar
welcome
pls get rid of that retired tag and jump in. --CarTick 21:07, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks mate. I will be on a bit later. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 23:05, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
File:Annadurai and Periyar.JPG
There is a discussion about this image right here. we would like some of your thoughts on this as u were the one who received the e-mail permission. specifically redtiger's questions. --CarTick 14:11, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
File:Periyar with Jinnah and Ambedkar.JPG
do we have permission for this file as well. if we do, could u pls leave a note on the file page. --CarTick 05:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, it was part of the PDF file with images sent to me. It is a PD anyways because of the date this picture was taken. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 06:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- little bit more complicated. you are right, it is in public domain in India but not in US. we r going to have to use the image u got permission for. you can follow our conversation here, Wikipedia:Peer review/Anti-Hindi agitations of Tamil Nadu/archive1. --CarTick 13:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Huh the copyright law!! Quite a pain isn't it? Anyways, hope now it is OK. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 17:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- I dont mean to bother you. just want to make sure we do everything we can. Redtiger raised an issue earlier during our discussion. If the person who released the image was an official associated with Dravidar Kazhagam and authorised to release the picture? Is there any way we can see the mail he sent to you. may be we should send him another mail seeking some clarification. --CarTick 19:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- The person was from Dravidar Kazhagam. To be specific from Periyar Media Unit. I had forwarded the emails I have to where Redtiger wanted me to earlier. Since I didn't hear back on any clarification, I reckon that everything is fine. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 20:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- I dont mean to bother you. just want to make sure we do everything we can. Redtiger raised an issue earlier during our discussion. If the person who released the image was an official associated with Dravidar Kazhagam and authorised to release the picture? Is there any way we can see the mail he sent to you. may be we should send him another mail seeking some clarification. --CarTick 19:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- u mean, u didnt get any mail from the place u had forwarded the mail to (wikipedia)? --CarTick 21:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, thats right. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 21:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- well, that sounds enough to me. that is pretty much what we, volunteers, can do. we are not running CIA here. if Redtiger or anybody is not convinced, let them raise the issue again and list it in WP:PUF or in any other appropriate place for discussion. --CarTick 21:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Probably someone should write a script that images not PD in USA not to appear on the articles when viewed from US IPs (something like this?). Why should rest of the English speaking world suffer because of laws in one land? Now there's a thought! Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 11:08, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- that sounds like an excellent idea. if someone could write such a script, your idea could be proposed to be incorporated in WP:Public domain policy. But, again, I dont understand the copyright legalities well. It may be better to discuss before embarking on anything. --CarTick 13:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yes we should deal it with care, unless we fancy wiping eggs off our faces.. :D Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 20:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- that sounds like an excellent idea. if someone could write such a script, your idea could be proposed to be incorporated in WP:Public domain policy. But, again, I dont understand the copyright legalities well. It may be better to discuss before embarking on anything. --CarTick 13:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)