User talk:WikiCalambenyo

Calamba, Laguna

What is your problem with my edits to Calamba, Laguna? I make the article much better by formatting it consistently with other Philippine municipalities/cities, by correcting mistakes, by removing obvious duplication, and removing non-encyclopedic content (for example, WP is not a directory for listing businesses).

By undoing all these changes in one shot without any explanation you are disregarding WP principles and policies, such as WP:EDIT and WP:MOS. I will revert it back again and if you have specific issues with my edits, discuss the matter on Calamba's talk page to come to consensus instead of just undoing everything. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:49, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my changes again without any reason or comment, not even a reply here or on the article's talk page. Read WP:EW before reverting again. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:21, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Calamba, Laguna". Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 15:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Please see WP:AN3#User:WikiCalambenyo reported by User:P199 (Result: ) where problems with your edits have been asserted. If you don't respond there it is possible you may be blocked from editing. It is noteworthy that you have never left a comment on an article talk page. This suggests you have no interest in negotiating with others. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Calamba, Laguna. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 14:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Calamba, Laguna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UNA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Xeltran. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Calamba, Laguna seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Xeltran (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Calamba, Laguna. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Xeltran (talk) 13:05, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Only Warning. If you continue to disruptively edit at Calamba, Laguna without discussion, as you did last November, which is what caused you to be blocked then, you will be blocked again, but this time for significantly longer. You are engaging in a slow edit war, you are adding unsourced material replete with errors, and you are removing maintenance templates without explanation.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:17, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Calamba, Laguna. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

For three months you have continued to revert this page to your own preference without any discussion. You never explain yourself on talk pages or use any edit summaries. Others have taken this to dispute resolution and the 3RR noticeboard but you never respond. You are indefinitely blocked until such time as you agree to discuss your changes and abide by consensus. If you agree to do so, use the {{unblock}} template. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]