User talk:Wikiality123/Archive8
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Wikiality123. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
hi !
yep a bit busy .... studying & designing websites ( my parttime profession - http://nikitatelecom.ru/ , http://moscowtravels.ru/ etc .... ) ...... so howzz u ?? long time no see....--Doctor muthu's muthu wanna talk ? 17:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
is warranted Taprobanus (talk) 17:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Expecting your views here-RavichandarMy coffee shop 10:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
DMK
Done. Apologies for the typo. The "next update" page is not protected, BTW :) Gatoclass (talk) 23:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: Genetics
Yeah, I'll have a look at the paper. But kindly pardon me. I don't wish to make any statement over it as genetics is not my cup of tea.-RavichandarMy coffee shop 02:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Maraimalai Adigal
DYK for Tamil National Party
GA Article
Need some help Can you take a look at this E. V. RamasamyOnly a few things need to be done.You are one of the best in this type of editing.The deadline has been extended for 5 days.The article was protected at one point for more than 9 months and it has come so far.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Thamizhaga Munnetra Munnani
DYK for Henry Alfred Krishnapillai
DYK for Henry Alfred Krishnapillai
DYK for Johann Phillip Fabricius
RE: Periyar
Took care of it here. Thanks. Wiki Raja (talk) 22:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hoi. The article on Thol. Thirumavalavan had degenerated into something of a hatefest. I've taken a stab at fixing it, but Dravidian politics is really more up your alley than mine, so it'd be great if you could have a look at it as and when you have the time. -- Arvind (talk) 23:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Will look there in a bit. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 13:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look. The article had seen drastic edits by one or more Sri Lankan editors, who'd turned it into a screed about his support for the LTTE. I thought that was way overblown (he's best known for his domestic politics, not for his views on the LTTE), so as you saw I tried to clean the article up a bit. My main concerns are as to whether I've accurately portrayed his views - I've read some of his columns in India Today, but I've not really been engaged with Tamil politics for the past couple of years, so I wasn't sure if my summary represents his current views - and whether the article still overly emphasises his support for the LTTE. How would you suggest we deal with the latter issue?
- Incidentally, I know the VCK isn't a Dravidian party in that it isn't a descendant of the DK, but it's ideology is quite clearly derived from that of Periyar, so it is part of the Dravidian movement in a broader sense. I suppose it'd be most accurate to call them "Dravidian revivalist", in that they seek to return the Dravidian movement to its original ideals, which the descendants of the DK have abandoned. But that's just my view, of course. -- Arvind (talk) 22:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Stephen Neill
Thank you for your hard work on Periyar E. V. Ramasamy. Following an excellent copyedit on the suggestions provided, I have now passed this article as a Good article, and updated the various talk page templates to reflect this.
That also means you get one of these:
This user helped promote Periyar E. V. Ramasamy to good article status. |
which you may like to place on your user page (or somewhere suitable) by copy/pasting
{{User Good Article|Periyar E. V. Ramasamy}} into the page code.
Great job - well done! Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 12:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Thank you for the trust you placed in me by supporting my RfA (which passed and, apparently, I am now an admin!). I will do my best to continue to act in a way that is consistent with the policies of wikipedia as well with our common desire to build and perfect this repository of human knowledge; and can only hope that you never feel that your trust was misplaced. Thanks again! --Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 23:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Congrats on the good job you've done on the article on Periyar! :-) However, I feel that there are some major issues with the article which need to be addressed. Please have a look at this and provide your comments and opinions. Thanks!-RavichandarMy coffee shop 03:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Karl Graul
DYK nomination of Henrique Henriques
Hello! Your submission of Henrique Henriques at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dravecky (talk) 12:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)